[Air-L] Religious Dimension of Sustainable Development

[Christian Nelson]

I hope you'll pardon me if observe that your response is kind of  
funny--it finds anthropology "sub-scientific," something that a lot  
of anthropologists would find quite disrespectful, though you've  
objected to the implication that you are "sub-human."

On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:56 AM, Barry Saunders wrote:

> indeed, but i'm interested in the scientific proof. Anthropological  
> evidence doesn't really count as 'scientific proof'.
>
> No disrespect to anthropology intended though - I'm curious as to  
> how anyone could scientifically test the hypothesis - particularly  
> how they judge what a fulfilled human is.