[Air-L] using wikipedia articles in academic paper

[Stephan Humer]

Hello everybody.

I think that Wikipedia is great for explaining technical details or
information like "GSM" or "Atari", but not as a discussible source like
primary literature. (With one exception: if Wikipedia is the object
of investigation itself ;-) For people who know how to distinguish details
Wikipedia can be a great help: If you know that the explanation of e.g. GSM
is correct, so you can trust the Wikipedia article, why should you cite a 
user manual? My opinion is that the citation of a user manual looks quite 
strange in this context when you can use Wikipedia as well. Where should be
the benefit of using the manual then?

And, of course, this whole topic still seems to be a question of socialization
and misunderstanding. I suspect that old school researchers tend to use old 
school methods and sources too often.

Best

-- 
Dr. Stephan G. Humer
Research Director, Digital Class, University of the Arts Berlin
Senior Fellow, University of Applied Sciences Potsdam

For detailed contact information see www.humer.tel

> Hi everybody,
> 
> recently I got the following comment from a reviewer of a paper of
> mine:
> 
> " *There is considerable use made of wikipedia and in an academic
> paper this is disappointing. *"
> 
> I was thinking, what is the general practice in using wikipedia in
> academic paper writing?
> and are there limits/rules/good practices that you follow, both in
> writing and in review processes?
> 
> If for example I am writing a paper on the peer review process in Open
> Source development, I often use wikipedia articles as references for
> technical terms, like "Diff", "CVS" or "Conditional Programming".
> 
> Not being a Computer Scientist myself and thinking that the audience
> of my writings won't be composed of Computer Scientists as well, I
> feel that it is good to provide some basic references for complex,
> technical and often obscure terms.
> In this cases I prefer to use wikipedia articles, rather than Computer
> Programming or Operating Systems manuals, because I think that those
> articles are better and can be easily reached by anybody.
> 
> On the contrary I never use wikipedia articles as references for
> sustaining an academic argument or as references for authors (e.g. I
> do not use the wikipedia article fo Harold Garfinkel, but I use the
> book Studies in Ethnomethodology; I never use the wikipedia article
> for referencing the "situated action" concept, but I use Lucy Suchman
> book).
> 
> So, any thoughts? comments?
> 
> S.
> 
> --
> Italian Conference on Free Software 2009
> http://www.confsl.org/confsl09/
> 
> Stop the numbers game
> http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1300000/1297815/p19-
> parnas.html?key1=1297815&key2=1569876321&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=25586
> 362&CFTOKEN=14513600
> 
> My institutional page
> http://www.nuim.ie/nirsa/people/postdocs/stefano_de_paoli.shtml
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> 
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/