[Air-L] Oxford Programme in Comparative Media Law & Policy Online Webinar this Thursday

Mon May 11 02:02:04 PDT 2020

Hi all,

Hope you're staying safe and well!

Just sharing that PCMLP (at the University of Oxford) will be hosting an
online Global Seminar Series talk this Thursday (May 14th) with Antonina
Cherevko (Adviser, International Media Support) at 14:00 (UK time).

*The talk abstract and info for joining the Zoom webinar are below.* More
info about the talk, including recommended readings are available on the*
PCMLP website
<https://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/event/freedom-of-expression-the-weaponization-of-information-with-antonina-cherevko-adviser-international-media-support/>*.
We look forward to ‘seeing you’ (virtually) there!

Best wishes,
Kira Allmann (Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Media Law & Policy
<https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/people/kira-allmann>, Centre for Socio-Legal
Studies)

*ABOUT THE TALK*

*Presentation by Antonina Cherevko, Adviser, International Media Support
(mediasupport.org <http://mediasupport.org>): Weaponization of information
and attacks on “information sovereignty” – would freedom of expression
standards suffice to tame the “information wars”? *
A liberal stance, traditionally supported by the intergovernmental and
non-governmental actors and confirmed by the international courts,[1]
suggests that insulting, offensive and shocking speech should also be
protected, especially as in line with the theory of the ‘free marketplace
of ideas’, we are accustomed to believe that truth and reason are destined
to win over harmful and/or false speech.  This is, however, not exactly
what has been happening at least since the end of 2013, when both
traditional media, online outlets and social media networks started to be
actively used for the purposeful, well-organized and coordinated
disinformation campaigns. For instance, the massive research of Twitter
posts proves that disinformation largely outplays true messages,[2] which
makes it an easy and attractive method for pursuing various political
purposes via dissemination of ‘weaponised’ narratives.

The term ‘weaponization of information’ was coined to define the use of
information (and free speech rights) as a weapon in the framework of
Russia’s aggressive foreign policy:[3] first, as a response to the
EuroMaidan protests in Ukraine in late 2013, then in the course of the
illegal annexation of Crimea and subsequent conflict in the east of
Ukraine, and finally as a means of meddling in Brexit, the US presidential
elections of 2016 as well as various elections and political processes in
Europe (French and German elections, Catalonia unrest etc.). While the term
originated in the European region and is currently closely associated with
Russia’s state backed media and foreign policy, it has been gaining global
popularity during the past several years, and can be easily replicated by
other authoritarian regimes with international ambitions (like, for
example, Iran and its recent disinformation campaigns)[4] because it allows
for a great deal of asymmetrical influence and is heavily enhanced by the
mere nature of modern instant communications.

There has been little attempt to explore the phenomenon of weaponization of
information in the context of human rights and the concepts of freedom of
expression, legitimate limitations of it, and abuse of rights. Whether the
existent international legal framework is able to protect the very essence
of freedom of expression from abuse by ill-intentioned actors in times when
‘theories of speech and society are under intense examination’[5] is not
merely a theoretical question, it may well become the question of further
preservation and survival of the value-based system that we currently rely
upon.

[1] Handyside v. the United Kingdom, Application No.5493/72 (ECtHR,
judgment of 07 December 1976), para 49

[2] Robinson Meyer, ‘The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake
News’ (The Atlantic, 8 March 2018) <
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/largest-study-ever-fake-news-mit-twitter/555104/>
accessed 19 March 2018.

[3] P Pomerantsev, M Weiss, The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin
Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money (The Institute of Modern Russia
2014) p.14.

[4] Gabrielle Lim, Etienne Maynier, John Scott-Railton, Alberto Fittarelli,
Ned Moran, and Ron Deibert, ‘Burned After Reading. Endless Mayfly’s
Ephemeral Disinformation Campaign’ (THECITIZENLAB, 14 May 2019) <
https://citizenlab.ca/2019/05/burned-after-reading-endless-mayflys-ephemeral-disinformation-campaign/?fbclid=IwAR2mWzf91EYhckgjwbHP9ARiX-RQSRnaYlW3qWeDzOBWPdYMtE_r7XtzP-c&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=kremlin_watch_briefing_major_iranian_disinformation_campaign_exposed&utm_term=2019-06-30>
accessed 29 June 2019

[5] Monroe Price, Nicole Stremlau, Speech and Society in Turbulent Times:
Freedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University
Press 2018) p.317.

*ZOOM WEBINAR INFO*
When: May 14, 2020 14:00 London
Topic: PCMLP Global Seminar Series: “Freedom of Expression & the
Weaponization of Information” (with Antonina Cherevko, Adviser,
International Media Support)

*Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89033217271?pwd=dTl5eGVwVWk5U2wySGdoTkVKUi8zZz09
<https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89033217271?pwd=dTl5eGVwVWk5U2wySGdoTkVKUi8zZz09>Password:
937028*

 Or iPhone one-tap :
United Kingdom: +442030512874,,89033217271#,,1#,937028# or
+442034815237,,89033217271#,,1#,937028#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
United Kingdom: +44 203 051 2874 or +44 203 481 5237 or +44 203 481 5240 or
+44 131 460 1196
US: +1 929 205 6099 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626
6799 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 6833

*Webinar ID: 890 3321 7271Password: 937028*
International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdXj3HBZGI