[Air-L] FW: [bytesforall_readers] Fwd: Elsevier's Unforced Error

michael gurstein gurstein at gmail.com
Sat Dec 14 22:34:43 PST 2013


 

 

From: bytesforall_readers at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bytesforall_readers at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Subbiah
Arunachalam
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 12:42 PM
To: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum; Global Open Access List (Successor of
AmSci); bytesforall_readers at yahoogroups.com; LIS-Forum; oadl
Subject: [bytesforall_readers] Fwd: Elsevier's Unforced Error

 

  

If, after all this, the scientists of the world do not unite now and revive
the 'Boycott Elsevier' movement, we cannot blame the publisher hereafter. 

 

How can governments and funding bodies which support research remain silent
spectators and let publishing companies hijack the copyright to the research
results? 

 

Arun




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: LIBLICENSE <liblicense at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:43 AM
Subject: Elsevier's Unforced Error
To: LIBLICENSE-L at listserv.crl.edu


From: "Hamaker, Charles" <cahamake at uncc.edu>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:11:37

http://svpow.com/2013/12/06/elsevier-is-taking-down-papers-from-academia-edu
/

For those who are unhappy with decades of  Elsevier's policies,
practices, pricing, and even their recent purchase of Mendeley, their
unforced error in issuing take-down notices is an amazing, mistaken
and ultimately self-destructive decision on Elsevier's part.

Anyone who has any disagreement with Elsevier on any issue: copyright,
OA policies, hybrid journals, OA pricing,  pricing in general, control
of backfiles, text mining, any of a myriad of issues including, their
crazy if you mandate it you can't do it IR policy and their standard
refusal to permit re-printing "their"   research, should publicize
this far and wide.

Elsevier, no matter what they say, has demonstrated beyond any
reasonable doubt in this action, their limited understanding of their
remit, their control of scholarly research, They are nobody's
friend's except their shareholders. They have demonstrated  their DNA,
their belief in their right to  control the content scholars and
researchers create and publish with Elsevier. They are wrong.

What copyright law says is irrelevant in this, what authors want to do
with their own research is paramount.

It might have been masked before under the guise of impact factors and
 collegial editorial board meetings in locations worldwide and smart
as a whip  editors, and outreach at conferences, and invitations to
"publish your research with us"  and  PR, and more or less "green" OA
policies, and excellent inhouse readings of directions in future
trends, and all the other trappings and expertise they have in
academic publishing which is at the top of its game. Those trapping
are insufficient.

Elsevier and its cynical relationship with authors and institutions,
has been demonstrated by Elsevier itself. No one could have done this
to them but themselves.

The tide of OA, of authors making sure people who need to see it, get
to read their research, OA  in all its guises, is inexorable and if
handled correctly even by such behemoths as Elsevier, will lift all
boats in the publishing stream, despite  the scaremongers and
naysayers in publishing, or the mistaken advice of some in libraries,
or even among  OA advocates themselves. It's logic is persuasive, its
goals commensurate ultimately with what authors want for their own
research. To put up and enforce barriers to what scholars want to
distribute that they themselves produce is antediluvian.

Elsevier's unforced error may be more effective than any boycott.

Chuck Hamaker

 

__._,_.___


 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bytesforall_readers/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxbmJhM2J
uBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM1MTUzNjMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzM4BG1zZ0lkAzE1MzM
3BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTM4NzA4NjEzMQ--?act=reply&messageNum=15337
> Reply via web post 

 
<mailto:subbiah.arunachalam at gmail.com?subject=Re%3A%20Fwd%3A%20Elsevier%27s%
20Unforced%20Error> Reply to sender 

 
<mailto:bytesforall_readers at yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20Fwd%3A%20Elsevie
r%27s%20Unforced%20Error> Reply to group 

 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bytesforall_readers/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbDEyaHA
3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM1MTUzNjMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzM4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2x
rA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTM4NzA4NjEzMQ--> Start a New Topic 

 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bytesforall_readers/message/15337;_ylc=X3oDMT
M2M2JsajhrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM1MTUzNjMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzM4BG1zZ0
lkAzE1MzM3BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTM4NzA4NjEzMQR0cGNJZAMxNTMzNw-->
Messages in this topic (1) 

Recent Activity: 

 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bytesforall_readers;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbjdvNG8xBF9T
Azk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM1MTUzNjMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzM4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3Zn
aHAEc3RpbWUDMTM4NzA4NjEzMQ--> Visit Your Group 

 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkcDlhM3UwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzM1M
TUzNjMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzM4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMzg3MDg2MTMx>
Yahoo! Groups

Switch to:
<mailto:bytesforall_readers-traditional at yahoogroups.com?subject=Change%20Del
ivery%20Format:%20Traditional> Text-Only,
<mailto:bytesforall_readers-digest at yahoogroups.com?subject=Email%20Delivery:
%20Digest> Daily Digest .
<mailto:bytesforall_readers-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
Unsubscribe .  <http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> Terms of
Use .
<mailto:ygroupsnotifications at yahoogroups.com?subject=Feedback%20on%20the%20r
edesigned%20individual%20mail%20v1> Send us Feedback 

.

 
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=3515363/grpspId=1705004738/msgId
=15337/stime=1387086131> 

__,_._,___




More information about the Air-L mailing list