[Air-l] we need a better word than lurking

[Christine Moellenberndt]

jerichob at juno.com wrote:
> This thread was introduced because someone didn't think lurking should 
> be considered a bad thing, and thus should have a label with less 
> negative connotations, but in the discussion some fairly strong 
> normative judgments about lurkers and lurking have emerged which seem 
> to indicate that having a word with negative connotations is 
> warranted.  It's interesting.


I wouldn't go so far as to say that "having a word with negative 
connotations" is a good thing... but the way I see it, this is a word 
that the Internet community chose to describe these people. Who are we 
to say "wow you know what, that word is bad. We're going to pick another 
one and use that instead because we don't like it."

If it's the word in common usage, then I say use it.  Why create a new 
jargon term, when one already exists? ;)

I don't really know if lurking *is* considered a bad thing... maybe 
frustrating in channels that were once highly active and now are not, 
therefore needing a desperate infusion of new ideas and new blood... but 
I'd rather see someone lurk for a while and then participate (like me. 
hi!), instead of jumping in with both feet not knowing how things are 
done and causing an uproar that can upset the flow of discussions.  I've 
seen *that* happen too many times before :)

(sorry if someone brought this up before, I got lost in the thread for a 
bit!)

-Christine