[Air-L] e: Fw: Re: Missing Data in Qualitative and Online Research

[andrea baker]

Hi, William and others,

I'd like to first express my appreciation for the question of missing 
data in qualitative and online research and for the excellent 
responses that make for such good reading and opportunities for 
thinking on this list.  I also offer a few thoughts on the matter.

May I first underscore the aforementioned basic tool of 
triangulation, using other methods of inquiry to supplement whatever 
ia your primary data collection technique?  I don't think this can be 
overstated, that interviews can add to participant/observation, for 
example, to give different perspectives.

Second, through what people say about each other, data is gained, 
through the secondary source, even when a person or group may not 
share that information directly.  This information gives a more 
well-rounded picture than not having access to it at all.

Third, we may have to trade off completeness for an in-depth look at 
some areas.  For example, the researcher may know of a splinter group 
that exists behind the scenes and know from evidence that the 
influence on the main online community is there.  However, without 
direct access or people talking about it in depth, the researcher may 
decide to mention it briefly, giving most attention to the main 
community,

All this is predicated on working within what your IRB has approved, of course.
-- 
cheers,
andee