[Assam] Armed Revolution is an Outdated Concept

[Chan Mahanta]

 >Unfortunately,  Assamnet does not have a search feature but I  
promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.

*** Is it therefore the fault of assamnet?

It now established that the attribute was a pure fabrication, a bald  
faced lie.  But you cannot muster that bit of integrity
to admit it, instead blaming it on assamnet for not having the search  
engine, for if it did, you surely would have dug-up the
evidence.

What a shame! Very unbecoming.






On May 24, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:

> I am honored to see that I am placed in same row as many others  
> including Kamath and those who are supporting his article . All are  
> perfect idiots.   I am sure there are plenty of Idiots around whom  
> you would not like.
>
>
> Why are you shying from the point .... have you, the champion of  
> human rights,  ever criticized ULFA (or maoists) for killing  
> innocents ?  And if not  what is the reason ?
>
> Coming to exact point (on what you said) ,  yes you did not say  
> these exact words ....  I was mocking what you actually said --- you  
> actually put the blame of killing these children on GOI -- you said  
> GOI is responsible for sending these children.  And as we have seen  
> in this net for years  ,  you will use all your twisting to  put the  
> blame on GOI even if it means going to an absurd level.
>
> Unfortunately,  Assamnet does not have a search feature but I  
> promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.
>
> But that does not dilute my questions to Susanta (and you,  you were  
> gaga on Susanta's comment) --  if one is to show Gandhism to those  
> who killed children or villagers why one should not show Gandhism to  
> a rapist or a murderer ?
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but
>> camoflauged  Indian killers )
>
>
> *** That is presented as a quote from myself.
>
> Is it something I said or even implied? Show netters when or where you
> saw that coming from me.
>
> Fact is, it is a malicious fabrication of the basest kind. A bald
> faced lie.
>
> People who are able to articulate a credible opposing view do not need
> to resort to such tactics of fabricating
> false statements to counter something one does not agree with. It is a
> thoroughly dishonorable pursuit.
>
> But I can appreciate the fact that such things as honor, personal
> integrity etc. are not necessary
> accouterments even of  degrees with pedigree.
>
>
>> but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for ULFA.
>
> *** Is that therefore your PROOF  that I said what you claim I did?
> Only a perfect IDIOT  would make such a claim.
> I have seen only one other assamnetter make such arguments in my
> entire tenure here spanning
> nearly 15 years.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>
>> I will be happy to be proved as a liar ... but that means ULFA
>> killed innocent civillians/children.  Did I ever see ANY words of
>> criticizm from you ?  You are all over on human rights violation and
>> what not  but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for
>> ULFA.
>> Double standards ?
>>
>>
>> *****************************************************
>>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but camoflauged  Indian
>> killers )
>>
>> No need to be bald faced liar in attributing such a statement to me.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 22, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>
>>> Sure you are finding a strong supporter in C'da  but let me ask --
>>> does "Armed Suppression by the state"  exist in every state of
>>> India  or is it in certain states/regions ?  If it is in certain
>>> regions ,  why is it needed ? Just because GOI do not like the
>>> people of some region ?
>>>    You are asking to show Gandhiism to some people who killed  
>>> children
>>> in Dhemaji (oh well C'da says they were not children but
>>> camoflauged  Indian killers )  or those who killed a bus load of
>>> common villagers ?
>>> Show me one country where such Gandhiism exist.
>>> What about showing Gandhiism to a thief or murderer or rapist ?  Why
>>> have police and courts ?  The world can run on Gandhiism .
>>>
>>> *******************
>>> "No mercy should be shown to them. Their headquarters have to be
>>> bombed. An
>>> organization responsible for the killing of upwards of 6,000
>>> innocent people
>>> from 1996 to 2009 has to be wiped out of the surface of the earth."
>>> "Armed Suppression by the state should be outdated first to make
>>> Armed Revolution  Outdated" It's not a theory but possibly can be
>>> termed as
>>> a natural law.
>>> That's all !
>>> What a country we have! we fought British following Gandhian way,
>>> but we
>>> talk to fight our own people  with Arms---forget Gandhism  ! Our
>>> state
>>> doesn't follow Gandhism, just use it to  advice people!
>>> Sushanta Kar
>>> On 22 May 2010 09:02, UTTAM BORTHAKUR <uttamborthakur at
>>> yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>>>> Armed revolts are stated to be outdated; the statement is not new.
>>>> But, what we find is it continues to this modern day.
>>>> Kamath trying to shoo a nagging bee away with his wishy-washy.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org