[Air-l] Trouble with journals

[Christian Nelson]

Interesting idea, but where would editing fit into the process? Do  
raw manuscripts get rated, then edited, and then posted to the  
official journal?


On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:34 AM, James Whyte wrote:

> The issue of peer review could be eliminated by peer rating (all  
> readers)
>
>   James
>
> John Postill <jpostill at usa.net> wrote:
>   ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:54:32 AM BST
> From: "John Postill"
> To: "Maximilian C. Forte" ,
>
> Subject: [Medianthro] Trouble with journals
>
> Max Forte wrote:
>
>> I am
>> also a very passionate proponent of open access publishing, and in  
>> that
> vein
> I am the
>> editor of a specialized, peer reviewed journal titled, KACIKE: The  
>> Journal
> of Caribbean
>> Amerindian History and Anthropology (at www.kacike.org), which has
> encountered absolutely
>> *none* of the problems that opponents of open access journals  
>> normally
> list.
>>
>
> I'm glad Max has brought up the subject of journals as I've been  
> discussing
> this issue with colleagues recently and it seems to me (and others)  
> that
> something's seriously wrong with how the system works. I've  
> experienced
> firsthand and heard stories of journal submissions where one is  
> kept waiting
> anything between 12 and 24 months before hearing any substantial  
> news, and
> that's after having chased this up with the journal a number of  
> times. At the
> same time, authors are not allowed to submit the same piece to another
> journal, so often at the end of a very long wait a rejection comes and
> they're
> back to square one having wasted precious months.
>
> It's clear that people are busy and that peer reviews take time,  
> but should
> we
> really have to wait 12-15 months, or even longer, for a response?  
> Perhaps
> journals should commit themselves to a reasonable waiting period  
> (say, max 4
> months) and publish figures of the time it takes them on average to  
> get back
> to prospective contributors? Or perhaps contributors themselves should
> publish
> or circulate these figures in the public domain?
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> ******************************************
>
> EASA Media Anthropology Network
> http://www.media-anthropology.net
>
> For further information please contact:
> Dr John Postill
> Sheffield Hallam University, UK
> jpostill at usa.net
>
> To manage your subscription to this mailing list, visit:
>
> http://lists.easaonline.org/listinfo.cgi/medianthro-easaonline.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The air-l at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http:// 
> listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
>  Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> _______________________________________________
> The air-l at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http:// 
> listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/