[Air-L] Discussion platform suggestions?

Nathaniel Poor natpoor at gmail.com
Sun Sep 25 05:39:36 PDT 2016


We use Slack at the office and I believe it does all of those things.



> On Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Josie Anne Reade <j.reade at student.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> 
> Just checking it out now, thank you very much for the suggestion!
> 
> 
> 
> Josie  
> 
> 
> 
> From: Mathias Klang <mathiasklang at gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 2:00 PM
> To: Josie Reade <j.reade at student.unimelb.edu.au>, <air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Discussion platform suggestions?
> 
> 
> 
> Have you tried or looked at Slack?
> 
> 
> 
> Mathias 
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Mathias Klang, 
> Associate Professor,
> Political Communication UMass Boston
> www.klangable.com @klangable
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:24 PM -0400, "Josie Anne Reade" <j.reade at student.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> 
> I am wondering if anyone on this mailing list is able to suggest a third party discussion platform that meets the below criteria.
> 
> 
> 
> FUNTIONALITY: Allow group members to create a new post, comment on existing posts, add photos and videos/voice recordings. Allow administrators to perform all group member functions as well as approve and/or delete group members posts when necessary.
> 
> 
> 
> ACCESSIBILITY: Accessible on a range of devices such as desktops, tablet computers and smartphones (Android and iOS operating systems). Easy to navigate user interface.
> 
> 
> 
> PRIVACY: Discussion needs to remain private and only visible to group members via log in. Group members must be able to either create their own username or be assigned a username, without it having to be their full name or connected to any of their existing social media profiles (hence even though a secret Facebook group would be convenient and easy to use for participants, it is not suitable as group members are able to see each other’s names).
> 
> 
> 
> I am a research assistant on a project that seeks to use this method to elicit responses from a cohort of 530 participants and augment the project’s existing use of interviews and workshops.
> 
> 
> 
> I have looked at Reddit, Muut and Google Groups but they don’t seem to quite tick all of the boxes. Also in conversation with EthOS.
> 
> 
> 
> Any suggestions or tips welcome. Thank you in advance!
> 
> Josie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> 
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> 
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/

-------------------------------
Nathaniel Poor, Ph.D.
https://github.com/natpoor
http://natpoor.blogspot.com/
https://sites.google.com/site/natpoor/
http://www.underwood-institute.org/




More information about the Air-L mailing list