[Air-L] Twitter Data Sharing Update - Thou Shalt Not Share Collections of Tweets

Stuart Shulman stuart.shulman at gmail.com
Thu May 5 07:35:02 PDT 2011


Hi Michael,

We did not contest the violation warning and so we took the data down. The
policy is another matter. These are tweets that yearn to be free, insofar as
tweets can collectively yearn for anything:

http://bit.ly/ixJVHu

In this instance, I find myself liking the Facebook policy, which in an
opposite manner sets data free. This may explain, in part, why the "Scraping
Facebook" video seems to be getting more views than the one on harvesting
Twitter tweets:

http://www.screencast.com/t/iW3rvdYY

~Stu

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Michael Zimmer <zimmerm at uwm.edu> wrote:

> It appears the Twitter API doesn't care if you're selling or giving it
> away, as I.4.a prohibits any attempt to "sell, rent, lease, sublicense,
> redistribute, or syndicate access to the Twitter API or Twitter Content to
> any third party without prior written approval from Twitter", as well as
> noting that "Exporting Twitter Content to a datastore as a service or other
> cloud based service, however, is not permitted"
>
> http://dev.twitter.com/pages/api_terms
>
> I'm not justifying their terms, but it does appear that you violated them.
>
> -mz
>
>
> --
> Michael Zimmer, PhD
> Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies
> Co-Director, Center for Information Policy Research
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> e: zimmerm at uwm.edu
> w: www.michaelzimmer.org
>
>
> On May 5, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Stuart Shulman wrote:
>
> Twitter closed down our efforts to share post-Osama bin Laden Twitter data
> (or any other collections) for research purposes, again citing their TOS &
> API TOS.
>
> http://bit.ly/l8DSA3
>
> To be clear: we were giving the data away, not selling it. Also, it was not
> scraped of Twitter. Rather, it was gathered using a Twitter-authorized
> account and an API that lets us fetch 1500 items at a time.
>
> It is a shame that the now 2 million tweets cannot, for example, be sampled
> and coded using a crowd source model. Or could they?
>
> I am assuming the provision against sharing data does not extend to
> individuals who gather it and keep it to themselves or work with it in a
> research team.
>
> ~Stu
>
> --
>
> Stuart Shulman
> President & CEO
> Texifter, LLC <http://www.texifter.com/>
>
>
>
> Have you tried DiscoverText?
> http://discovertext.com
> *Featuring the Facebook Graph & Twitter APIs*
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
>
>


-- 

Stuart Shulman
President & CEO
Texifter, LLC <http://www.texifter.com/>


Have you tried DiscoverText?
http://discovertext.com
*Featuring the Facebook Graph & Twitter APIs*



More information about the Air-L mailing list