[Air-L] 2018 Review Process

Michael T Zimmer zimmerm at uwm.edu
Thu May 3 09:22:26 PDT 2018


Could we consider dropping the 20% weight for “Presentation”? I don’t think one’s proficiency with English and MS Word is equally as important as “Significance”. 


--
Michael Zimmer, PhD
Associate Professor, School of Information Studies
Director, Center for Information Policy Research
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

e: zimmerm at uwm.edu
t: @michaelzimmer
w: www.michaelzimmer.org


> On May 3, 2018, at 11:52 AM, Kate Miltner <kmiltner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I’m Kate, the AoIR Exec Grad Rep. This year, the AoIR Exec and conference
> committee implemented some changes to the review process based on feedback
> from last year. The conference committee spent a lot of time and energy
> moderating the results of the reviewing process and weeding out
> inappropriate reviews, but it has come to our attention that some still
> slipped through.
> 
> In order to make further improvements in time for AoIR 2019, if you’ve had
> a review that was clearly inappropriate or uncollegial, please send that
> review to me at miltner at usc dot edu.
> 
> Thanks!
> Kate
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> 
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/



More information about the Air-L mailing list