[Assam] Fwd: Re: Los Angeles Times on Northeast India

Manoj Das dasmk2k at gmail.com
Mon Jun 2 21:17:14 PDT 2008


C-da

Well, Govt. of India has been holding talks with Bangladeshi counterparts
through direct channel.. Bangladesh could never forgive India for the
Farakka barrage.

International diplomacy requires more than just dialog. India is not a good
brother in its neighborhood; disliked by everyone..we may blame conveniently
on foreign hand..:)

mkd

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:

> M:
>
>
>
> >  > Number one is Bangladesh, which is
> >constantly frustrating India's efforts to get transit through the male
> river
>
>
>
>
> *** What do we know about what INDIA has been doing to get B'deshi
> co-operation to get river access to Assam and the  region ?
>
> Has Indian govt. told us what it has been doing all these decades,
> and how B' or why B'desh has been FRUSTRATING it?
>
>
> As you can imagine, these efforts always involve give and take. Just
> demands and/or intimidation does not bring results. Have Indian
> officialdom ever brought the people into confidence and shared their
> negotiating stances and the B'deshi responses ?
>
> I am sure the people of Assam would want to know that. Wouldn't you?
>
> c-da
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 9:41 AM +0530 6/2/08, Manoj Das wrote:
> >I was thinking this all along!
> >
> >When I shared this news with a Japanese thinker from ADB, he was stunned..
> >There are many players in this. Number one is Bangladesh, which is
> >constantly frustrating India's efforts to get transit through the male
> >river. Secondly a grand politics of undermining Assam's destined position
> as
> >the land bridge between giant Asian land and economic masses.
> >
> >mkd
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Dilip&Dil Deka <dilipdeka at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>  Forwarding.
> >>
> >>  Dilip&Dil Deka <dilipdeka at yahoo.com> wrote:  Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008
> >>  20:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
> >>  From: Dilip&Dil Deka <dilipdeka at yahoo.com>
> >>  Subject: Re: [Assam] Los Angeles Times on Northeast India
> >>  To: baruah at bard.edu, cmahanta at charter.net
> >>
> >>   Dear Sanjib,
> >>   You said, "But are they  producing or is it only assembling products.
> I
> >>  don't know the answer. "
> >>   Even Assembling products is better than not doing anything. Mexico is
> >>  making a lot of money assembling products for USA. Assembling products
> >>  eventually leads to local production if the local entrepreneurs mean to
> take
> >>  part in the process.
> >>   Car battery industry is a good example. As I understand, back in
> seventies
> >>  batteries were assembled in Assam. I heard that most of the parts are
> now
> >>  made in Assam. Is it true?
> >>   Dilipda
> >>
> >>  baruah at bard.edu wrote:
> >>   Dear Dilipda and Mahanta,
> >>
> >>  Good hearing from you. I am skeptical, as Mahanta has noted. But not
> >>  because a lot new is not taking place -- but because things that are
> >>  crucial for a breakthrough are not happenning. There is a much more
> >>  affluent India, and many in Delhi are genuinely committed to doing
> >>  more. So if earlier we talked about 100 crores, now the language is of
> >>  1000 crores. But is money enough? Domestic policy and foreign policy
> >>  cannot be separated when it comes to Northeast India. Our relations
> >>  with China may be improving in many ways, but not when it comes to
> >>  Arunchal Pradesh. Only last summer China has begun referring to AP as
> >>  China's Southern Tibet. So long as the Burmese military regime is
> >>  there, huge amount of foreign funds are not going to move in to build
> >>  infrastructure in Burma. Indian money or Chinese money can do a little
> >>  bit of this and that, but not the funds that could be mobilized for
> >>  Northeast india to benefit from India's Look East policy. No matter
> >>  how much we shout about Bangladesh's animosity, the burden of normal
> >>  relations is on the bigger neighbour as in all such cases of a country
> >>  that is far more resourceful than the aggreived smaller neighbor. We
> >>  may be landocked by India, said a Bangladeshi foreign minister, but
> >>  Northeast india is landlocked by us. So the military man's vision of
> >>  the Look East policy -- linking up with the Burmese or the Bangaldeshi
> >>  army to get support for their anti-insurgency operations--is a very
> >>  poor substitute to the huge leap of resources -- material as well as
> >>  intellectual -- that is needed for the task. At the same time I am
> >>  willing to say that we do not know the implications of some of the
> >>  huge amount of money that is being spent. There are about 15 daily
> >>  flights from Delhi to Guwahati -- more than any other comparable city.
> >  > There is much more energetic road-building (and the massive
> >>  disappearance of trees and of the familiar surroundings around the
> >>  trunk road) etc etc. I know the planes carry many businessmen taking
> >>  advantage of the tax benefits of investing in the region. But are they
> >>  producing or is it only assembling products. I don't know the answer.
> >>  But we surely need a new language to talk about the region --
> >>  certainty "neglect" is not what is happenning any more.
> >>
> >>  Hope all is well.
> >>
> >>  With warm regards,
> >>
> >>  Sanjib
> >>
> >>
> >>  Quoting Chan Mahanta :
> >>
> >>  > Thanks for sharing the article Baruah.
> >>  >
> >>  > But I share your skepticism. We have heard these for decades on end
> >>  > now. The politicians attempt to take credit for imaginary
> >>  > achievements and establishment spokespersons paint rosy scenarios, in
> >>  > the air. But what has the reality been?
> >>  >
> >>  > m
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > At 8:33 PM -0400 5/30/08, baruah at bard.edu wrote:
> >>  >>
> http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-india29-2008may29,0,6712115.story
> >>  >>
> >>  >> From the Los Angeles Times
> >>  >> Northeast India is poised to tap economic potential
> >>  >> The eight-state area plans multiple projects to increase its trade
> >>  >> with Southeast Asia.
> >>  >> By Shankhadeep Choudhury
> >>  >> Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
> >>  >>
> >>  >> May 29, 2008
> >>  >>
> >>  >> NEW DELHI - India's remote northeast region has been both blessed
> and
> >>  >> cursed by its geography. The region is rich in natural resources but
> >>  >> is landlocked and surrounded by China, Myanmar, Bangladesh and
> Bhutan,
> >>  >> leaving it impoverished.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> The eight-state region may finally get a chance to start living up
> to
> >>  >> its economic potential with several projects to enhance connections
> >>  >> with Southeast Asia and to increase outlets for such commodities as
> >>  >> organic foods, orchids, tea, coal and oil.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Now, the only way to move major quantities of goods between
> northeast
> >>  >> India and Southeast Asia is through Bangladesh.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> But authorities in Myanmar and India are nearing final approval of a
> >>  >> $100-million river project giving northeast India direct access to
> the
> >>  >> Indian Ocean through Myanmar, said Abhijit Barooah, chairman of the
> >>  >> northeastern chapter of the Confederation of Indian Industry,
> India's
> >>  >> premier business association.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> The project envisages facilitating movement of cargo from India's
> >>  >> Mizoram state to Myanmar's port at Sittwe, via the Kaladan River.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> In addition, talks have begun between companies in northeast India
> and
> >>  >> Thailand after a trade-promotion conference in Bangkok in October,
> >>  >> said Lemli Loyi, assistant general manager at the state-run North
> >>  >> Eastern Development Finance Corp. Loyi expressed hope that the talks
> >>  >> would result in increased business and possible joint ventures.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> India first enunciated a "look east" policy, an economic and
> strategic
> >>  >> orientation toward Southeast Asia, in 1992. It had its genesis at
> the
> >>  >> end of the Cold War, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Having
> >>  >> lost the Soviet economic and political support on which it had
> relied,
> >>  >> the Indian government embarked on a program of free-market
> >>  >> restructuring at home and sought new markets and economic partners
> >>  >> abroad.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Officials envisaged that the eight northeast states -- Assam,
> >>  >> Meghalaya, Manipur, Nagaland, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Tripura and
> >>  >> Mizoram -- would emerge as a trading hub for two dynamic regions
> >>  >> connected by a network of highways, railways, pipelines and
> >>  >> transmission lines. The region is home to about 40 million people.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> But progress has been slow. The region's isolation dates to the
> 1800s.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> "Nineteenth-century British colonial decisions to draw lines between
> >>  >> the hills and the plains, to put barriers on trade between Bhutan
> and
> >>  >> Assam, and to treat Burma as a buffer against French Indochina and
> >>  >> China severed the region from its traditional trade routes -- the
> >>  >> southern trails of the Silk Road," said Sanjib Baruah, a professor
> of
> >>  >> political science at Bard College in New York and an expert on
> >  > >> northeast India.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> The British built railways and roads mostly to take tea, coal, oil
> and
> >>  >> other resources out of Assam and into the rest of India and also to
> >>  >> Europe.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> The problems increased with the partitioning of India and Pakistan
> in
> >>  >> 1947. Bangladesh broke away from Pakistan in the 1970s.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Barooah said trade would be boosted by an expected move by the
> Indian
> >>  >> and Myanmar governments to expand the list of mostly agricultural
> >>  >> commodities allowed to be traded by land between northeast India and
> >>  >> Myanmar, from 27 to 42 items.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> "The northeast is the closest land mass connecting the dynamic
> >>  >> economies of south and Southeast Asia," said Pradyut Bordoloi,
> Assam's
> >>  >> minister for power and industries. "Besides deep-rooted cultural
> >>  >> linkages, we can reap multidimensional benefits in this era of
> >>  >> regional economic cooperation."
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Bordoloi is closely associated with a campaign to reopen the World
> War
> >>  >> II-era Stillwell Road, connecting Assam's town of Ledo to southwest
> >>  >> China.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> "If reopened, this would be the shortest surface route to Yunnan
> >>  >> province of China and other Southeast Asian countries hooking onto
> the
> >>  >> trans-Asian highways," he said.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> The road served as the supply line into China during Japan's wartime
> >>  >> occupation, but it was shut after India's independence from Britain
> in
> >>  >> 1947.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Bordoloi said his campaign to reopen the road, initiated after he
> >>  >> became a state legislator in 1998, scored a victory when India
> >>  >> upgraded the road to a full-fledged national highway, developing it
> up
> >>  >> to the Indo-Myanmar border.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Officials say infrastructure development, power, bamboo-based
> >>  >> industries, orchids and organic foods are prospective areas of
> >>  >> cooperation with Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> But significant hurdles remain, including concerns that booming
> trade
> >>  >> relations may fuel rises in insurgency, narco-terrorism and AIDS,
> all
> >>  >> of which plague the northeast. Security in the region is tight, with
> >>  >> the army out in force to combat armed groups battling for greater
> >>  >> autonomy or independence from India.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> "The official restrictions that prevail in northeast India -- in
> terms
> >>  >> of travel, land and labor markets -- are hardly conducive to
> intensive
> >>  >> cross-border economic relations," said Baruah, the political science
> >>  >> professor.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> "Both the reality of insurgencies in the region and the security
> >>  >> anxiety of the government of India . . . are major obstacles to
> >>  >> dynamic cross-border economic ties," he added, calling current
> efforts
> >>  >> hardly more than "a bare beginning."
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Also, Baruah said, it was difficult to imagine a big increase in
> trade
> >>  >> given the political situation in military-led Myanmar.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> India's relations with China, a country it has long regarded with
> >>  >> distrust since a 1962 border war, would also have to become much
> more
> >>  >> relaxed, Baruah said.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >> _______________________________________________
> >>  >> assam mailing list
> >>  >> assam at assamnet.org
> >>  >> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > _______________________________________________
> >>  > assam mailing list
> >>  > assam at assamnet.org
> >>  > http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
> >>  >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  assam mailing list
> >>  assam at assamnet.org
> >>  http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Manoj Kumar Das
> >C 172 GF, Sarvodaya Enclave
> >New Delhi 17 India
> >0091 9312650558 (HP) 9910972654
> >_______________________________________________
> >assam mailing list
> >assam at assamnet.org
> >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>



-- 
Manoj Kumar Das
C 172 GF, Sarvodaya Enclave
New Delhi 17 India
0091 9312650558 (HP) 9910972654



More information about the Assam mailing list