[Air-L] distributed imagery and copyright [Air-L Digest, Vol 66, Issue 20]
praxis at theinternationale.com
Wed Jan 20 00:47:07 PST 2010
Of course the use of an image by a Media (Big or 'Citizen') as an
element in a piece of commercial, or even non-commercial journalism is
an issue. Leaving aside the lack of professionalism as well as the
legality, here the issue is one of using an image (without consent)
because the image's 'meaning' (sic) is needed for the story.
The question I am working through is what happens when the image(s)
'used' (in a non-commercial, critical 'artwork') are being included not
for what they signify as an individual image but because they are part
of a distributed stream or flow where. It is the stream of media that is
being brought in that is the subject.
How, for instance do we understand
or indeed the Yahoo Pipes Aggergator I have put together:
On 19/01/2010 23:00, air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org wrote:
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:34:15 +0530
> From: Mridula<mridula at gmail.com>
> To:air-l at listserv.aoir.org
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] distributed imagery and copyright (was: a
> question of open source ethics)
> <459bd09b1001182104j6bbf0efam767695eefa93c23f at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> The issue with the independent ended up by the paper apologizing for the use
> of the 'all rights reserved' photo.
> Here is more on it the British Journal of Photography-
> To me (as a less than amateur photographer) the issue is very clear. When I
> post something under 'all rights reserved' that is how it should remain. If
> someone asked me permission for the use of a photograph and they are not for
> profit, I ask for a credit and let them use it. If it is a commercial site I
> ask for token money and usually in India you never hear from them again.
> In this part some of us use 'all rights reserved' to initiate a
> conversation. I once found, and not so long back, a photo of mine in an
> Indian national newspaper's Sunday supplement after cropping out (c) Mridula
> D from the image. Hence, the hesitation to use creative commons, that it
> would be taken as an excuse by everyone to use pictures.
content to be different
-------------- next part --------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 270.14.150/2632 - Release Date: 01/19/10 07:34:00
More information about the Air-L