[Assam] beef-eating in india -myth of Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses etc

[Barua25]

>Why do you think Ram or Krishna have to take up a matter against some religion which sprang up thousands of >years after they died.

According to Gita, Hindusim or Sanatana Dharma did not start thousands of years after Krishna's death. Rather Krishna explained to Arjuana what the religion is. Krishna may be said to be the originator. So he should protect the religion if he is real God. 
RB  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: umesh sharma 
  To: Rajen Barua ; xourov at yahoo.com ; assamrs at gmail.com 
  Cc: assam at assamnet.org 
  Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 3:44 PM
  Subject: Re: [Assam] beef-eating in india -myth of Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses etc


  Rajen-da,

  God has always helped me -is helping me.

  But your remarks tell us what you think about God's existence, religions  etc. 

  Why do you think Ram or Krishna have to take up a matter against some religion which sprang up thousands of years after they died? Do you expect Hitler to come back to life to defend Nazi principles now  or Buddha or Mother Teresa to come back to life to prove they were genuine and did miracles attributed to them?


  :)

  Umesh

  Rajen Barua <barua25 at hotmail.com> wrote:
    Umesh:
    Frankly speaking, I doubt if God will help you.
    If Rama and Krishna were genuine incarnations of God, they would have, by  this time, established themselves firmly their positions against Western Christian critics. That they have not done that, shows that either there is no God or they were fake incarnations, and guys like you are trying their best to believe something which is not true.
    What do you say? Do you think God is partial to Christianity?
    RB


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      From: umesh sharma <jaipurschool at yahoo.com>
      Reply-To: umesh.sh05 at post.harvard.edu
      To: Rajen & Ajanta Barua <barua25 at hotmail.com>, xourov pathok <xourov at yahoo.com>, Ram Sarangapani <assamrs at gmail.com>
      CC: assam at assamnet.org
      Subject: Re: [Assam] beef-eating in india -myth of Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses etc
      Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:12:16 +0100 (BST)


      well I agree to that.

      I need God's help again.

      after eating Chinese dish -which did not mention what was in it (i avoided seafood -since my last attack in Jan-for same reasons perhaps -though my students had eye flu too) I look Chinese too - eyes are mere slits. The rashes have gone but breathing is still heavy .

      Umesh

      Rajen & Ajanta Barua <barua25 at hotmail.com> wrote:
        This means the Hindus will haqve to do some homework to establish 
        historicity of Rama and Krsuhna. This does not mean they are all myth, but 
        they have to prove otherwise.
        Compare these to Jesus.
        RB

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: "xourov pathok" 
        To: ; "Ram Sarangapani" 
        Cc: 
        Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 7:47 PM
        Subject: Re: [Assam] beef-eating in india -myth of Jesus, Muhhamad, Moses 
        etc


        >
        >
        > --- umesh sharma wrote:
        >
        >> Any comments about Mythical nature of Jesus, Moses
        >> or Muhammad?
        >> There is NO historical proof that any of the above
        >> did any miraculous work to render them divine --like
        >> resurrection of Christ, parting the waves crossing
        >> the Red sea by Moses etc --yet despite the stories
        >> circulating around them which defy human logic -they
        >> are believed to have existed.
        >
        > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
        >
        >
        >> Why not about Ram or Krishna ( recently they have
        >> even found an underwater city -adjacent Dwarka-
        >> established by Krishna -as mentioned in Mahabharat
        >> and other Hindu texts) -despite some
        >> miraculous/illogical events?
        >
        > rama and krishna are given as much historicity as
        > possible, according to the evidence. the underwater
        > city they claim as dwarka is not confirmed. the
        > problem is let alone dwarka, even hastinapur,
        > indraprastha etc have not been properly identified.
        > even though they have found settlements, they do not
        > correspond to cities, let alone grand cities as
        > depicted in the epics. this does not negate the
        > possibility of a historical indraprastha, of course.
        > it simply means we have not found it yet.
        >
        >
        >
        >


      Umesh Sharma
      5121 Lackawanna ST
      College Park, MD 20740

      1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]

      Ed.M. - International Education Policy
      Harvard Graduate School of Education,
      Harvard University,
      Class of 2005

      weblog: http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/ 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Now you can have your favourite RSS headlines come to you with the all new Yahoo! Mail. 

    _______________________________________________
    assam mailing list
    assam at assamnet.org
    http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org




  Umesh Sharma
  5121 Lackawanna ST
  College Park, MD 20740

  1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]

  Ed.M. - International Education Policy
  Harvard Graduate School of Education,
  Harvard University,
  Class of 2005

  weblog: http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy and free. Do it now...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.assamnet.org/pipermail/assam-assamnet.org/attachments/20060619/d7c10972/attachment.htm>