[Air-l] wikipedia and defamation
Ulf-Dietrich Reips
ureips at genpsy.unizh.ch
Tue Dec 6 09:27:12 PST 2005
At 22:45 Uhr -0500 5.12.2005, Barry Wellman wrote:
>the current AOIR debate about wikipedia highlights another problem.
>It is quite easy to make legally defamatory statements on Wikipedia.
Empirically, these statements are only harmful on a significant scale
if anyone looks at them, believes them (and - in some cases - repeats
them). The Seigenthaler episode is a good example. Being rather
ignorant about the Who's Who in the media business I wouldn't have
known of Seigenthaler and would never have connected him with the
Robert Kennedy assassination, if it weren't for this discussion on
air-l. The discussion only evolved because Seigenthaler himself (or
his attourneys or his PR consultants) chose not to simply erase the
false information but to contact mainstream classic media outlets.
Ironically, in doing this Seigenthaler created a memory trace of a
connection between his name and the assassinantion in many more minds
than if he had just corrected the false information in the wikipedia
entry.
Maybe someone could dig a bit into the wikipedia logs and compare
view stats for the versions of the Seigenthaler article on wikipedia?
Ulf
More information about the Air-L
mailing list