[Assam] force is effective only as a preventative
Chan Mahanta
cmahanta at gmail.com
Fri Jun 4 13:34:23 PDT 2010
>For the rest of it, all I can say is that you seem to have a very
slanted
>view of Middle East history. So be it.
**** Sushanta's view is slanted ? I'll be danged ! Coming from an
upstanding and righteous one like you Ram,
the likes of me must be standing on our heads :-) .
On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>> "the Jews or the Arabs." Jews are religious group. Arab are not.
>> Most of
> the Arab are Muslim these
>> days, But all the Mulsims are not Arab.
>
> Thanks for enlightening me. If you hadn't told me, I wouldn't have
> known.
>
>> Your information only establish my point that Jews didn't achieved
>> the sate
>> through any legitimate struggle. Their dream based on mythology
>> do not
>> justify their aspiration.
>
> The problem is .. nor can the Arabs. They too don't have an absolute
> claim.
> The whole area was ruled by the Brits. The Arabs too base their
> claim on
> mythology. Abraham, had a child, Ishmail through his servant, and
> that is
> the Arab claim - also based on mythology, Old Testament and Bibilical
> narratives.
>
> In any case, for many centuries, both Jewish and Arabs lived
> peacefully
> side-by-side. In fact, even the Koran cites examples where the Arabs
> often
> had Jews to support them in fighting enemies.
>
> So, the only thing one can logically go by is recent history. I am
> not going
> to talk about imperial this or imperial that - specially sitting and
> enjoying the fruits & benefits of a democracy.
>
> For the rest of it, all I can say is that you seem to have a very
> slanted
> view of Middle East history. So be it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Sushanta Kar
> <pragyan.tsc50 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> "the Jews or the Arabs."
>> Jews are religious group. Arab are not. Most of the Arab are
>> Muslim these
>> days, But all the Mulsims are not Arab.
>> "US/UK will exist"
>> Sure ! why not! They are most developed nations of the world . who
>> deny
>> that!
>> But, not the Imperialist! The colonialist! People of both the great
>> country
>> will fight those Ruling elite! And they are fighting.
>>
>> All the " ill-will toward these countries" will be there till date
>> they
>> earn
>> all their wealth by exploiting labor, natural resources of third
>> world
>> countries like us.
>> "The Jewish State was created by the Brits as a fallout of
>> Nazi ....UK did
>> not want Jews coming in droves into the UK, "
>> Thank you for recognizing the fact. This is one among many. But
>> true. cBrits pulled back
>> Palestines only to save their own nation! Brits pulled back
>> Palestines only to save their own nation! What a democratic value!
>> And after doing all these injustice to a independent nation, while
>> the
>> people there fight the British ill doing, they are being marked as
>> terrorist!
>> What a judgment!
>>
>> Your information only establish my point that Jews didn't achieved
>> the sate
>> through any legitimate struggle. Their dream based on mythology
>> do not
>> justify their aspiration. If so then tomorrow Indonesian Hindus can
>> claim
>> that India is their mythical country . so they have every right to
>> come and
>> sattel down here!
>>
>> Sushanta
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 June 2010 22:31, Ram Sarangapani <assamrs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sushanta,
>>>
>>> While you are certainly entitled to your views, just to put things
>>> in
>>> context, and without hyperbole:
>>>
>>> The Jewish State was created by the Brits as a fallout of Nazi
>>> Germany's
>>> attrocities in the German concentartion camps, and the fact that
>>> the UK
>> did
>>> not want Jews coming in droves into the UK, and add to that the Jews
>>> believe
>>> (just like the Arabs believe) that Abraham (from the Old Testament)
>>> bestowed
>>> the region to the Jews.
>>>
>>> The history is murky at best to definitely claim that the region
>>> belongs
>> to
>>> the Jews or the Arabs. All we can go on is recent history. If you
>>> want to
>>> start blaming one group or another, you will be doing so for a
>>> long time.
>>> Both Arabs and Jews must find a way to live in peace.
>>>
>>> We know this much that many don't want Israel to exist at all.
>>> Well, that
>>> is
>>> only a pipe dream. Israel will exist, just like India will exist,
>>> and the
>>> US/UK will exist inspite of many who harbor ill-will toward these
>>> countries.
>>> They will exist inspite of people taking full advantage of the
>>> benefits
>> of
>>> language, culture, opportunities, education, advancement etc
>>> offered by
>>> these countries, and in return hate them and wish to do them harm.
>>> Unfortunately, that is the nature of the world.
>>>
>>> --Ram da
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Sushanta Kar <pragyan.tsc50 at gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear
>>>> Ramda,
>>>> I've tried to understand the points of the article. but failed
>>>> because
>>> of
>>>> my inability to understand the language well.
>>>> All I understood is the writer has a deep sympathy with the Zionist
>>> state.
>>>> Which I don't have. To my understanding it is not a legitimate
>>>> state.
>>>> Had there been a state for Jews being achieved after a prolong
>> freedom
>>>> struggle in Palestine like Bangladesh I would have no problem. .
>>>> Or I
>>> will
>>>> have no problem with Swadhin Axom if ULFA achieve it. Because all
>>>> the
>>>> residence of that state would be the Khilonjiya of that newly
>>>> created
>>>> state.
>>>>
>>>> But that was not the case with the Jews.How it would have been if
>>>> all
>> the
>>>> Bauddhist of the world irrespective of their languages and
>>>> races were
>>>> being invited to come India and create an independent state in
>>>> India
>>> and
>>>> make all the Indian second grade citizen only because the religion
>>>> originated here. That too under the gun of imperialist British, who
>> ruled
>>>> the country for more than two century. Israil is such a country.
>>>> Jew,
>>>> irrespective of their languages and culture, came from whole
>>>> world to
>>>> create
>>>> Israel out of Palestine.
>>>> Israel is just like a police out post of US & British
>>>> imperialist in
>>> the
>>>> Oil rich middle east. A living Human Bomb created by their
>>>> imperialist
>>>> masters.
>>>> If the world have to be free from their hegemony end
>>>> exploitation (
>>> sidha
>>>> kothat koboloi gole Tel Curir Aru Ostror Bojaror pora mukti paboloi
>> gole
>>> )
>>>> Israel will have to go in present form. And it will go. The
>>>> freedom
>>>> loving
>>>> world will never let Israel to leave in peace. Or It would be
>>>> better to
>>>> say,
>>>> Israel will not let the freedom and peace loving world to leave
>>>> with
>>> peace
>>>> till it exist!
>>>> Thats what My understanding. I know you will not agree!
>>>> Sushanta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4 June 2010 19:48, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> the flotilla was not about humanitarian relief but about breaking
>> the
>>>>>> blockade,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *** so it is just to starve off the Palestians? Awesome argument,
>> ain't
>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 4, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Sushanta,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As an extension to our discussions, here is a column from the
>>> Washington
>>>>>> Post. While I don't particularly agree with what Krauthammer
>>>>>> writes,
>>> in
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> particular case, he seems to get it right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just because it is the US, the UK or Israel or the GOI or GOA,
>>>>>> they
>>> are
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> the root cause of all worldly problems and issues, and those
>>>>>> against
>>>> them
>>>>>> are always the victims.
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> *****Why was the offer refused? Because, as organizer Greta
>>>>>> Berlin
>>>>>> admitted,
>>>>>> the flotilla was not about humanitarian relief but about breaking
>> the
>>>>>> blockade, i.e., ending Israel's inspection regime, which would
>>>>>> mean
>>>>>> unlimited shipping into Gaza and thus the unlimited arming of
>>>>>> Hamas.
>> *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Israel has already **twice intercepted ships
>>>>>> laden*<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A16637-2002Jan8?language=printer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> * with Iranian arms destined for Hezbollah and Gaza. What country
>>> would
>>>>>> allow that?********** (from the article)*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, what country interested in their safety and well-being
>>>>>> turn a
>>> blind
>>>>>> eye. Now, Hamas/Turkey is planning to send another "humanitarian"
>>> ship.
>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>> To test Israel?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The article is below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Ram da
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> *Those troublesome Jews
>>>>>> *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Charles Krauthammer
>>>>>> Friday, June 4, 2010; A19
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The world is outraged at Israel's blockade of Gaza. Turkey
>>>>>> denounces
>>> its
>>>>>> illegality<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.mfa.gov.tr/address-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-republic-of-turkey-at-the-united-nations_-31-may-2010_-new-york.en.mfa
>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>> inhumanity, barbarity, etc. The usual U.N. suspects, Third
>>>>>> World and
>>>>>> European, join in. The Obama administration dithers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But as Leslie Gelb<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-05-31/israel-was-right-to-board-the-gaza-flotilla/
>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>> former president of the Council on Foreign Relations, writes, the
>>>> blockade
>>>>>> is not just perfectly rational, it is perfectly legal. Gaza under
>>> Hamas
>>>> is
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> self-declared enemy of Israel -- a declaration backed up by more
>> than
>>>>>> 4,000
>>>>>> rockets fired at Israeli civilian territory. Yet having pledged
>> itself
>>>> to
>>>>>> unceasing belligerency, Hamas claims victimhood when Israel
>>>>>> imposes
>> a
>>>>>> blockade to prevent Hamas from arming itself with still more
>> rockets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In World War II, with full international legality, the United
>>>>>> States
>>>>>> blockaded Germany and Japan. And during the October 1962 missile
>>> crisis,
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> blockaded ("quarantined") Cuba. Arms-bearing Russian ships
>>>>>> headed to
>>>> Cuba
>>>>>> turned back because the Soviets knew that the U.S. Navy would
>>>>>> either
>>>> board
>>>>>> them or sink them. Yet Israel is accused of international
>> criminality
>>>> for
>>>>>> doing precisely what John Kennedy did: impose a naval blockade to
>>>> prevent
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> hostile state from acquiring lethal weaponry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, but weren't the Gaza-bound ships on a mission of humanitarian
>>>> relief?
>>>>>> No. Otherwise they would have accepted Israel's offer to bring
>>>>>> their
>>>>>> supplies to an Israeli
>>>>>> port<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/israel-gaza-aid-convoy-can-unload-cargo-in-ashdod-for-inspection-1.292560
>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>> be inspected for military materiel and have the rest trucked by
>> Israel
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> Gaza -- as every week 10,000 tons of food, medicine and other
>>>> humanitarian
>>>>>> supplies are sent by Israel to Gaza.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why was the offer refused? Because, as organizer Greta Berlin
>>> admitted,
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> flotilla was not about humanitarian relief but about breaking the
>>>>>> blockade,
>>>>>> i.e., ending Israel's inspection regime, which would mean
>>>>>> unlimited
>>>>>> shipping
>>>>>> into Gaza and thus the unlimited arming of Hamas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Israel has already twice intercepted ships
>>>>>> laden<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A16637-2002Jan8?language=printer
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>> Iranian arms destined for Hezbollah and Gaza. What country would
>> allow
>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But even more important, why did Israel even have to resort to
>>> blockade?
>>>>>> Because, blockade is Israel's fallback as the world
>>>>>> systematically
>>>>>> de-legitimizes its traditional ways of defending itself --
>>>>>> forward
>> and
>>>>>> active defense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (1) *Forward defense*: As a small, densely populated country
>>> surrounded
>>>> by
>>>>>> hostile states, Israel had, for its first half-century, adopted
>>> forward
>>>>>> defense -- fighting wars on enemy territory (such as the Sinai
>>>>>> and
>>> Golan
>>>>>> Heights) rather than its own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where possible (Sinai, for example) Israel has traded territory
>>>>>> for
>>>> peace.
>>>>>> But where peace offers were refused, Israel retained the
>>>>>> territory
>> as
>>> a
>>>>>> protective buffer zone. Thus Israel retained a small strip of
>> southern
>>>>>> Lebanon to protect the villages of northern Israel. And it took
>>>>>> many
>>>>>> losses
>>>>>> in Gaza, rather than expose Israeli border towns to Palestinian
>> terror
>>>>>> attacks. It is for the same reason America wages a grinding war
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> Afghanistan: You fight them there, so you don't have to fight
>>>>>> them
>>> here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But under overwhelming outside pressure, Israel gave it up. The
>>> Israelis
>>>>>> were told the occupations were not just illegal but at the root
>>>>>> of
>> the
>>>>>> anti-Israel insurgencies -- and therefore withdrawal, by removing
>> the
>>>>>> cause,
>>>>>> would bring peace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Land for peace. Remember? Well, during the past decade, Israel
>>>>>> gave
>>> the
>>>>>> land
>>>>>> -- evacuating South Lebanon in 2000 and Gaza in 2005. What did it
>> get?
>>>> An
>>>>>> intensification of belligerency, heavy militarization of the
>>>>>> enemy
>>> side,
>>>>>> multiple kidnappings, cross-border attacks and, from Gaza,
>>>>>> years of
>>>>>> unrelenting rocket attack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (2) *Active defense*: Israel then had to switch to active
>>>>>> defense --
>>>>>> military action to disrupt, dismantle and
>>>>>> defeat<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-on-a-New-Strategy-for-Afghanistan-and-Pakistan/
>>>>>>> (to
>>>>>> borrow President Obama's description of our campaign against the
>>>>>> Taliban
>>>>>> and al-Qaeda) the newly armed terrorist mini-states established
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> southern
>>>>>> Lebanon and Gaza after Israel withdrew.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The result? The Lebanon war of 2006 and Gaza operation of
>>>>>> 2008-09.
>>> They
>>>>>> were
>>>>>> met with yet another avalanche of opprobrium and calumny by the
>>>>>> same
>>>>>> international community that had demanded the land-for-peace
>>>>>> Israeli
>>>>>> withdrawals in the first place. Worse, the U.N. Goldstone
>>>>>> report<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/14/AR2009111402279.html
>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>> which essentially criminalized Israel's defensive operation in
>>>>>> Gaza
>>>> while
>>>>>> whitewashing the *casus belli* -- the *preceding* and unprovoked
>> Hamas
>>>>>> rocket war -- effectively de-legitimized any active Israeli
>>>>>> defense
>>>>>> against
>>>>>> its self-declared terror enemies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (3) *Passive defense*: Without forward or active defense,
>>>>>> Israel is
>>> left
>>>>>> with but the most passive and benign of all defenses -- a
>>>>>> blockade
>> to
>>>>>> simply
>>>>>> prevent enemy rearmament. Yet, as we speak, this too is headed
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> international de-legitimation. Even the United States is now
>>>>>> moving
>>>> toward
>>>>>> having it abolished.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, if none of these is permissible, what's left?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, but that's the point. It's the point understood by the
>>>>>> blockade-busting
>>>>>> flotilla of useful idiots and terror sympathizers, by the Turkish
>>> front
>>>>>> organization that funded it, by the automatic anti-Israel Third
>> World
>>>>>> chorus
>>>>>> at the United Nations, and by the supine Europeans who've had
>>>>>> quite
>>>> enough
>>>>>> of the Jewish problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's left? Nothing. The whole point of this relentless
>> international
>>>>>> campaign is to deprive Israel of *any* legitimate form of
>>> self-defense.
>>>>>> Why,
>>>>>> just last week, the Obama administration joined the jackals, and
>>>> reversed
>>>>>> four decades of U.S. practice, by signing onto a consensus
>>>>>> document<
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/29/AR2010052902304.html
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>> singles out Israel's possession of nuclear weapons -- thus
>>>>>> de-legitimizing Israel's very last line of defense: deterrence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The world is tired of these troublesome Jews, 6 million -- that
>> number
>>>>>> again
>>>>>> -- hard by the Mediterranean, refusing every invitation to
>>>>>> national
>>>>>> suicide.
>>>>>> For which they are relentlessly demonized, ghettoized and
>> constrained
>>>> from
>>>>>> defending themselves, even as the more committed anti-Zionists --
>>>> Iranian
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> particular -- openly prepare a more final solution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> letters@ charleskrauthammer.com <letters@
>>>>>> %20charleskrauthammer.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Sushanta Kar <
>> pragyan.tsc50 at gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well said and good suggestion Utamda! I could have avoid the word
>>>>>>> 'bloody'
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> No comments anymore for now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sushanta
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3 June 2010 12:17, uttam borthakur <uttamborthakur at yahoo.co.in
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Sushanta,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The analogy between the "Emperor" and the "Pirate" applies
>>>>>>>> here.
>> The
>>>>>>>> "Emperor" (Alexander) molested the world, but had retained the
>> right
>>>> to
>>>>>>>> punish the "Pirate", who had molested a few ships. The reason
>>>>>>>> for
>>> this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> view
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is obvious; there would be no end to this debate, as the debate
>> has
>>>> not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> resolved even by 'war', the extreme method of seeking a
>> resolution.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But at the same time, use of less adjectives, and more of
>>>>>>>> reasons,
>>>> would
>>>>>>>> augur well for an argument. The use of the word 'concrete' by a
>>> German
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lady
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (who was a communist, but Gestapo could not ascertain her
>>>>>>>> leanings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> severe interrogation) at the fag end of an inqusition gave her
>> away
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Refer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to: The God that Failed) . So, it would be better to stick to
>>> admitted
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> facts
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (even what is fact for you may not be fact for another) beyond
>>>> reproach
>>>>>>>> would make your case stronger, and even your detractors would
>>>>>>>> keep
>> a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> guarded
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> silence or stay away from entering a debate or try to evade the
>> moot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> issues,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> unless they have a vested interest in scoring over you. :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just tell me why should you call the British 'bloody'; the
>>>>>>>> empire
>>>> could
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> do otherwise than to set up an empire, because the growth of
>>>> mercantile
>>>>>>>> activities had to find a market world-wide; just like the
>>>>>>>> present
>>> US,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cannot do without looting the scarce fossil fuel of the
>> middle-east.
>>>> If
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rely only on their own resources, the domestic prices would
>>>>>>>> soar,
>>>>>>>> transportation costs will increase, all bills would go high,
>>>>>>>> and
>> the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> halcyon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> days now reigning in the US may end up in a dated 'concept' of
>>> 'armed
>>>>>>>> rebellion' ( the citizens have more liberty to carry weapons
>>>>>>>> than
>> in
>>>> our
>>>>>>>> place) for which they have already put in place the Homeland
>>> Security
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'idea'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> instead of 'concept'!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Uttam Kumar Borthakur
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sushnta Kar
>>>>>>> সুশান্ত কর
>>>>>>> তিনসুকিয়া, আসাম
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> আমার ব্লগগুলি:
>>>>>>> http://sushantakar40.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> http://ishankonerkahini.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> http://ishankonerkotha.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> আমার সম্পাদিত 'প্রজ্ঞান'
>>>>>>> http://pragyan06now.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/pragyan06now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "স্বাজাত্যের অহমিকার
>>>>>>> থেকে মুক্তি দানের
>>>>>>> শিক্ষাই, আজকের দিনের
>>>>>>> প্রধান
>>>>>>> শিক্ষা"
>>>>>>> রবীন্দ্রনাথ
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sushnta Kar
>>>> সুশান্ত কর
>>>> তিনসুকিয়া, আসাম
>>>>
>>>> আমার ব্লগগুলি:
>>>> http://sushantakar40.blogspot.com
>>>> http://ishankonerkahini.blogspot.com
>>>> http://ishankonerkotha.blogspot.com
>>>> আমার সম্পাদিত 'প্রজ্ঞান'
>>>> http://pragyan06now.blogspot.com
>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/pragyan06now
>>>>
>>>> "স্বাজাত্যের অহমিকার
>>>> থেকে মুক্তি দানের
>>>> শিক্ষাই, আজকের দিনের
>>>> প্রধান
>>> শিক্ষা"
>>>> রবীন্দ্রনাথ
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sushnta Kar
>> সুশান্ত কর
>> তিনসুকিয়া, আসাম
>>
>> আমার ব্লগগুলি:
>> http://sushantakar40.blogspot.com
>> http://ishankonerkahini.blogspot.com
>> http://ishankonerkotha.blogspot.com
>> আমার সম্পাদিত 'প্রজ্ঞান'
>> http://pragyan06now.blogspot.com
>> http://sites.google.com/site/pragyan06now
>>
>> "স্বাজাত্যের অহমিকার
>> থেকে মুক্তি দানের
>> শিক্ষাই, আজকের দিনের
>> প্রধান শিক্ষা"
>> রবীন্দ্রনাথ
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> assam at assamnet.org
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
More information about the Assam
mailing list