[Air-L] Reid Cornwell - general related question

live human.factor.one at gmail.com
Mon Jan 4 12:21:44 PST 2010

I actually have an inquiry that is related, and I'm highly curious  
what the list response is:

I've someone I know who is calling themselves a '<redacted term>  
As such, they have been invited to speak and have been presenting at  
various conferences.
They do not have a PhD and they're under the age of 25, having just  
graduated from college.

Is this ethical? Can a term 'psychologist' or anthropologist' be used  
by someone not having attended graduate education?
What say this list?

On Jan 4, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Chris Hodge wrote:

> I can understand people misrepresenting the nature of their personal
> contacts for self-aggrandizement (FB body counts), and I can
> understand people misrepresenting associations and affiliations for
> professional gain (fictitious advisory boards). As sins go, I guess
> I'm not sure this is much worse than resume-padding.

More information about the Air-L mailing list