[Air-L] Twitter Data Sharing Update - Thou Shalt Not Share Collections of Tweets

Alex Leavitt alexleavitt at gmail.com
Thu May 5 08:34:39 PDT 2011


>From what I understand talking with Devin and others on our team at the Web
Ecology Project, having dealt with 140kit a few months ago, Twitter didn't
want any data made available regardless of it being free or anyone getting
paid. I think the stipulation was that you can download and pass around your
own tweets, but not others'. You can also do analytics on any data that you
gather and release that, but not the actual tweets.

But I'm sure Devin can explain all this in more detail.

Alex

---

Alexander Leavitt
PhD Student
USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
Researcher
Microsoft Research New England
http://alexleavitt.com
Twitter: @alexleavitt




On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Ulf-Dietrich Reips
<u.reips at ikerbasque.org>wrote:

> To me it seems the owners of Internet-based services go too far sometimes
> in claiming rights to authors' content. To vary an old Internet metaphor: An
> owner of a road should not be entitled to claim royalties to pictures of
> cars that have driven over the road.
>
> Eventually it may boil down to something like this: you may publish
> collections of tweets, but they will have to be stripped from any
> service-specific "marks" (e.g. hashtags).
>
> Best --u
>
>
> At 9:51 Uhr -0500 5.5.2011, Michael Zimmer wrote:
>
>> Stu-
>>
>> I'm not in full agreement with your starting point that tweets "yearn to
>> be free".  I think the nature of the platform (140 character limit,
>> broadcast as one voice among millions of accounts, viewed via a live stream
>> that makes it almost impossible to read every single one) also supports the
>> notion that tweets are meant to be fleeting.
>>
>> -michael
>>
>>
>>
>>   On May 5, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Stuart Shulman wrote:
>>>
>>>   Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>>  We did not contest the violation warning and so we took the data down.
>>>> The policy is another matter. These are tweets that yearn to be free,
>>>> insofar as tweets can collectively yearn for anything:
>>>>
>>>>  http://bit.ly/ixJVHu
>>>>
>>>>  In this instance, I find myself liking the Facebook policy, which in an
>>>> opposite manner sets data free. This may explain, in part, why the "Scraping
>>>> Facebook" video seems to be getting more views than the one on harvesting
>>>> Twitter tweets:
>>>>
>>>>  http://www.screencast.com/t/iW3rvdYY
>>>>
>>>>  ~Stu
>>>>
>>>>  On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Michael Zimmer <zimmerm at uwm.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>  It appears the Twitter API doesn't care if you're selling or giving it
>>>> away, as I.4.a prohibits any attempt to "sell, rent, lease, sublicense,
>>>> redistribute, or syndicate access to the Twitter API or Twitter Content to
>>>> any third party without prior written approval from Twitter", as well as
>>>> noting that "Exporting Twitter Content to a datastore as a service or other
>>>> cloud based service, however, is not permitted"
>>>>
>>>>  http://dev.twitter.com/pages/api_terms
>>>>
>>>>  I'm not justifying their terms, but it does appear that you violated
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>>  -mz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  Michael Zimmer, PhD
>>>>  Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies
>>>>  Co-Director, Center for Information Policy Research
>>>>  University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>>>>  e: zimmerm at uwm.edu
>>>>  w: www.michaelzimmer.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On May 5, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Stuart Shulman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Twitter closed down our efforts to share post-Osama bin Laden Twitter
>>>>> data
>>>>>  (or any other collections) for research purposes, again citing their
>>>>> TOS &
>>>>>  API TOS.
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://bit.ly/l8DSA3
>>>>>
>>>>>  To be clear: we were giving the data away, not selling it. Also, it
>>>>> was not
>>>>>  scraped of Twitter. Rather, it was gathered using a Twitter-authorized
>>>>>  account and an API that lets us fetch 1500 items at a time.
>>>>>
>>>>>  It is a shame that the now 2 million tweets cannot, for example, be
>>>>> sampled
>>>>>  and coded using a crowd source model. Or could they?
>>>>>
>>>>>  I am assuming the provision against sharing data does not extend to
>>>>>  individuals who gather it and keep it to themselves or work with it in
>>>>> a
>>>>>  research team.
>>>>>
>>>>>  ~Stu
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>>
>>>>>  Stuart Shulman
>>>>>  President & CEO
>>>>>  Texifter, LLC <http://www.texifter.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Have you tried DiscoverText?
>>>>>  http://discovertext.com
>>>>>  *Featuring the Facebook Graph & Twitter APIs*
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>  The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>>>>>  is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers
>>>>> http://aoir.org
>>>>>  Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
>>>>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>>>>
>>>>>  Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>>>>>  http://www.aoir.org/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>
>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> http://www.aoir.org/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>



More information about the Air-L mailing list