[Air-L] request for suggestions - Internet regulation vis-a-vis pornography / privacy etc.

Nathan Fisk fiskn at rpi.edu
Thu Aug 7 15:57:50 PDT 2014


Hello Charles,

For an easier/shorter/supplemental read, I would suggest chapter 8 out of Kimmel’s “Guyland” (Kimmel, M. S. (2008). Guyland: the perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper.). He does a good job of setting up pornography consumption as a performance of masculinity for (white, college educated) 18-24 year olds. Softcore/lad magazines (Maxim, Sports Illustrated) become a form of reassurance, violent pornography becomes a form of compensation/revenge fantasy in the wake of civil rights movements. More generally, he notes the ways in which different demographic groups consume pornography for different, and culturally situated reasons. Has sparked a number of uncomfortable and interesting discussion in my undergraduate courses.

-Nate Fisk

On Aug 7, 2014, at 6:00 PM, air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org wrote:

> Send Air-L mailing list submissions to
> 	air-l at listserv.aoir.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	air-l-owner at listserv.aoir.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. request for suggestions - Internet regulation vis-a-vis
>      pornography / privacy etc. (Charles Ess)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:49:04 +0200
> From: Charles Ess <charles.ess at gmail.com>
> To: Air list <air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: [Air-L] request for suggestions - Internet regulation
> 	vis-a-vis pornography / privacy etc.
> Message-ID: <D0092640.9F36A%charles.ess at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I teach a MA course titled  "Pornography, Protection, Power" which is
> centrally focused on questions of who / what _should_/_could_ (both huge
> questions, of course) attempt to regulate Internet-facilitated
> communication vis-a-vis _possible_ limits to free expression, e.g.,
> pornography, libel, "clear and present danger" tests in the U.S.
> (especially since 9/11), and so on (and, rest assured, with a thousand
> historical / cultural / political caveats).
> 
> As I've come to structure the course, I focus on the theme of emancipation
> as a core norm - one that underlies primary justifications of democratic
> polity and correlative norms of equality, privacy, and freedom of
> expression (among others).  The course includes:
> 
> A) a good dose of readings on pornography - as a "classical" limit on
> freedom of expression - including diverse cultural and historical
> observations, with a particular focus on the now long debate over porn as
> legitimately protected either free expression and/or as emancipatory in
> its own right;
> 
> B) a good dose of readings on democratic polity, with specific attention
> to the central importance of freedom of expression for both individual
> self-development and democratic debate and processes more broadly;
> a particular focus here is on the rights of children in all of this, as
> brilliantly exposited by my colleague Elisabeth Staksrud in her _Children
> in the Online World: Risk, Regulation, Rights_ (2013);
> 
> C) a very strong dose of readings (primarily from Mansell and Raboy, The
> Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy) on the history of
> efforts (initially in "Western" countries) to regulate communication
> media, beginning with print - and highlighting the contrasts between such
> efforts as new media technologies emerge, beginning with the telegraph and
> telephone / broadcast media / and then the rise of the Internet as
> challenging / blurring earlier definitions and regimes;
> 
> D) a large theme here is the broad shift, starting ca. 1970s away from
> national-state centered support and control of broadcast media (especially
> in the European and Scandinavian contexts with their strong traditions of
> public service broadcasting) towards neo-liberal de/re-regulation of media
> - leading to an ever increasing ownership and control of media by private
> companies and multinational corporations, with Google, Apple, Facebook,
> and others as the primary / usual suspects;
> 
> E) some readings on copyright, copying, and creativity (where efforts to
> define and protect patents and copyright inspire [largely futile] efforts
> to regulate / control file-sharing, etc.); and
> 
> F) a small unit on "liberation technology," as reflected in contemporary
> work on circumventing state censorship of the Internet in any number of
> countries (using Walid Al-Saqaf's _alkasir_ software as a primary example
> from the Arabic-speaking world).
> 
> WHAT I'M ASKING HELP WITH ...
> 1) any additional readings that you might suggest, as either primary or
> optional?
> For example, in the direction of policy readings, I've been working
> through Sandra Braman's _Change of State: Information, Policy, and Power_
> (MIT: 2012), which is just terrific, especially for articulating the U.S.
> side of things, and will add some selections to supplant the current
> readings as more E.U./Scandinavian-oriented.  But I'm sure more good
> material is "out there" to be considered
> 
> 2) suggestions for case-studies, especially suited for in-class debate?
> For example, I am thinking of beginning with Facebook - both the recent
> study on 600,000+ users, coupled with the upcoming class-action lawsuit
> spearheaded by the Austrian law student Max Schrems.  The idea is to call
> attention to a current, real-world conflict between (perceived) users'
> rights (as articulated and, ideally, defended by liberal-democratic
> regimes) and corporately-owned Internet-based communication venues.  So
> specific resources here would be helpful -
> As would suggestions for other case-studies that would be suited
> especially for in-class analysis, discussion, and debate.
> Edward Snowden's case is an obvious candidate, along with Wiki-leaks -
> again, useful resources would be appreciated -
> But I'm sure there are other, more country-specific cases that would be
> very pertinent and lively for the students.
> 
> With a thousand thanks in advance for reading this far and for any
> suggestions you may have to offer -
> 
> - charles ess
> Professor in Media Studies
> Department of Media and Communication
> Director, Centre for Research on Media Innovations
> <http://www.hf.uio.no/imk/english/research/center/media-innovations/>
> Editor, The Journal of Media Innovations
> <https://www.journals.uio.no/index.php/TJMI/>
> 
> My latest book, Digital Media Ethics, is now available from Polity:
> http://www.politybooks.com/book.asp?ref=0745656056
> 
> University of Oslo 
> P.O. Box 1093 Blindern
> NO-0317 
> Oslo Norway
> email: charles.ess at media.uio.no
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> 
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Air-L Digest, Vol 121, Issue 8
> *************************************
> 




More information about the Air-L mailing list