[Assam] From Tehelka
Chan Mahanta
cmahanta at charter.net
Thu Aug 17 07:21:45 PDT 2006
You have completely gone off the reservation here Ram :-).
I was asking you about China, because you don't seem to think China's
Marxist government was good for its people.
c-da
PS: Indentured peasants are all over North , Central and Western
India. Perhaps even the South. There are a lot of things that are NOT
sanctioned by GoI. But they happen never-the-less. So one might be
led to ask, WHO needs such a govt., if it cannot protect its most
vulnerable people?
Heard of Naxals Ram?
At 8:45 AM -0500 8/17/06, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>C'da,
>
> >*** Is it a minus Ram? How would you describe it, had your parents
>been landless, indentured peasants, without a >shelter to call it
>home and if the STATE came to your aid by ensuring you had food,
>shelter and health care?
>
>Yes, it would. But is that the situation in Assam? And if so, how
>many people are affected? Are affected numbers far greater than any
>other state?
>
>Indentured peasants if they exist in India, are NOT state sanctioned.
>
>Lastly, is your suggestion for solving India's (or Assam's) poverty
>ridden plight a communistic approach?
>
>--Ram
>
>
>
>
>
>On 8/16/06, Chan Mahanta
><<mailto:cmahanta at charter.net>cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
>
> >I did know Israel was Communistic in governance. I would,
>however, >differentiate between socialism and communism. Countries
>in Scandinavia are >socialistic to a degree - doesn't make them
>communistic.
>
>
>
>
>*** I am glad you have the ability to split hairs Ram :-).
>
>
>I am however quite curious about the fine distinctions between
>living in a Kibbutz, in a communal arrangement, and the
>unacceptability of 'communistic'. Can you help ?
>
>
> >And that is a plus point for China?
>
>
>*** Is it a minus Ram? How would you describe it, had your parents
>been landless, indentured peasants, without a shelter to call it
>home and if the STATE came to your aid by ensuring you had food,
>shelter and health care? I am sure a lot of peple woud like to hear
>:-).
>
>
>
>
>c-da
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 6:20 PM -0500 8/16/06, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>
>>C'da
>>
>
>
> >A nation way worse off than India 50 years back, now has no one
>going hungry or >homeless or without health care, leaving Indian
>nationalists green with envy, isn't it?
>
>
>
>And that is a plus point for China? Lack of individual freedoms in
>China (and Cuba) are mandated by the state. Will that be sufficient
>for Assam - if the GOI were to provide homes, food and healthcare
>only?
>
>
>
> >*** Considering your lumping all these three together to mean that
>they are all the same?
>
>
>
>All I was saying is that Hitler like Castro and Marx did have a huge
>influence, a negative one, but none the less an influence.
>
>
>
> >*** What does that mean Ram? That them being democratic absolves
>them of their >socialist/communistic sins?
>
>
>
>
> >Democracy is a TOOL Ram, it is NOT and end unto itself.
>
>
>
>I did know Israel was Communistic in governance. I would, however,
>differentiate between socialism and communism. Countries in
>Scandinavia are socialistic to a degree - doesn't make them
>communistic.
>
>
>
>--Ram
>
>
>
>
>
>On 8/16/06, Chan Mahanta
><<mailto:cmahanta at charter.net>cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
>
>Ram:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >C'da, wanting and fighting for freedom is a noble thing. The way
>some try to >get it is often ignoble - and that is the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>*** I would not dare hold a candle to your goodness Ram :-).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Marx and Castro obviously did have a huge influence on human
>civilization. So >did Hitler.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>*** Considering your lumping all these three together to mean that
>they are all the same? Is your desi-hyperbole working overtime Ram
>:-)?
>
>
>
>
>Also, even though Marxism might not be your cup of tea or mine, can
>you go tell that to Chinese? A nation way worse off than India 50
>years back, now has no one going hungry or homeless or without
>health care, leaving Indian nationalists green with envy, isn't it?
>
>
>
>
>Similarly for Castro. He may not be your hero, but Cubans seem to
>think differently, don't they? Unless of course you know what is
>best for Cubans :-).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >This much I know, it is a democracy with kibbutzes and all.
>
>
>
>
>*** What does that mean Ram? That them being democratic absolves
>them of their socialist/communistic sins?
>
>
>
>
>Democracy is a TOOL Ram, it is NOT and end unto itself.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>c-da
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 3:00 PM -0500 8/16/06, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>
>>Ouch! C'da,
>>
>
>
> >But regardless of their political creed NO revolutionary could
>deny >Castro his due place in the history of revolutions.
>Similarly, >regardless of the failures ( or successes) of Marxism as
>a system >of governance, no one can deny the enormous influence Marx
>left >in the formation of contemporary human civilization
>
>
>
>Good questions requiring deep thoughts. Marx and Castro obviously
>did have a huge influence on human civilization. So did Hitler.
>IMHO, we judge such personalities NOT by the amount of influence
>they had on civilizations, but by how much good they have done for
>humanity either thru their teachings or they way they ruled (Cuba).
>
>Both Marx and Castro have been absolute failures in that regard.
>Though Marz never raised a gun, he did manage to incite a number of
>countries (China, Indo-China comes to mind) who used/misused his
>doctrines to enslave huge populations for decades. That hopefully is
>not what those fighting for freedom in Assam want for the people of
>Assam.
>
>
>
>
> >There is way too much hypocrisy and self-serving piety going on
>all >around us today to give such labels any credence at all Ram.
>
>
>
>I agree, but there is a whale lot of difference between people who
>might swear by a Gandhi and those by a Hitler or a Castro.
>
>
>
>Don't know much about the form of Govt. Israel has. This much I
>know, it is a democracy with kibbutzes and all. But about Begin
>turning 'freedom fighter', thats a pretty common these days of
>global politics. The same with Arafat, once a terrorist, then goes
>on to win the Nobel.
>
>
>
>C'da, wanting and fighting for freedom is a noble thing. The way
>some try to get it is often ignoble - and that is the problem.
>
>
>
>--Ram
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 8/16/06, Chan Mahanta
><<mailto:cmahanta at charter.net>cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
>
>I don't know Pradip Gogoi from Adam, Ram, even though he is a fellow
>Jokaisukiya from perhaps thirty miles or so from where I grew up. I
>don't know under what context he said what he did. But regardless of
>their political creed NO revolutionary could deny Castro his due
>place in the history of revolutions. Similarly, regardless of the
>failures ( or successes) of Marxism as a system of governance, no
>one can deny the enormous influence Marx left in the formation of
>contemporary human civilization.
>
>
>
>
> >will there be a Communistic slant in their rule?
>
>
>
>
>*** Even if I were to be in a position to answer such questions, I
>could not have answered such a vague question. What exactly is a
>communistic slant? Is Israel with its Kibbutzes ( Communes) and
>absence of private land-ownership and socialist governance
>'communistic'; fit to be tarred and feathered with such simplistic
>labels ? How did Menachem Begin get rehabilitated as a
>'freedom-fighter', while he was instrumental to blowing up
>Britishers and their installations and was once branded by them a
>'terrorist'? What kind of cleansing solvent did Begin's followers
>find to wash off his 'terrorist' label?
>
>
>
>
>There is way too much hypocrisy and self-serving piety going on all
>around us today to give such labels any credence at all Ram.
>Particularly by people who are informed and are able to reason.
>
>
>
>
>c-da
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 12:31 PM -0500 8/16/06, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>
>>C'da
>>
>
>
>Thanks for sharing that with us. Pretty interesting. Gogoi does have
>the tenacity and passion - one must give him that, even though I
>necessarily do not see things his way.
>
>
>
>Its is intriguing that his passion for independence is built upon
>the ideals of Marx and Castro.
>
>
>
>The question is, if people like him become leaders of an independent
>Assam, will there be a Communistic slant in their rule?
>
>
>
>Just thoughts.
>
>
>
>--Ram
>
>
>On 8/16/06, Chan Mahanta
><<mailto:cmahanta at charter.net>cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
>
>ULFA's Pradip Gogoi in Tehelka:
>
><http://www.fromallangles.com/newspapers/country/india/tehelka.com.htm>http://www.fromallangles.com/newspapers/country/india/tehelka.com.htm
>
>_______________________________________________
>assam mailing list
><mailto:assam at assamnet.org>assam at assamnet.org
><http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>
>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.assamnet.org/pipermail/assam-assamnet.org/attachments/20060817/4fddb1ad/attachment.htm>
More information about the Assam
mailing list