[Air-L] agency / neutrality of algorithms
berno.rieder at gmail.com
Tue May 31 00:53:15 PDT 2016
Personally, I think that the notion of algorithm is way to broad to talk about “neutrality” (again, super vague) in very interesting terms.
But I would really recommend the volume by Custers et al. on Data Mining (http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3). They get the technology right (half of the authors are from CS/IS), but also they put something of substance behind the notion of neutrality.
Also, this paper by Barocas and Selbst on Big Data’s “disparate impact” (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2477899) is simply spectacular.
> On 30 May 2016, at 21:36 , Alex Gekker <gekker.alex at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
> I've been running into a lot of writing criticising the notion of
> "algorithms are neutral" recently, but yet to find a scholarly work that
> tackles the subject yet. Any recommendations?
> Here are some examples for the types of arguments I'm interested in:
> Alex Gekker, PhD Candidate (Promovendus), Media and Culture, Utrecht
> Charting the Digital http://www.digitalcartography.eu/
> a.gekker at uu.nl <//a.gekker at uu.nl> |
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
More information about the Air-L