[Assam] Indian reality versus Western mythology- Pan-Hindu beliefs list

umesh sharma jaipurschool at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 10 21:57:17 PDT 2007


Rajen-da,

You try to put me in a spot but I think the answer is not tht elusive-lets see:

1. ALL Hindus believe in God
2. All Hindus believe in reincarnation - rebirth
 3. All Hindus believe that it is possible to attain Moksha/Nirvana through meditation/Yoga , prayer etc -- that is meet God in one own's lifetime..
Let me add some more points - which actually are more central to my comments
4. All Hindus that caste system has been part of Hindu society for long - that means they believe in some system which has a religious head (Brahmin)-who has a job to assist others in their prayers --so that means that person should have some qualification. That qualification should be common to ALL jobs who hold that job across India/Hindu society
5. ALL Hindus believe that there was a city called Indraprastha (current Indian capital Delhi) and that Mahabharat war was fought near it -at Kurukshetra - and its participants were then real persons.

If one does not believe in the above (atleast the first three) that person cannot be 
called a Hindu. In social science -exceptions do not change the rule - it is a mater of a significant number of the group acting or believing in a certain way. So even if 5% of the Hindus (read  the so-called  westernised educated ones)  do not  believe   in any of the above - their views can be disregarded.

Umesh



Rajen & Ajanta Barua <barua25 at hotmail.com> wrote:       >The only logic  many vested interests do not want to acknowledge  that Indians could have (or have had) a collective vision - a harmonious culture  sharing common beliefs, holidays and celebrations.
  
 I don't want to argue or comment on  anybody's belief. But don't you think the above is correct ie Hindus (forget  Indians) don't have a collective vision? Is not that the problem with present  India? The Hindus (forget the Indians) donot have a common harmonius culture  sharing common beliefs, holidays and celebrations.  If you don't want to  acknowledge that, then please cite at least just (3) THREE things which in your  opinion ALL Hindus believe. I think you would have a hard time to answer  that and find even this small section of netters to agree with your  view. In fact for the last two hundred years that is what all scholars,  Indian and non Indian, (including Vivekananda, Tegore, Ram Mohon Roy,  Ramakrishna, Aurobindo, Gandhi, Radhakrishnan and others) have been trying to  answer that question without much success. So before we blame the West, let us  at least try to understand where we are. Let us hear from you.
  
 Rajen da
  
    ----- Original Message ----- 
   From:    umesh    sharma 
   To: Ram Sarangapani ; barua25 
   Cc: assam at assamnet.org 
   Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 4:27    PM
   Subject: Re: [Assam] Indian reality    versus Western mythology
   

Ram-da and Rajen-da,

The point is not whether Jesus or    Krishna or Rajen or  Umesh or Ram existed - it is that they are believed    to be so - just liked USA is believed to be the only Super Power in the world.    Someone in remote India may have NO inkling what is Roman empire or that any    such country ever existed -- but  that person should or would bow down to    the fact that  so many  educated Indians believe  it    does.   Why cannot  someone in the West understand that most    Indians (read Hindus 800 million of them) believe Krishna and Ram lived on    earth - just Westerners (even athiests ) believe that Abraham lived on earth    to the age of 800 years (as per Bible) and that Jesus was born of Virgin    Mary.

Belief of a group can be put on wikipedia etc - why do westerners    oppose even that ? Why belittle it as some minor literary text characters aka    Ian Fleming's  (I refer to Ram or Krishna here)  -- which has no    consequence to spiritual or religious beliefs of Hindus. 
The only    logic  many vested interests do not want to acknowledge that Indians    cuold have (or have had) a collective vision - a harmonious culture sharing    common beliefs, holidays and celebrations. Isn't it much easier to paint a    picture where every Indian was following his or her own thing --someone    worshipping in the east another in the west. One day one person celebrating ,    next day another celebrating something --so the whole city or region never saw    eye to eye ----so NO culture!!
I was surprised to learn that Krishna is the    most revered person in way down India's south  Guruvayoor  temple    --same as in Manipur (far east ) just as in far west  at Dwarka and up    above in  Badrinath, Gangotri etc.   But some westerners would    assert that Hindus are a bunch of individualists - who believe different    things - have no religion except caste system (the only unifying social     force or common thought).

SCIENCE:

So when a nation/civilization    has no common social system except caste system (as per above logic) then how    can it have intellectuals sitting together to do scientific work and promoting    and rejecting hypothesis and building consensus. 
Umesh

Ram    Sarangapani <assamrs at gmail.com> wrote:        Barua,
      
     Just couldn't resist not butting in.
      
     Without going into the existence of Krishna, Shiva or Jesus :)here is a      site about Ancient Math in India. Also let us not forget Aryabhatta      (Math) and Kautilya(Politics & Governance).
      
     http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Indexes/Indians.html
 
     (BTW: the site is from a UK University and NOT something conjured up in      India:)
      
     --Ram
 
     On 8/10/07, barua25 <barua25 at hotmail.com> wrote:                    When I say FACTS AND FIGURES, I was talking not        about our religious heroes, but about Science and  Mathametics.
       Say for instance, what India did in case of        Mathematics and when?
       Can you produce any written evidence that India        invented the Zero and when? It is difficult. 
        
       I donot like to deal with mythical figures like        Shiva, Krishna etc. I consider these        Indian gods to be purely mythical figures transformed from some original        tribal religious cults. In my opinion, Shiva was orginally a local god in        the Harappa civilization and Krishna was a Dravidian local tribal god.        This much history tells. Do you have any other evidence to counter that ,        not who believes what? 
       Rajen da
        
                -----          Original Message ----- 
         From:          umesh sharma          
                  To:          Rajen & Ajanta          Barua ; umesh.sh05 at post.harvard.edu ; assam at assamnet.org          
         Sent:          Friday, August 10, 2007 1:33 PM
         Subject:          Re: [Assam] Indian reality versus Western mythology
         
 
Rajen-da,

Good to get your response. Now          about facts - would you not agree that most Hindus hail Krishna as one          of the Hindu heroes and believe that he lived in India thousands of          years back --- I wanted to put that on Wikipedia page of Krishna - and          they asked for facts --  what do you expect me to do? I believe          wiki is a good example of people over the globe trying to have          "sameness" - even here there is bias. 

Second, on Jesus's wiki          page I added a comment that many Indians believe that Jesus came to          learn his skills in India (and I added a BBC report on that with          weblink) and that was deleted - saying this is no research evidence --          for Indian news on Indian  culture even an obscure reference (with          no weblink) in any newspaer article in remote India is considered okay          by its editors -- incidently for Jesus they have stopped anyone from          editing the page. Anyone is free to write anything about Krshna , Ram          etc -- thats free for all. 

whats that to do with facts? Thats          plain bias.

Umesh

Rajen & Ajanta Barua <barua25 at hotmail.com          > wrote:                     Umesh:
           What you are saying is            right.
           The West has a            Eurocentric view of the world. They claim that the basic foundation of            the Western Civilization, especially on science, is mainly            based on Greek civilization. They even donot like to give proper            credit to the Indian and Chinese contribution in mathetics and other            science. I would say, the West is still in the Dark Age. However, they            have a point. Indians basically donot have any record of what they            did. If you want to counter the present Eurocentric view, the best            (and only way) is to debate will SOLID facts and figures and not            with rhetoric. 
           If you have any specific            issue, I would be glad to discus.
           Rajenda   
                        -----              Original Message ----- 
             From:              umesh sharma              
             To:              assam at assamnet.org 
             Sent:              Saturday, August 04, 2007 7:04 PM
             Subject:              [Assam] Indian reality versus Western mythology
             
 
Some days back a student of Indian origin born              and raised in US was surprised to learn that India had a glorious              history - he hardly believed me though.

  And it did not              surprise me since I have come to realize that every civilization              wants to promote itself as the best - Greek and Roman civilization              are promoted as ideals (closely followed by Egyptian one) -- Indian              and Chinese ones are lesser ones. 

Greek Toga costume parties              are common features of Western univs just like Indian kurta, dhoti              are picking up in Indian college fashion shows.


However,              the problem is that Western historians/scholars of non Western              spheres call themselves (and each other) as the world's              foremost/only reliable experts on their chosen area of expertise -              namely hows and whys of other civilization. Most believe (I believe)              that those in non-western world/developing world are too              naive/unscientific/non-modern/non-rational to understand and              appreciate the distinction between good and bad; and right and              wrong. 

I believe a lay westerner is more tolerant of others'              views than these experts (whose reputation and even careers depend              on promoting what they have always held as true).

I just              created a wikipedia page called Hindu Reality -speaking against this              tendency (I'm sure someone will come along and remove my arguments).              

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_reality  -              I just checked --someone has deleted the page itself. 

Wiki              seems to be about might is right - 

Any              comments?

Umesh






Umesh              Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328              [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy 
Harvard              Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of              2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu              info)

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/              (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are              used )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/              
             
---------------------------------
             Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less,              sign up for your free account today.              
             
---------------------------------
              
_______________________________________________
assam              mailing list
assam at assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



Umesh          Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M.          - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of          Education, 
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)          

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/          (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used          )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/          
         
---------------------------------
         Too much spam? Try Yahoo! Mail and we'll help keep the junk out of          your inbox.          
         



_______________________________________________
assam        mailing list
assam at assamnet.org 
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org






Umesh    Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. -    International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of    Education,
Harvard University,
Class of    2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu    info)

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management    Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used    )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/      

---------------------------------
   Inbox cluttered with junk? Clean up with Yahoo!    Mail.


Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep  (where the above 2 are used )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/
       
---------------------------------
Nervous about who has your email address?  Yahoo! Mail can help you win the war against spam.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.assamnet.org/pipermail/assam-assamnet.org/attachments/20070810/7f0b6f4d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Assam mailing list