[Air-L] CFP: Dead and Dying Platforms: The Poetics, Politics, and Perils of Internet History | Deadline Sept. 1

[Muira McCammon]

Greetings!



See below for information about a special issue on dead and dying platforms
for *Internet Histories* that I am co-editing with Prof. Jessa Lingel.


We're seeking abstracts (500 words maximum) by September 1, 2020. We
especially welcome writing that explores platforms whose histories are
rooted in understudied countries, areas, cultures, and digital communities.
We particularly encourage submissions about platforms launched, used and/or
remembered outside of Silicon Valley.


Feel free to spread this call for papers (below) as widely as possible.  The
text is also available at the following URL:
https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/dead-and-dying-platforms/

Wishing you all health & equanimity,


Muira McCammon

A bit about my research here
<https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/Penn-grad-student-studies-information-flow-Guantanamo-Bay-Gitmo-detention-center>

Ph.D. candidate, Annenberg School for Communication, University of
Pennsylvania

M.L. candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School

Twitter: @muira_mccammon  <https://twitter.com/muira_mccammon>


**-*-*- // with the usual apologies for crossposting // *-*-*-*


*Dead and Dying Platforms: The Poetics, Politics, and Perils of Internet
History*



*Muira McCammon & Jessa Lingel (University of Pennsylvania)*



*Rationale & Motivation*



This special issue explores internet histories through the lens of
“platform death” as a way of understanding how digital communities grapple
with absence, invisibility, and disappearance. Collectively, the
contributions in this issue will address the cultural, geopolitical,
economic, and socio-legal repercussions of what happens when various
corners of the Internet fail, decline, or expire. As a point of departure,
we assume that platforms can bring together a wide set of actors, from
politicians to parents, teens to technologists, spies to free speech
activists; they can serve as a stage where people gather, argue, develop
personal relationships, and jockey for divergent futures (Marvin, 1988;
Pearce, 2011; Baym, 2015; Lee, 2017; Gillepsie, 2018). But what becomes of
platforms when they fade, fail, or fall from public favor? What can dead
and dying platforms tell us about the internet’s growth and stagnation, its
present and futures? We seek to complicate, document, and build on the
narratives of platform change, collapse, death, precarity, and frailty that
scholars (Gehl, 2012; Chun, 2016; Belleflamme & Neysen, 2017; Gomez-Meijia,
2018; Helmond & van der Vlist, 2019) and tech journalists (Kircher, 2016)
have highlighted over the past two decades.

Recent scholarship has focused on the rise and resilience of certain tech
enterprises, such as YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter (e.g. Burgess & Green,
2009; Vaidhyanathan, 2018; Jackson, Bailey, & Foucault Welles, 2020), but
much of this research has privileged big platforms over the small,
surviving digital communities over the dead, and Silicon
Valley-born-and-bred design thinking over that birthed outside tech hot
spots. Studies imagining the demise of Big Tech platforms (Ohman &
Aggarwal, 2019) and tracing consumer resistance to digital media (Katz &
Aspden, 1998; Portwood-Stacer, 2013) have largely ignored both the values
and frailties of Small Tech in great depth. While historical and
contemporary research has addressed the themes of digital departure (Wyatt,
1999; Baumer et al., 2013), disappearing mediums (Gehl, 2012; Suominen et
al., 2013; Ballatore & Natale, 2016), and user mortality (Leaver, 2013), it
has largely left the theme of “platform death” to the wayside. Another key
absence in this literature is attention to platforms and communities
outside the U.S. and Europe.

With the above gaps in the literature in mind, the impetus for this special
issue came from a forthcoming panel in the Communication History Division
at the May 2020 International Communication Association’s Annual
Conference, “Dead and Dying Platforms: The Poetics, Politics, and Perils of
Internet History.” When organizing the panel, over 20 different scholars in
six countries writing on the histories of specific, bounded platforms
expressed interest. Though not all could be included in the final panel,
many articulated a desire to contribute to a special issue, such as this
one, focusing on the promises and perils of single platforms through the
lens of Internet history. This special issue seeks to bring together
diverse thinkers and scholars with expertise in a range of dead and dying
platforms.



*Description of CFP Procedure*



We aim to bring together contributors active in the fields of history,
communication, media studies, law, economics, psychology, internet studies,
library and information science, queer theory, journalism studies, and
related scholarly domains. The topic of contributions may include, but are
not limited to:



   - The rise and fall of specific platforms, including discussions on the
   challenges, factors, and policies responsible for their decline – and
   rebirth.
   - Archival techniques and theoretical frameworks for resurrecting and
   reimagining dead platforms
   - Comparative investigations of platform precarity
   - Explorations of the laws, economic forces, and social trends that
   underlie the historical analysis of platforms that have survived to the
   present day
   - Memory narratives and counter-narratives of platform users, designers,
   and advertisers
   - Media refusal, disconnection and techno-skepticism
   - The offline repercussions and cultural reverberations of platform death
   - Rhetorics and metaphors of the describe platform death and failures of
   platform governance (i.e. kill switches)
   - The ethnographies, pre-histories, and afterlives of dying digital
   communities
   - Quantitative and qualitative methodologies that can operationalize
   platform collapse
   - Interconnections between the frailties of Small Tech and the failures
   of Big Tech
   - Ways in which the rise and fall of certain platforms are
   geographically asymmetrical and asynchronous
   - Media change, materiality, everyday experience, and nostalgia
   - The ontological and epistemological challenges of considering
   platforms as dead, dying, or alive
   - Historiographies of platforms created, used, and/or dismantled outside
   the United States
   - Studies of platforms whose deaths have not received significant
   Anglophone press coverage
   - Analysis of the implications of platform death for international and
   global discussions of Internet pasts and futures



Although papers do need to be written in English, we especially welcome
writing that explores platforms whose histories are rooted in understudied
countries, areas, cultures, and digital communities. We particularly
encourage submissions about platforms launched, used and/or remembered
outside of Silicon Valley.



*Submissions & Time Schedule*


Abstracts (500 words maximum) should be emailed to deadplatforms at gmail.com by
September 1, 2020. Any questions about the CFP can be sent to the
co-editors, Muira McCammon (muira.mccammon at asc.upenn.edu) and Jessa Lingel (
jessa.lingel at asc.upenn.edu).  Notification about acceptance to submit an
article will be sent out by 1 October 2020.  Authors of accepted abstracts
are invited to submit an article by 1 February 2021. Final versions or
articles are asked to keep within a 6,000 word limit. Please note that
acceptance of abstract does not ensure final publication as all articles
must go through the journal’s usual peer review process.



— 1 Sep 2020: due date for abstracts

— 1 Oct 2020: notification of acceptance

— 1 Feb 2021: accepted articles to be submitted for review

— Feb 2021-May 2021: review process and revisions