[Air-L] Religious Dimension of Sustainable Development

[Barry Saunders]

it's not sub-scientific. it's just not scientific.

completely different approach. you can't get a scientific proof from an anthropological approach.




--
Barry Saunders
----
http://investigativeblog.net
http://gatewatching.org
http://youdecide2007.org
----
PhD Candidate // researcher
http://creativeindustries.qut.edu.au
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/view/person/Saunders,_Barry.html
ph: 07 3138 0155
skype: barry_saunders
CRICOS No. 00213J

________________________________________
From: air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org] On Behalf Of Christian Nelson [xianknelson at mac.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 8:21 PM
To: air-l at listserv.aoir.org
Subject: Re: [Air-L] Religious Dimension of Sustainable Development

I hope you'll pardon me if observe that your response is kind of
funny--it finds anthropology "sub-scientific," something that a lot
of anthropologists would find quite disrespectful, though you've
objected to the implication that you are "sub-human."

On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:56 AM, Barry Saunders wrote:

> indeed, but i'm interested in the scientific proof. Anthropological
> evidence doesn't really count as 'scientific proof'.
>
> No disrespect to anthropology intended though - I'm curious as to
> how anyone could scientifically test the hypothesis - particularly
> how they judge what a fulfilled human is.
_______________________________________________
The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org

Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
http://www.aoir.org/