[Air-l] Wikipedia warning -- Wikipedia is not a reliable information source
pjones at metalab.unc.edu
Mon Dec 5 09:10:39 PST 2005
In our house, we have a World Book from the early 60s. The article on
television is written by folks from RCA. It barely mentions Farnsworth.
Many of the articles on the Roman Catholic Church are written and approved
by the Church. You might imagine what is not in those articles.
When I was in Junior High (now known as Middle School), students regularly
used only one source -- World Book.
Were these happier times?
This doesn't make up for wikipedia's failings. But I will point out that
wikipedia's failing are part of a public debate with attempts to make
corrections and to clarify the use of wikipedia as a primary reference.
Such was not the case with World Book to my knowledge.
See this article on CNet which has not I think been posted to this list:
Growing pains for Wikipedia
By Daniel Terdiman
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: December 5, 2005, 4:00 AM PST
For Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, last week was a tough one. And he's
going to change the ground rules for the popular anyone-can-contribute
encyclopedia because of it.
First, in a Nov. 29 op-ed piece in USA Today, a former administrative
assistant to Robert Kennedy lambasted the free online reference work for
an article that suggested he may have been involved in the assassinations
of both Robert F. Kennedy and John F. Kennedy.
Then, on Dec. 1, a new flurry of attention came when former MTV VJ and
podcasting pioneer Adam Curry was accused of anonymously editing out
references to other people's seminal podcasting work in an article about
the hot new digital medium.
"Work as if you live in the early days of a better nation." Alasdair Gray
pjones at ibiblio.org voice: (919) 962-7600 fax: (919) 962-8071
More information about the Air-L