[Air-l] Google is watching !

joan carol urquhart jcu at execulink.com
Sat May 22 20:13:38 PDT 2004


Lurking along in this debate gives me pause for definition.

What kind of terminology applies?
When one (re)searches a conversational database,
for example, a listserve archive,
to mine it for its content
across a period of years with a shifting membership of subscribers
and wishing to quote with accuracy
for strict research purposes,
does one think in terms of quoting human participants
or in terms of quoting from authored texts?


Joan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Maximilian Forte" <mcforte at kacike.org>
To: <air-l at aoir.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Air-l] Google is watching !


> Good points Rowin,
>
> I too thought that the primary ethical issue concerning the treatment of
> postings in publicly available postings was copyright. The notion of
privacy
> in this case not only seems counterintuitive, it is entirely redundant.
You
> simply cannot, as a researcher, protect the privacy of something that is
> already public.
>
> Secondly, it does not matter if Internet users are not savvy. The point is
> that nothing the researcher does should cause greater harm to persons than
> they may already be doing to themselves.
>
> Thirdly, consent is not an issue since the researcher did not actually
> solicit the information--the information was already there, in full public
> view. Moreover, for privacy to have been compromised means that there must
> have been an intrusion by a researcher. There is no intrusion involved in
> examining publicly available postings.
>
> I agree with a previous posting that suggested there is a "privacy for
> privacy's sake" undercurrent in a lot of the messages being posted to this
> list. At this rate, we'll soon be talking about how "unethical" it is to
> cite electronic documents.
>
> [Now, if you were to ask me if it's good field research practice to *not*
> allow someone to revise or restate their position, I would say no. If
there
> were a way of allowing authors of public postings to have this chance,
that
> might be the basis for a valuable conversation, perhaps much more
> instructive than the original posting...and then we would be back into
> conventional ethical guidelines as this person would be transformed into
an
> informant, or at least a respondent.]
>
> Cheers Rowin,
>
> Max.
>
> Dr Maximilian C. Forte
> Assistant Professor in Anthropology
> Department of Anthropology and Sociology
> University College of Cape Breton
> P.O. Box 5300, Sydney, NS, Canada, B1P 6L2
> Tel: 902-563-1947
> Fax: 902-563-1247
> E-mail: max_forte at uccb.ca
> Website: http://faculty.uccb.ns.ca/mforte/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Air-l mailing list
> Air-l at aoir.org
> http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l





More information about the Air-L mailing list