[Air-L] Algorithms, autonomy and news choice overload

[Sacha Molitorisz]

Dear AoIR colleagues,

With a shameless lack of humility, I draw your attention to a new open access article published this week in Policy and Internet: 'A legal cure for news choice overload: Regulating algorithms and AI with ‘light patterns’ to foster autonomy and democracy'.

The link is here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/poi3.412

And the abstract goes a little something like this:
Despite an unprecedented abundance of news content, both news avoidance and dissatisfaction are rising. Blending journalism, philosophy and law scholarship, this paper argues that ‘news choice overload’ causes paralysis and poor outcomes as it transfers power to algorithms, thereby harming autonomy and, in turn, democracy. An analysis of Australian and European regulatory responses shows the need for an algorithmic regulator and a transparency requirement for digital platforms. Further, people's ability to choose autonomously can be fostered by positive interventions, or ‘light patterns’, including ‘diversity nudges’ and a shift from caveat emptor to a caveat venditor approach, in which digital platforms are assigned legal responsibility. Recognising that it is autonomy and democracy—not choice per se—that are valuable, such interventions can shift meaningful decision-making back to citizens at a moment when the rise of generative artificial intelligence is giving algorithms yet more power.
Wishing you all a safe, happy weekend,
Sacha

Dr Sacha Molitorisz (he/him)

Senior Lecturer in Law

Centre for Media Transition<http://cmt.uts.edu.au>, UTS


Latest book: Net Privacy<https://www.newsouthbooks.com.au/books/net-privacy/>

Research: Click here<https://scholar.google.com.au/citations?user=Yp9h-zEAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao>


We at UTS Faculty of Law pay our respects to the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters upon which we live and work, and to their Elders past and present. We acknowledge them as the Traditional Custodians of Country and Knowledge for these places. We recognise the strengths of Indigenous Australians and we seek to work with Indigenous communities to ensure that the Anglo-Australian legal system advances Indigenous self-determination.

UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the University of Technology Sydney. Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects. Think. Green. Do. Please consider the environment before printing this email.