[Air-L] Facebook data goes public
live
human.factor.one at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 11:39:47 PST 2010
I'm pretty sure this is not build recently - so, hence, not in
reaction to Facebook's change in architecture.
I think perhaps Facebook made the change because of people like Warden
who were spidering the public profiles; just like people spidered the
web for content years ago.
-Sharon
On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Michael Zimmer wrote:
> I tend to agree with Jacob. I haven't had the chance to fully
> process/ponder this case (teaching today), but it seems that using
> an exploit based on Facebook's recent change in architecture -- when
> not all users have fully understood the consequences of said change
> -- to harvest profile information is extremely problematic from a
> research ethics pov.
>
> I'll blog about this later, and hope to start a conversation at http://www.internetresearchethics.org
> as well.
>
> -michael.
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Zimmer, PhD
> Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies
> Associate, Center for Information Policy Research
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> e: zimmerm at uwm.edu
> w: www.michaelzimmer.org
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Jacob Kramer-Duffield wrote:
>
>> I will respectfully disagree about the goodness of this news.
>>
>> " Warden says he's removed identifying profile URLs but kept names,
>> locations, Fan page lists and partial Friends lists."
>>
>> Did he ask permission? I know these are "public" profiles - or were
>> when indexed, anyways - but being an individual and having a public
>> profile is a different thing than being aggregated as part of a
>> massive data set.
>>
>> This is an issue of power. Zuckerberg can talk about the end of
>> privacy because his privilege guarantees that there won't be
>> negative consequences to his publicity (and this would be true even
>> if he weren't CEO of Facebook). A clever coder can talk about the
>> "sneaky" ways you can use your friends' e-mails and Mechanical Turk
>> to mass-harvest profiles from Facebook.
>>
>> But that doesn't speak to the ethical responsibilities that we have
>> as academic researchers. I don't think that the way that Facebook
>> handles its' users data is responsible, and I don't think that
>> figuring out ways to exploit that handling is responsible, either.
>>
>> Jacob
>>
>> On 2/9/10 9:14 AM, Stefania Muca wrote:
>>> Hello, I just wanted to share the good news :)
>>>
>>> http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_user_data_analysis.php
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>>
>>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>>> http://www.aoir.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://
>> aoir.org
>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>
>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> http://www.aoir.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
More information about the Air-L
mailing list