[Air-L] Research on Twitter - a couple of questions
Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga
garaizar at deusto.es
Tue Jan 17 00:00:27 PST 2012
Hello,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:42:09 -0500 sava saheli singh
<savasaheli at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't claim to be an expert, but I am doing research on twitter
> > (very different aspects and data collection) and I will say this:
> 1. yes. many people do not geolocate their tweets or identify
> where they are, some have fictitious or humorous locations as well.
> while this in itself is not a problem, if it is being used as the
> only legitimate geographical identifier for data, I'd say that was
> problematic.
When tweets are gathered through Twitter's APIs, the accuracy of the
geolocation information is also provided in many ways (e.g., as a
geographical point's latitude and longitude, a polygon representing an
area, a unique ID referencing a know place...).
Some of them are very accurate (i.e., lat+long), and some of them are
not (i.e., a big polygon inferred from Geo-IP information, not GPS).
The good news is you can decide the accuracy level of your sample, and
understand why you're gathering apparently non-geolocated tweets from a
geolocated filter (e.g., get tweets near London).
Hope it helps ;-)
--
Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga
Universidad de Deusto
Avda. de las Universidades 24
48007 Bilbao - Spain
Phone: +34-94-4139000 Ext 2512
Fax: +34-94-4139101
More information about the Air-L
mailing list