[Air-L] Facebook data goes public
stefania.muca at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 11 06:00:32 PST 2010
Michael and Jacob, you have a point. But I meant good news for researchers not users. The ethics is debatable, indeed.
Sharon, I don't think this has anything to do with how Facebook looks now, it just means making this public and official.
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:39:47 -0800
From: live <human.factor.one at gmail.com>
To: Michael Zimmer <zimmerm at uwm.edu>
Cc: AIR Aoir <air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
Subject: Re: [Air-L] Facebook data goes public
Message-ID: <DDCBBBDD-69C8-4C91-8D6E-0D97D9A700D1 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
I'm pretty sure this is not build recently - so, hence, not in
reaction to Facebook's change in architecture.
I think perhaps Facebook made the change because of people like Warden
who were spidering the public profiles; just like people spidered the
web for content years ago.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Michael Zimmer wrote:
> I tend to agree with Jacob. I haven't had the chance to fully
> process/ponder this case (teaching today), but it seems that using
> an exploit based on Facebook's recent change in architecture -- when
> not all users have fully understood the consequences of said change
> -- to harvest profile information is extremely problematic from a
> research ethics pov.
> I'll blog about this later, and hope to start a conversation at http://www.internetresearchethics.org
> as well.
> Michael Zimmer, PhD
> Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies
> Associate, Center for Information Policy Research
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> e: zimmerm at uwm.edu
> w: www.michaelzimmer.org
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Jacob Kramer-Duffield wrote:
>> I will respectfully disagree about the goodness of this news.
>> " Warden says he's removed identifying profile URLs but kept names,
>> locations, Fan page lists and partial Friends lists."
>> Did he ask permission? I know these are "public" profiles - or were
>> when indexed, anyways - but being an individual and having a public
>> profile is a different thing than being aggregated as part of a
>> massive data set.
>> This is an issue of power. Zuckerberg can talk about the end of
>> privacy because his privilege guarantees that there won't be
>> negative consequences to his publicity (and this would be true even
>> if he weren't CEO of Facebook). A clever coder can talk about the
>> "sneaky" ways you can use your friends' e-mails and Mechanical Turk
>> to mass-harvest profiles from Facebook.
>> But that doesn't speak to the ethical responsibilities that we have
>> as academic researchers. I don't think that the way that Facebook
>> handles its' users data is responsible, and I don't think that
>> figuring out ways to exploit that handling is responsible, either.
>> On 2/9/10 9:14 AM, Stefania Muca wrote:
>>> Hello, I just wanted to share the good news :)
More information about the Air-L