[Air-l] Re: SMS

Alex Kuskis akuskis at ican.net
Sat Jan 18 07:56:18 PST 2003


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ulla Bunz" <bunz at scils.rutgers.edu>
To: <air-l at aoir.org>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Air-l] Re: SMS


> Another interesting observation (to me) is that in countries like Germany,
> cell phone use is extremely popular, and the technological component is
> more advanced than here, but still usage is more expensive. Teenagers send
> SMS because it is cheaper than using the cell phone.
> Ulla
>
Why the American cell (or mobile) phone market developed so differently than
in the rest of the world. "Developing nations have adopted an inferior
alternative to Qualcomm's technology based not on technical merit, but
because it gives them a choice of supplier: something the heads of the San
Diego monoculture can't quite seem to understand. They talk ohms and hertz.
But people hate monopolies, and they hate bullies." By Andrew Orlowski, The
Register, November 20, 2002...............Alex
Alex.Kuskis at utoronto.ca

              20 November 2002
              Updated: 21:31 GMT






                  Register Services
                  Register ISP
                  Reg Jobsearch
                  Reg Reader Research
                  Reg Merchandise
                  IT-minds bookstore

                  Sections
                  Front Page
                  Software
                  Enterprise Systems
                  Servers
                  Storage
                  Personal Hardware
                  Semiconductors
                  Internet
                  Security
                  Virus News
                  Business
                  Networks
                  Bootnotes
                  This Week's Headlines








                  Wireless
                  Broadband
                  e-business
                  The Mac Channel
                  Channel Flannel
                  BOFH
                  Letters
                  Site News
                  Contact us


            The Reg Newsletter
            Enter your email address here for our daily news update.


            Get the Reg Screensaver.

            Join the Reg SETI group.

            Join Reg Cancerbusters.



--------------------------------------------------------------------

            Phones more disruptive than PC or Internet - Rheingold
            By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
            Posted: 20/11/2002 at 11:48 GMT


            Howard Rheingold's got the mobile bug, big time. The genial pop
commentator who mapped out virtual communities before most of us had even
reached our first Gopher server has been traveling the world and discovered
the transformative power of mobile phones. He thinks mobile phones will
become more important than the Internet or the PC.

            Oh, bugger. He's in our little (global) secret. These devices
have created a shared communications infrastructure, texting, that a few
remote portions of the planet haven't quite caught up with, and he wants to
spread the word.

            Now such boosterism will be old hat to most European and Asian
readers, who've been walking the talk for some years, and to regular
Register readers who will by now know the scuttlebutt of the phone
industry's politics as second nature. For years we've been pointing out that
the biggest computer company on the planet is not Dell, or Sun or IBM, but
Nokia. At the four corners of the globe, people use these computers without
even realizing it or sparing a thought about the 'platform battles' that the
tech press chews over daily. It's a popular revolt of sorts. This we all
know.

            But this is a message that needs to land square in the heartland
of the most powerful nation on earth, which is the only nation not to heed
the call, and embrace this most personal of technologies to its heart.

            Rheingold went to Finland, and saw people organize their week's
calendars by phone on the morning commute. He also saw barefoot Sao Paulo
slum-dwellers use phones to receive labor market updates, and in India
fishermen traded tips and the latest market prices in real time using text
messaging.

            Howard did a reading in the Haight last night from his new book
SmartMobs and we shared a coffee beforehand. His explorations were pretty
welcome news, we thought, after a weekend of the most bizarre, green ink,
survivalist emails we've been getting from Qualcomm cranks: a tiny but
vociferous fringe group that harasses comms commentators. (A sample here).

            There's a reason for this.

            Opt-out
            Quite, bizarrely, the US opted-out of the global phone standard
and allowed a home-grown monopolist in San Diego to call the shots. It
looked like a good move at the time, if you were insulated from the global
alliances then taking shape.

            Qualcomm was blessed with great technology ideas, but cursed
with such feral business manners that it alienated its would-be partners and
ended up offending even its most loyal customers (the Koreans have very
publicly regretted partnering with the CDMA-bravaggadico. Now the Chinese
have got the message.)

            Telecomms is a uniquely touchy feely business, and depends on
sharing IP. This comes from the interconnected-ness of doing phone
business - where all dial tones need must sound alike, across continents -
so things happen slowly and on the basis of hard-earned trust. Then some
brash kid pops up, and not only tells everyone they've been doing it all
wrong all along, to boot, but that they owe this new kid some money. Quite a
lot of money.

            So we have a modern tragedy, of sorts: Qualcomm could have owned
the world (or at least a fairly decent share), but it blew it away. It's not
a busted flush by any means - it pioneered an interesting spread spectrum
radio technique and bagged 40 per cent of the world's patents in CDMA, and
so earns a deserved percentage royalty on future baseband revenues - but it
boxed itself into a corner, and now looks destined to become a footnote to
history, rather than the pioneer its engineers hoped it would be. Developing
nations have adopted an inferior alternative to Qualcomm's technology based
not on technical merit, but because it gives them a choice of supplier:
something the heads of the San Diego monoculture can't quite seem to
understand. They talk ohms and hertz. But people hate monopolies, and they
hate bullies. The combination of the two is utterly repellant, no matter how
superior the ohms and hertz spiel its technical folk like to talk about
might be. The rest of the world long ago realized that such technical
twaddle wasn't worth a candle compared to joining a global infrastructure.
If you sold X.400 email systems in 1995, you'd know exactly what we we're
talking about.

            But to give you a flavor of Qualcomm's nutball fringe, let us
introduce you do one correspondent who billed himself as "Supreme
Dragonlord" aka one Mr Evan Coyle Maloney, who gave us three paragraphs of
apparent coherent argument before delivering a warning not to "enslave
yourselves to creeping socialism!!!".

            Now, not all Qualcomm defenders belong to right-wing militia
groups, but a weirdly disproportionate number would seem to qualify. There's
an interesting debate about how fringe technologies (such as CDMA) attract
nutters, and how nutters are drawn to fringe technologies (such as CDMA),
but it's one best left to another place, and more qualified psychologists
than us.

            So Qualcomm's lasting legacy will not be technology, but
poisoning the US market to the kind of services and standards that those Sao
Paulo slumdwellers take for granted. And here, Howard steps in.

            Text Deficit
            We don't think Americans are so uniquely different (despite our
mailbag) that they don't deserve mobile data, we were relieved to hear
Rheingold agreed.

            How did it happen everywhere else, but not here?

            Price was a big persuader, reckoned Howard. In Europe, it was
cheaper to text someone telling them that you were late, than making that
call.

            "But there's that Darwinian, biological niche a way for people
to communicate that's convenient - people flock to it. It wasn't a plan -
texting wasn't a plan. Engineers included it in the GSM standard but it
wasn't marketed."

            "The messages people began to send were useful. 'I'll meet you
at Fifth and Main' - those are really useful. And it doesn't make any
sound."

            Having traveled amongst the texting continents, was there much
disparity betweens patterns of use?

            "A Japanese household is not a good place to have a
conversation - people socialize outside; so suddenly you could communicate
with your friends and your parents couldn't hear you."

            "If you're 15 in Rio or Bangkok or London or Helsinki you have a
lot more in common with your telephone use. I was surprised how similar it
is in Brazil to Europe. Fifteen year olds are really becoming accustomed to
these devices. Like the PC or the Internet these will become more powerful.
These are thousand of times more powerful now than the PC was in 1980".

            So if personal communications were so popular all over the
world, why was the USA an exception?

            "It's not interoperable. In some cases it was less expensive to
make a voice call, the low cost of a voice call made texting a luxury"

            "There's always been a reluctance of US operators to let go of
high product margins. And they've marketed to 30 year old executives, not 15
year old girls, like they did in Finland.

            "When the threshold is lowered, things pop."

            We mentioned the green-ink correspondents who insisted that
thanks to the car-bound commute, Americans had no time for mobile data.

            "Are we so different to Brazil? They commute. I don't
understand - how are Americans different to Thais, Brazilians, or Italians?"

            "Yeah. LA, Atlanta and Denver are spread out places with a lot
of automobiles. New York, San Francisco and Boston are concentrated - I
don't think that's it."

            And there are so many hours in the week, we concurred, the
commute time makes for a pretty feeble demand-side excuse.

            "Interestingly enough, the Hiptop, which is Deutsche Telecom,
has realized this. And Sprint is new and innovative carrier, while AT&T goes
back to the monopoly.

            "These are cultures of fear rather than cultures of greed and
opportunity. If I was a telco I'd give them away. Give them ten phones and
six months' free service."

            Rheingold already sees Hiptop as the driver with the consumers
while Blackberry has a strong hold with enterprise customers. Last week
Nokia licensed RIM's Blackberry software, so it can integrate enterprise
messaging in with its regular bundle of consumer services: SMS texting, and
MMS.

            But the phone companies have a leap, reckons Rheingold.

            "It's totally about flirting and gaming."

            What a relief it is to hear things aren't so different. Once
we're rid of the militia, here, we look forward to joining the rest of the
world. ®

            Related Link
            Howard's SmartMobs blog

            Related Story
            US 'doesn't need wireless data' - readers










             Cash'n'Carrion Reg Shop    Register Recruitment - Real jobs for
real people
             fish4jobs - Find the right job in your area






-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0006.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 9618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0014.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1586 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0015.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0016.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1921 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0017.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 134 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0018.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 3367 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0019.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4663 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0007.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 559 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0020.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/attachments/20030118/94586006/attachment-0008.obj>


More information about the Air-L mailing list