[Air-L] UPI (was: AoIR in today's Washington Post)

[Zeynep Tufekci]

The UPI one is really beyond the pale. It's one thing to mock academia
in general. But this is just a vicious, ignorant personal attack.

-z

On Dec 17, 2007 12:53 PM, Christian Nelson <xianknelson at mac.com> wrote:
> The UPI version is much more problematic. The reporter suggests that
> danah boyd's critics are correct, and casts all the SNS research as
> worthless. Quite an unfair synopsis.
> --Christian Nelson
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Michael Zimmer wrote:
>
> > What's worse than a poorly researched and skewed WP article? The UPI
> > crib-note version, of course:
> >
> > <http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Quirks/2007/12/16/
> > majoring_in_facebook_at_uc_berkely/4780/>
> >
> > Yikes.
> >
> > -mz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>