[Air-l] Warchalking does not exist: a wager.
admin at sociopranos.com
Mon Jun 30 09:15:55 PDT 2003
Thought you might find the following article of interest.
Sociopranos - Society Redefined: All new members welcome!
www.sociopranos.com Mature online Discussion Forum.
Gamedays - For True Gamers: Join Now for Mature Discussion ... most of the
www.gamedays.com [Xbox - GCN - PS2 - Everything else!]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Sandvig" <csandvig at uiuc.edu>
To: <air-l at aoir.org>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:32 PM
Subject: [Air-l] Warchalking does not exist: a wager.
> Hi Steve and air-l colleagues,
> Steve: Remember the hallway conversation we had last fall about whether
> not 'true' Warchalking exists? If I remember, it was your contention that
> it does and that you'd seen it in the Loop. As you know I'm doing a
> research project on Wi-Fi and I've been trying to settle this for a while.
> I'm writing this note to air-l because I need help.
> For background, Warchalking is the use of symbols (marked with chalk) to
> indicate the presence of a Wi-Fi hotspot. In pure form, the story of
> warchalking is that there is a subculture of Wi-Fi users that use chalk to
> communicate with each other about Wi-Fi locations. Hip/cool businesses
> co-opted the subcultural warchalking to advertise their own hotspots.
> at: http://www.warchalking.org/
> My contention is that the first (subcultural) story about warchalking
> is entirely a media phenomenon -- it is a beautiful idea, but it doesn't
> make any sense as a directory service to find Wi-Fi. It is too easy to
> a warchalk mark, and the chalk wears away (or washes away in the rain) too
> quickly. Warchalking symbols were heavily promoted in the New York Times
> just *48 hours* after they were first made public on the Web. There was a
> subsequent wave of media stories about warchalking, giving everyone ideas.
> Every single occurrence of chalk I've found can be attributed to chalkers
> who want to self-promote their own mark. So I believe that people *do*
> rarely make warchalking marks for various reasons (to be cool, to
> for their own network) but I *don't* believe that people use warchalking
> marks in a meaningful way to find Wi-Fi.
> After the conversation with Steve, on December 18th I posted an call to
> colleagues around the world asking for verifiable instances of warchalking
> that work the way that warchalking describes itself. Reports to date:
> zero. If warchalking worked as a directory location service, shouldn't I
> able to find it?
> I just had a close call -- a friend told me that my office at Oxford had
> been warchalked. Since it is a WEP (non-open) node and I didn't do it,
> could be half of a "true" instance of warchalking! I ran out as soon as I
> heard but couldn't find the mark. It must have washed away? (Here in
> England, it is raining.)
> So I am willing to propose a wager, or a bounty. I'll bet one dollar that
> warchalking is not a meaningful way of locating Wi-Fi hotspots. To win
> bounty, can anyone deliver someone that uses warchalking to locate Wi-Fi
> Caveats: (1) Warchalking done by the provider of the hotspot does not
> count -- it is supposedly a co-option of the "pure" subculture. I dispute
> the subculture, not the self-promotion. (2) I am not disputing that
> wardriving, warwalking, and online hotspot mapping (warchalking with bits
> GIS databases, not with chalk) exist as advertised. (Though others have.)
> My beef here is only about the chalk part.
> I've made a web page for this bet that has the relevant emails I've sent
> some links: http://www.niftyc.org/bet/
> As you may have guessed I'm writing a paper about this. Email me if you
> want a copy when I finish. Thank you for any help!
> Air-l mailing list
> Air-l at aoir.org
More information about the Air-l