[Air-L] twitter useless to study?

D.Yvette Wohn yvettewohn at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 18:56:39 PST 2011


I think Twitter is a useful profiling tool.
If you are following Barry Wellman *and* Lady Gaga, what does it mean? ;)

@arcticpenguin

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:49 PM, live <human.factor.one at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think it's useless to study in terms of *how* people communicate
> digitally. Lots of linguistic cues and language changes have begun in sms
> and then parlayed over to Twitter, where they're being solidified into
> standard language usage.
> Not getting the full subset of data doesn't matter if one is just studying
> the medium itself, and less the message(s).
>
> Cheers,
> @SharonG
>
> On Mar 4, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Barry Wellman wrote:
>
>  As an object of study, its hard to do quant analysis of Twitter now
>> because so much of it is spam (unless you're studying spam, that is).
>>
>> And even qualitative analyses will have to be careful.
>>
>> Our 2 Twitterology papers got into the sweet spot when Twitter was an
>> appreciable size but before spam dominated (about 80% of my new would-be
>> Followers)
>>
>> OTOH, I find Twitter useful for research leads -- such as the Atlantic
>> article a tweep broadcast today about how the Internet almost fractured --
>> or Zeynep et al's (@techsoc) discussion of social media and MENA
>> revolutions.
>> Barry Wellman
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>



More information about the Air-L mailing list