Wed May 7 22:43:13 PDT 2014
Society, 15 (3): 53-70.
Butler-Smith, Paul, Samuel Cameron, and Alan Collins. 1998. Gender =
differences in mate search effort: an exploratory economic analysis of =
personal advertisements. Applied Economics, 30 (10): 1277-1285.
Cameron, Samuel, and Alan Collins. 2000. Random utility maximiser seeks =
similar: An economic analysis of commitment level in personal =
relationships. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21 (1): 73-90.
Chenault, Brittney G. 1998. Developing Personal and Emotional =
Relationships Via Computer-Mediated Communication. Computer-Mediated =
Communication Magazine, May 1998 5 (5).
Clark, Lynn Schofield. 1998. Dating on the Net: Teens and the Rise of =
"Pure" Relationships. In Cybersociety 2.0, edited by S. Jones. Thousand =
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cooper, Alvin, and Leda Sportolari. 1997. Romance in Cyberspace: =
Understanding Online Attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, =
22 (1): 7-14.
Fletcher, Garth J. O., Jeffry A. Simpson, and Geoff Thomas. 2000. The =
measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory =
factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, =
March 26 (3): 340-354.
Guiterres, Sara E., Douglas T. Kenrick, and Jenifer J. Partch. 1999. =
Beauty, dominance, and the mating game: Contrast effects in =
self-assessment reflect gender differences in mate selection. =
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, September 1999 25 (9): =
Jagger, Elizabeth. 1998. Marketing the Self, Buying an Other: Dating in =
a Post Modern, Consumer Society. Sociology: The Journal of the British =
Sociological Association, November 1998 32 (4): 795-814.
Jones, Steve, ed. 1999. Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and =
Methods for Examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lea, Martin, and Russell Spears. 1995. Love at First Byte? Building =
Personal Relationships Over Computer Networks. In Under-Studied =
Relationships. Off the Beaten Track, edited by J. T. Wood and S. Duck. =
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lindholm, Charles. 1998. Love and Structure. Theory Culture and Society, =
15 (3): 243 - 263.
McRae, Shannon. 1996. Coming Apart at the Seams: Sex, Text and the =
Virtual Body. In Wired Women: Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace, =
edited by L. Cherny and E. R. Weise. Washington: Seal Press.
Peterson, Karen S. 1999. Personal Ads Get Back to Nature: Each Sex =
Offers What the Other Wants. USA Today, 23 November 1999.
Raybeck, Douglas, Stephanie Dorenbosch, Michael Sarapata, and Douglas =
Herrman. 1996. SWF ISO LTR: The Quest For Love And Meaning In The =
Personals. Paper read at 98th Annual Meeting of the American =
Anthropological Association, at Chicago IL.
Regan, Pamela C. 1998. What if you can't get what you want? Willingness =
to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate =
value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology =
Bulletin, December 1998 24 (12): 1294-1303.
Rice, Ronald E., and Gail Love. 1987. Electronic Emotion. Socioemotional =
Content in a Computer-Mediated Communication Network. Communication =
Research, February 1987 14 (1): 85-108.
Sagan, Dorion. 1995. Sex, Lies, and Cyberspace. Wired, January.
Turkle, Sherry. 1997. Constructions and Reconstructions of Self in =
Virtual Reality: Playing in the MUDs. In Culture of the Internet, edited =
by S. Kiesler. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wallace, Patricia. 1999. The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, UK: =
Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, Barry. 2001. Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of =
Personalized Networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional =
Research, 25 (2): 227 - 252. Available from =
Witmer, Diane F. 1997. Risky Business: Why People Feel Safe in Sexually =
Explicit On-Line Communication. Journal of Computer Mediated =
Communication, June 2 (4). Available from =
More information about the Air-L