[Assam] AN APPEAL TO THE PEOPLE OF ASSAM

Ram Sarangapani assamrs at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 21:27:26 PDT 2007


C'da,

I think I will respond to this post. It kinda explains what exactly you
meant. Moreover, I am having a difficulty in keeping track of who said what,
and all the cut & paste:)

So here goes,
>I will stop at this post.
I agree, we seem to be rehashing everything:)

>Assam journalists have been crying endlessly about  a number of
>issues, like ULFA, B'deshis, corruption and the like.

Well, that is obviously what they seem to be interested in.

>However they have utterly failed in their journalistic duties in
investigating, >analyzing and educating the public about the causes of these
problems
Who sets these standards of journalism? If they followed your advice and
found the GOI/GOA  the main reason for all the violence, would that make it
better?
>Nor have they offered any achievable and sustainable
>solutions to what they cry about, that I am aware of.

Actually, I have read numerous times the Sentinel/AT calling for peace talks
etc. Now, whether they are deemed achievable or sustainable is really in the
eye of the beholder.
I really don't see anybody being able to convince anyone. Basically, no one
sees eye to eye.

>Nor does symbolic flag-waving, appeals to the people and so forth. All that
does is >promote or publicize their own piety, something that does not in
any way help
>Assam in its woes.

True, but who has been doing this?  I can guess, but then, I would have to
come up with proof - which I can't pin down at the moment:)
--Ram

__________________


On 8/14/07, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
>
> Just so this discussion does not relapse into the same old repetition
> of  your or my positions, I will stop at this post.
>
> The point is not about MY views or Thakuria's or DN Bezbaruah's.
> Assam journalists have been crying endlessly about  a number of
> issues, like ULFA, B'deshis, corruption and the like. However they
> have utterly failed in their journalistic duties in investigating,
> analyzing and educating the public about the causes of these problems
> or how they can be resolved and how the people can become a part of
> the solution . Nor have they offered any achievable and sustainable
> solutions to what they cry about, that I am aware of.  Wishful
> thinking, or calling names, or sermonizing and lecturing those they
> disagree with do not qualify as such. Nor does symbolic flag-waving,
> appeals to the people and so forth. All that does is promote or
> publicize their own piety, something that does not in any way help
> Assam in its woes. As responsible and effective journalists, a key
> element of a functioning democracy ( unlike desi-demokrasy that is),
> they owe it to  their readers, to seek out those who have the ability
> to offer such achievable solutions and air them, if they cannot offer
> them themselves.  The least they can do.
>
> That in essence was what I wrote to Thakuria. If you believe that was
> a bad or destructive set of suggestions, you ought to point out that
> , explaining why.  Or if you have better ideas you ought to present
> those. That will be meaningful. But to go on as you have, with absurd
> demands and assertions
>
> >like   "---During last couple of elections Assam has witnessed at
> >least 65% or more vote casting.  This essentially
> >means that at least 65% of Assam's people believe in
> Indian Constitution.  What other verdict you want ??
>
> merely underscores your clueless disposition. And if you are
> wondering why it is clueless, try reconciling that with yours and
> Assam journalists' laments about the B'deshi immigration issue and
> why the voters don't care about it as proven by their election and
> re-election  of those who would not even acknowledge it as a problem,
> much less do anything about it.  And when you do, enlighten us about
> it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 1:04 PM -0700 8/14/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
> >--- Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
> >
> >>  >  >I understand.  However it looks more like ULFA
> >>  is in
> >>  >armed conflict against people of Assam rather then
> >>  India.
> >>
> >>
> >>  *** That is because you consider those who do not
> >>  subscribe to ULFA's
> >>  views are the true representatives of Assam. That
> >>  maybe so. But why
> >>  don't  those who sport that halo, hold a referendum
> >>  and decide, once
> >>  and for all, who the true reps. of Assam are? ULFA
> >>  has publicly
> >>  agreed to accept the verdict of the people.
> >
> >During last couple of elections Assam has witnessed at
> >least 65% or more vote casting.  This essentially
> >means that at least 65% of Assam's people believe in
> >Indian Constitution.  What other verdict you want ??
> >
> >
> >>
> >>  That would be a way to bring the conflict to an end.
> >>
> >>
> >>  >And BTW,  if you are guarding ULFA on pretext of
> >>  war, why not apply
> >>  >the same yardstick when it >comes to GOI???
> >>
> >>  *** I don't have any obligations to GoI. My
> >>  obligations are to the
> >>  people of Assam, their rights and their well-being.
> >
> >Hmmm....  and what well being do you see in kiiling
> >the children of Dhemaji or school teacher or numerous
> >other Assamese (I am excluding Biharis here)  who have
> >been killed.  What well being do you see in dictating
> >people Not to host Indian Flag.
> >
> >
> >>  I also do not
> >>  come from the ranks of those the who laughably sport
> >>  the halo of
> >>  being  'fair and-blanced' :-).
> >>
> >
> >We never thought you to be "fair and balanced"  :)
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>  >Whether they will publish this debate or not is
> >>  something which they
> >>  >can answer.
> >>
> >>  *** I did not ask you to speak for them. Just your
> >  > opinion of whether
> >>  they should is what I was hoping to hear.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  >  So is it that only those journalists who favor
> >>  your view are true journalist?
> >>
> >>  *** Is that something I said or implied? Or is that
> >>  'damned English
> >>  language' problem again :-)?
> >
> >Then why come down so heavily on Nava Thakuria, DN
> >Bezbarua et al.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>  >  >Even if the Assam Press initiates a debate do
> >  > you guarantee that
> >>  >your cohorts will not threaten those
> >>  >who debates for Assam being a part of India ?
> >>
> >>
> >>  *** If your cohorts do, or you do, I will surely
> >>  attempt to get the
> >>  approval of mine. But ULFA has publicly said, many
> >>  times, that they
> >>  would accept the verdict of a referendum. The need
> >>  for a debate prior
> >>  to such a referendum is implicit.
> >
> >Well,  you should definitely try to get approval of
> >your "cohorts"  who threatened a couple of journalists
> >just a few weeks back ......
> >
> >I do not think my "cohorts"  ever threatened any one.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>  >send a letter to your local newspaper explaining
> >>  Why St Louis should
> >>  >be Free from USA  and that you >will support a war
> >>  against USA if it
> >>  >is not freed.....
> >>
> >>  *** That would be a very dumb thing to do, and the
> >>  analogy could not
> >>  be more absurd.  St. Louis is not demanding to be
> >>  free of the USA,
> >
> >Assam is not demanding to be free of India... it is CM
> >and ULFA who is demanding it.
> >On a similar analogy, CM can surely demand St Louis to
> >be free from US .
> >
> >>  much less  waging a quarter century old insurgency.
> >>  But if it does
> >>  been, I will certainly  comply with your request.
> >>
> >
> >All insurgency start at some point by some people. So
> >you can surely start one (or attempt to start one) now
> >and see how your funtional democracy and press reacts.
> >   This will also give us an opportunity to learn how
> >GOI should have tackled ULFA when it first started
> >this insurgency.
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>  >Actually ..... not a single case of success  ....
> >>  not much of
> >>  >accomplishment :)
> >>
> >>  *** You sure know how to hurt a guy.
> >
> >Taking it as a complement :)
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>  >Same on the other side is true ... particulrly when
> >>  you try avoiding
> >>  >difficult question
> >>
> >>  *** I  think you are toiling under an Oxomiya bhaxa
> >>  problem too :-).
> >>  Avoiding difficult questions, evasiveness,  is not
> >>  analogous to
> >>  refusing to admit what stares one in the face.
> >>
> >
> >Uh .... I do not have any Oxomiya Bhaxa problem.  Why
> >I equated it is because by avoiding such unpleasant
> >questions you do just the same --- "refuse to admit
> >what stares one in the face"
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  At 11:46 AM -0700 8/14/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
> >>  wrote:
> >>  >  > *** ULFA is in an armed conflict with India. It
> >>  is a
> >>  >>  war . In wars
> >>  >>  such fundamental rights as speech or freedom of
> >>  >>  expression  are some
> >>  >>  of the most early and consistent victims, across
> >>  the
> >>  >>  world.
> >>  >
> >>  >I understand.  However it looks more like ULFA is
> >>  in
> >>  >armed conflict against people of Assam rather then
> >>  >India.
> >>  >
> >>  >And BTW,  if you are guarding ULFA on pretext of
> >>  war,
> >>  >why not apply the same yardstick when it comes to
> >>  >GOI???
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >*** Now can you tell us why the press in Assam
> >>  would
> >>  >>  not allow an
> >>  >>  informed, unfettered
> >>  >>  discussion/debate  about why  Assam ought to be
> >>  free
> >>  >>  or NOT ? Would
> >>  >>  they publish the debate we had in this forum?
> >>  >
> >>  >Whether they will publish this debate or not is
> >>  >something which they can answer.  However,  a
> >>  couple
> >>  >of years back a similar debate from AssamNet was
> >>  >published in Assam Tribune, if I remember correct.
> >>  >
> >>  >Have you tried sending an article /letter to Assam
> >>  >Press?
> >>  >There have been many instances when you have cited
> >>  >articles from Assam/Indian press in support of your
> >>  >view.  So is it that only those journalists who
> >>  favor
> >>  >your view are true journalist?
> >>  >Even if the Assam Press initiates a debate do you
> >>  >guarantee that your cohorts will not threaten those
> >>  >who debates for Assam being a part of India ?
> >>  >
> >>  >Now let us turn to your ideal and functioning
> >>  democary
> >>  >..... Try this ....
> >>  >send a letter to your local newspaper explaining
> >>  Why
> >  > >St Louis should be Free from USA  and that you will
> >>  >support a war against USA if it is not freed.....
> >>  if
> >>  >you need to find a reason I can help you ....  let
> >>  us
> >>  >see how your functioning democracy and its press
> >>  >treats you.
> >>  >
> >>  >>  *** Helping educate people like yourselves,
> >>  although
> >>  >>  not always
> >>  >>  successfully .
> >>  >
> >>  >Actually ..... not a single case of success  ....
> >  > not
> >>  >much of accomplishment :)
> >>  >
> >>  >In this context, the 'nwdhown gaa
> >>  >>  dhouaali, nakhawn
> >>  >>  bhaat khuali, nigilw ki koro kor' factor plays
> >>  out
> >>  >>  quite often :-).
> >>  >
> >>  >Same on the other side is true ... particulrly when
> >>  >you try avoiding difficult questions.
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >--- Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >Do you think that ULFA (or Anyone else) should
> >>  deny
> >>  >>  >anybodys right to host Indian Flag ?
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  *** ULFA is in an armed conflict with India. It
> >>  is a
> >>
> >=== message truncated ===
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >____________________________________________________________________________________
> >Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s
> >user panel and lay it on us.
> >http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.assamnet.org/pipermail/assam-assamnet.org/attachments/20070814/82e783e8/attachment.htm>


More information about the Assam mailing list