[Air-L] Air-L Digest, Vol 129, Issue 24

Anne Helmond anne at digitalmethods.net
Tue Apr 21 01:39:51 PDT 2015


Hi Dan,

We published a paper on the history of the Dutch blogosphere which we
reconstructed using 10 years of Internet Archive Wayback Machine data:
Weltevrede, Esther, and Anne Helmond. “Where Do Bloggers Blog?
Platform Transitions within the Historical Dutch Blogosphere.” First
Monday 17.2 (2012):
<http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3775/3142>.

It's a methodological contribution which also deals with the
affordances and limitations of using the IA WB as a mode to capture
data. The paper describes our method in detail. We created tools
specifically for this research project to capture the data. The tool
has since been made public and is available online at:
https://tools.digitalmethods.net/beta/internetArchiveWaybackMachineLinkRipper/
and https://tools.digitalmethods.net/beta/waybackNetworkPerYear/

Rudolf Ammann has also used IA data to reconstruct the (US)
blogosphere: Rudolf Ammann, 2009. “Blogosphere 1998: Analysis,” at
http://tawawa.org/ark/2009/11/5/blogosphere-1998-analysis.html,
accessed 1 September 2011.
Ammann, R. K. “Weblogs 1994 – 2000: A Genealogy.” Doctoral. UCL
(University College London), 2013. discovery.ucl.ac.uk. Web. 21 Apr.
2015. <http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1399845/>.

This project page addresses the limitations of the Internet Archive
Wayback Machine's focus on the single website/the single URL interface
for data retrieval:
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/SpecialCollectionMaker

Concerning the validity of the Internet Archive I would recommend the following:
Murphy, Jamie, Noor Hazarina Hashim, and Peter O’Connor. “Take Me
Back: Validating the Wayback Machine.” Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication 13.1 (2007): 60–75. Wiley Online Library. Web. 20 Mar.
2013.
Thelwall, Mike, and Liwen Vaughan. “A Fair History of the Web?
Examining Country Balance in the Internet Archive.” Library &
Information Science Research 26.2 (2004): 162–176. ScienceDirect. Web.
21 Apr. 2015

And this one is on my to-read list:
Dougherty, Meghan, and Eric T. Meyer. “Community, Tools, and Practices
in Web Archiving: The State-of-the-Art in Relation to Social Science
and Humanities Research Needs.” Journal of the Association for
Information Science and Technology 65.11 (2014): 2195–2209. Wiley
Online Library. Web. 21 Apr. 2015.

- Anne

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:00 AM,  <air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org> wrote:
> Send Air-L mailing list submissions to
>         air-l at listserv.aoir.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         air-l-owner at listserv.aoir.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: "Construction" of Users (Gabriel Mugar)
>    2. Using the Archive.org for data capture? (Dan Fielding)
>    3. Re: Using the Archive.org for data capture? (Matthew T Mccarthy)
>    4. Re: Using the Archive.org for data capture? (Matthew T Mccarthy)
>    5. Re: Using the Archive.org for data capture? (Matthew Weber)
>    6. Re: Using the Archive.org for data capture? (Anat Ben-David)
>    7. Re: "Construction" of Users (Neal Thomas)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:12:02 +0000
> From: Gabriel Mugar <gmugar at syr.edu>
> To: Alex Leavitt <alexleavitt at gmail.com>
> Cc: aoir list <air-l at aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] "Construction" of Users
> Message-ID: <73C0C74B-74FA-4FDA-B837-0537255C1305 at syr.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> You might like Ekbia and Nardi?s work on Inverse Instrumentality.
>
> Ekbia, H. R., & Nardi, B. A. (2012). Inverse Instrumentality: How Technologies Objectify Patients and Players. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (pp. 157?176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
>
> Best,
>
> Gabriel
>
> Gabriel Mugar
> Doctoral Candidate, Syracuse University
> Information Science and Technology
> www.buildingthecommons.org<http://www.buildingthecommons.org>
> @gmugar
>
> On Apr 20, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Alex Leavitt <alexleavitt at gmail.com<mailto:alexleavitt at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi AoIR!
>
> I'm looking for resources on constructions of the user. I know there's some
> cultural studies work in this area (e.g., Oudshoorn & Pinch, "How Users
> Matter"), but I'm looking for a little more from the technical/design/HCI
> side: namely, how users are constructed technically within computational
> systems.
>
> Does anyone have any recommendations?
>
> Alex
>
> ---
>
> Alexander Leavitt
> PhD Candidate
> USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
> http://alexleavitt.com
> Twitter: @alexleavitt <http://twitter.com/alexleavitt>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:28:29 -0700
> From: Dan Fielding <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>
> To: Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
> Subject: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
> Message-ID:
>         <CAD4ha1bx4CphcS2yz2uD_wKymCoxU7MZbfbB4wFjfV-b0+NqAQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hello wonderful list,
>
> I am currently establishing a research protocol that will rely on the
> wayback machine (archive.org) to gather caches of pages from 1-2 years ago.
> Is there research on the wayback machine as an effective mode of data
> capture? Are there any questions about its validity? Have you read
> published work using the wayback machine? What concerns have other scholars
> raised about using it?
>
> Thanks for your time! Have a great day,
>
> Dan Fielding
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:43:31 +0000
> From: Matthew T Mccarthy <mccart74 at uwm.edu>
> To: Dan Fielding <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>,
>         "Air-L at listserv.aoir.org"       <Air-L at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
> Message-ID: <1429562610708.53877 at uwm.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dan,
>
> Richard Rogers of the Digital Methods Initiative has dealt with this.
>
>
> Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT press.
>
>
> Matthew T. McCarthy
> Ph.D. Student/Graduate Instructor
> Department of Sociology
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> P.O. Box 413
> Milwaukee, WI   53201
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Dan Fielding <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:28 PM
> To: Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
> Subject: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
>
> Hello wonderful list,
>
> I am currently establishing a research protocol that will rely on the
> wayback machine (archive.org) to gather caches of pages from 1-2 years ago.
> Is there research on the wayback machine as an effective mode of data
> capture? Are there any questions about its validity? Have you read
> published work using the wayback machine? What concerns have other scholars
> raised about using it?
>
> Thanks for your time! Have a great day,
>
> Dan Fielding
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:46:09 +0000
> From: Matthew T Mccarthy <mccart74 at uwm.edu>
> To: Dan Fielding <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>,
>         "Air-L at listserv.aoir.org"       <Air-L at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
> Message-ID: <1429562766067.45177 at uwm.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Apologies for the curt message. I hit send before finishing.
> In addition to the citation for his book, here is a link to the Ditigal Methods Initiative wikipage
>
> https://wiki.digitalmethods.net
>
> Best,
> Matt
>
>
> Matthew T. McCarthy
> Ph.D. Student/Graduate Instructor
> Department of Sociology
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> P.O. Box 413
> Milwaukee, WI   53201
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Matthew T Mccarthy <mccart74 at uwm.edu>
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:43 PM
> To: Dan Fielding; Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
>
> Dan,
>
> Richard Rogers of the Digital Methods Initiative has dealt with this.
>
>
> Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT press.
>
>
> Matthew T. McCarthy
> Ph.D. Student/Graduate Instructor
> Department of Sociology
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> P.O. Box 413
> Milwaukee, WI   53201
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Dan Fielding <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:28 PM
> To: Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
> Subject: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
>
> Hello wonderful list,
>
> I am currently establishing a research protocol that will rely on the
> wayback machine (archive.org) to gather caches of pages from 1-2 years ago.
> Is there research on the wayback machine as an effective mode of data
> capture? Are there any questions about its validity? Have you read
> published work using the wayback machine? What concerns have other scholars
> raised about using it?
>
> Thanks for your time! Have a great day,
>
> Dan Fielding
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:54:38 -0400
> From: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber at rutgers.edu>
> To: Dan Fielding <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Air-L at listserv.aoir.org" <Air-L at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
> Message-ID: <076B902B-5154-496C-8A77-7B7F1003FF02 at rutgers.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=utf-8
>
> Dan,
>
> Rogers? digital methods work is a broad starting point, although I?m not sure that he?s specifically addressed issues with the Internet Archive.
>
> I?ve been working on research derived from the Internet Archive for almost a decade now, mostly at a large scale, although some projects are smaller in nature. One starting point might be this paper http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2579213 <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2579213>  and I have some other published work using derived datasets.
>
> With regards to your question about validity, it depends in part on what you?re looking to explore. If you?re using smaller datasets, validity won?t be too much of an issue, but once you scale beyond a few dozen domains (and again, depending on your analysis and RQs) there are validity issues that must be addressed. We?ve started to outline these in a few related papers that are under review but mostly it pertains to issues of sampling error and data completeness.
>
> Feel free to ping me offline - I can point you to GitHub code and other work, depending on your goals - and definitely check out the work of others. Kalev Letaaru is active on here and works in this space, as does Neils Brugger at Aarhus. There is a growing community of researchers doing Internet Archive-related research.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Apr 20, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Matthew T Mccarthy <mccart74 at uwm.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Apologies for the curt message. I hit send before finishing.
>> In addition to the citation for his book, here is a link to the Ditigal Methods Initiative wikipage
>>
>> https://wiki.digitalmethods.net
>>
>> Best,
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> Matthew T. McCarthy
>> Ph.D. Student/Graduate Instructor
>> Department of Sociology
>> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>> P.O. Box 413
>> Milwaukee, WI   53201
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Matthew T Mccarthy <mccart74 at uwm.edu>
>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:43 PM
>> To: Dan Fielding; Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
>> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>> Richard Rogers of the Digital Methods Initiative has dealt with this.
>>
>>
>> Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT press.
>>
>>
>> Matthew T. McCarthy
>> Ph.D. Student/Graduate Instructor
>> Department of Sociology
>> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>> P.O. Box 413
>> Milwaukee, WI   53201
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Dan Fielding <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:28 PM
>> To: Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
>> Subject: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
>>
>> Hello wonderful list,
>>
>> I am currently establishing a research protocol that will rely on the
>> wayback machine (archive.org) to gather caches of pages from 1-2 years ago.
>> Is there research on the wayback machine as an effective mode of data
>> capture? Are there any questions about its validity? Have you read
>> published work using the wayback machine? What concerns have other scholars
>> raised about using it?
>>
>> Thanks for your time! Have a great day,
>>
>> Dan Fielding
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>
>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> http://www.aoir.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>
>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> http://www.aoir.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>
>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> http://www.aoir.org/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:08:56 +0300
> From: Anat Ben-David <anatbd at gmail.com>
> To: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber at rutgers.edu>
> Cc: "Air-L at listserv.aoir.org" <Air-L at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
> Message-ID:
>         <CAFiVF1XBJdoT2DN3kj6YJGxjX2zgngg9FrY8MyHb_3SwhgKTtA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Dear Dan,
>
> Below please find a list of studies that used data captured from archive.org
> :
>  John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. *New
> Media & Society*. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684
>  Murphy, J., Hashim, N. H., & O?Connor, P. (2007). Take me back: validating
> the Wayback Machine. *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*, *13*(1),
> 60?75.
>  Weltevrede, E., & Helmond, A. (2012). Where do bloggers blog? Platform
> transitions within the historical Dutch blogosphere. *First Monday*, *17*(2-6).
> Retrieved from
> http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3775
>
> On methodological challenges:
> Br?gger, N. (2010). *Web history*. Peter Lang Pub Incorporated.
>  Br?gger, N. (2012). Historical Network Analysis of the Web. *Social
> Science Computer Review*. Retrieved from
> http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/09/06/0894439312454267.abstract
> Rogers, R. (2013). The Website as Archived Object. In *Digital Methods*
> (pp. 61?82). MIT press Cambridge, MA.
> Ben-David, Anat, & Huurdeman, Hugo C. (2014). Web Archive Search as
> Research: Methodological and Theoretical Implications. *Alexandria*, *25*
> (1).
>  Best wishes,
> anat
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Matthew Weber <matthew.weber at rutgers.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Dan,
>>
>> Rogers? digital methods work is a broad starting point, although I?m not
>> sure that he?s specifically addressed issues with the Internet Archive.
>>
>> I?ve been working on research derived from the Internet Archive for almost
>> a decade now, mostly at a large scale, although some projects are smaller
>> in nature. One starting point might be this paper
>> http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2579213 <
>> http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2579213>  and I have some other
>> published work using derived datasets.
>>
>> With regards to your question about validity, it depends in part on what
>> you?re looking to explore. If you?re using smaller datasets, validity won?t
>> be too much of an issue, but once you scale beyond a few dozen domains (and
>> again, depending on your analysis and RQs) there are validity issues that
>> must be addressed. We?ve started to outline these in a few related papers
>> that are under review but mostly it pertains to issues of sampling error
>> and data completeness.
>>
>> Feel free to ping me offline - I can point you to GitHub code and other
>> work, depending on your goals - and definitely check out the work of
>> others. Kalev Letaaru is active on here and works in this space, as does
>> Neils Brugger at Aarhus. There is a growing community of researchers doing
>> Internet Archive-related research.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 20, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Matthew T Mccarthy <mccart74 at uwm.edu>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Apologies for the curt message. I hit send before finishing.
>> > In addition to the citation for his book, here is a link to the Ditigal
>> Methods Initiative wikipage
>> >
>> > https://wiki.digitalmethods.net
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Matt
>> >
>> >
>> > Matthew T. McCarthy
>> > Ph.D. Student/Graduate Instructor
>> > Department of Sociology
>> > University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>> > P.O. Box 413
>> > Milwaukee, WI   53201
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Matthew T
>> Mccarthy <mccart74 at uwm.edu>
>> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:43 PM
>> > To: Dan Fielding; Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
>> >
>> > Dan,
>> >
>> > Richard Rogers of the Digital Methods Initiative has dealt with this.
>> >
>> >
>> > Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT press.
>> >
>> >
>> > Matthew T. McCarthy
>> > Ph.D. Student/Graduate Instructor
>> > Department of Sociology
>> > University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>> > P.O. Box 413
>> > Milwaukee, WI   53201
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Dan Fielding
>> <sociologyfornerds at gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 3:28 PM
>> > To: Air-L at listserv.aoir.org
>> > Subject: [Air-L] Using the Archive.org for data capture?
>> >
>> > Hello wonderful list,
>> >
>> > I am currently establishing a research protocol that will rely on the
>> > wayback machine (archive.org) to gather caches of pages from 1-2 years
>> ago.
>> > Is there research on the wayback machine as an effective mode of data
>> > capture? Are there any questions about its validity? Have you read
>> > published work using the wayback machine? What concerns have other
>> scholars
>> > raised about using it?
>> >
>> > Thanks for your time! Have a great day,
>> >
>> > Dan Fielding
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>> >
>> > Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> > http://www.aoir.org/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>> >
>> > Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> > http://www.aoir.org/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>> >
>> > Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> > http://www.aoir.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>
>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> http://www.aoir.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Anat Ben-David, PhD
>
>
> Department of Sociology, Political Science, and Communication
> The Open University
> 1 University Road, P.O.Box 808, Ra'anana 43537, Israel
>
> Tel: +972-9-778-1147
> Twitter: @anatbd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:20:45 -0400
> From: Neal Thomas <neal at hivemedia.ca>
> To: air-l at listserv.aoir.org, Alex Leavitt <alexleavitt at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] "Construction" of Users
> Message-ID: <55356DAD.9030808 at hivemedia.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
>
> Hi Alex --
>
> You might get something out of an extended debate that occurred in the
> mid-nineties in the journal CSCW, around Terry Winograd's
> Language/Action Perspective:
>
> Winograd, Terry. 1987. ?A Language/Action Perspective in the Design of
> Cooperative Work? in Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 3, p.3-30.
> Suchman, Lucy. 1994. ?Do Categories Have Politics? The language/action
> perspective reconsidered? in Computer Supported Cooperative Work
> (CSCW):2, p.177-190.
> Winograd, Terry. 1994. ?Categories, Disciplines, and Social
> Coordination? in CSCW:2, p.191-197.
> Agre, Philip E. 1995. ?Accountability and Discipline: A Comment on
> Suchman and Winograd? in CSCW:3, p.31-35.
> Bogen, David. 1995. ?Do Winograd and Flores have politics?? in CSCW:3,
> p.79-83.
> Button, Graham. 1995. ?What?s Wrong with Speech-Act Theory? in CSCW:3,
> p.39-42.
> Curtis, Bill. 1995. ?Can Speech Acts Walk the Talk?? in CSCW:3, p.61-64.
> Lynch, Michael. 1995. ?On Making Explicit? in CSCW:3, p.65-68.
> Randall, D.W. 1995. ?A Comment on Lucy Suchman?s ?Do Categories Have
> Politics??? in CSCW:3, p.47-50.
> Suchman, Lucy. 1995. ?Speech Acts and Voices: Response to Winograd et
> al.? in CSCW:3, p.85-95.
>
> ...and related books:
>
> Agre, Philip. 1997. Computation and Human Experience.
> Suchman, Lucy. 2006. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated
> Actions.
> Winograd & Flores. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New
> Foundation for Design.
> Dourish, Paul. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied
> Interaction.
>
> Best,
> Neal
>
>
> --
> ___________
> Neal Thomas
> Assistant Professor of Media and Technology Studies
> Department of Communication Studies
> The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3285 USA
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Air-L Digest, Vol 129, Issue 24
> **************************************


More information about the Air-L mailing list