[Air-L] Including screennames with tweets
Zytko, Douglas
daz2 at njit.edu
Fri Jul 13 10:30:43 PDT 2018
Hi Becky,
Regarding your last messages - anonymizing tweets does not air on
plagiarism (in my opinion) because you are not claiming the tweets as your
own. Regarding the discussion at large - a middle ground between
anonymizing and not anonymizing tweets (as Casey just beat me to
mentioning) would perhaps be to request the consent of the individuals who
made the tweets that you wish to publish.
I'm also a bit concerned with word "names" being used perhaps
interchangeably with "twitter handles." Twitter handles can change hands,
and there are various examples you can find online of people offering to
pay others for their twitter handles because the handle matches their real
name, business identity, etc. While I'm not asserting that this is a common
occurrence, there is always the chance that you may unintentionally
misattribute a non-anonymized tweet for this reason. (Requesting consent
would address this issue).
-Doug
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Casey Lynn Fiesler <
Casey.Fiesler at colorado.edu> wrote:
> Particularly given the kinds of concerns Rebecca has brought up, keep in
> mind that another option is to ask permission to publish content, or to ask
> whether they would like their handle included or not. If it’s a small
> number this might not be very arduous. You then might choose to include
> content if you don’t hear back from them - that you’re only checking for
> people who express discomfort. Here is a paper with an ethical
> considerations section at the end where they explain a process like this:
> http://jesspater.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Hunger-Hurts-but-Starving-
> Works.pdf
>
> Casey
>
> On Jul 13, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Hayes, Rebecca M <hayes2r at cmich.edu<mailto:
> hayes2r at cmich.edu>> wrote:
>
> Also I, of course, considered more than "it is public" but extensively
> whether I think it causes harm either way.
>
>
> Thanks Again,
>
> Becky
>
> ________________________________
> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l-bounces@
> listserv.aoir.org>> on behalf of Hayes, Rebecca M <hayes2r at cmich.edu
> <mailto:hayes2r at cmich.edu>>
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 6:43:02 PM
> To: Jacobs, Naomi; air-l at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Including screennames with tweets
>
> I really appreciate this discussion. It has helped me think through a lot.
> At first I had deleted all names. But I want to clarify that I am using
> tweets as examples in my book, for discussions
> of particular hashtags. In all there are 12 tweets. All of them are
> demonstrating an example, and in a positive light. After these discussions
> we chose to delete the one example that was critical.
>
> My main concern after all of this discussion and why I think I should
> include the names (in this case), is because who am I to not cite other
> peoples work? It airs on plagirism if I do not. And as academic I think we
> often fall into a paternalistic mindset thinking we know better than people
> about what they want or what they know. This is a public forum and we have
> to expect and respect that they know that, and in my case none of the
> public tweets I am using are presenting the users in negative ways (that I
> know of). This was such a hard decision to make!
>
> Again thank you. This has been a very helpful discussion and I think that
> context matters in every one of these decisions.
>
> Best,
> Becky
> ________________________________
> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l-bounces@
> listserv.aoir.org>> on behalf of Jacobs, Naomi <naomi.jacobs at abdn.ac.uk<
> mailto:naomi.jacobs at abdn.ac.uk>>
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 6:28:43 PM
> To: air-l at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Including screennames with tweets
>
> Hi all,
>
> I agree with those suggesting that context is important, and that the
> consideration should be what harm may be caused.
>
> In terms of potential solutions for anonymity, in some recent work (in
> press) I took the decision to anonymise the content of tweets by changing
> each quoted tweet in one of the following two ways: by either swapping
> words or phrases in a linked clause, or by substituting a word for a close
> synonym. This hopefully retained the content and emotional weight while
> preventing a simple search for the tweet. This is in a case study of
> conflict between members of a particular online community, and a commercial
> organisation.
>
> By contrast, in a different context where the quoted tweet was a neutral
> statement related to an experience had by the user in their daily life, I
> contacted them to ask permission to quote verbatim with their username (and
> was granted it).
>
> Naomi
>
>
> Dr Naomi Jacobs
> Research Fellow
> TrustLens Project
> Department of Computing Science
> University of Aberdeen
>
> +44 (0)1224 274564
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Air-L [mailto:air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org] On Behalf Of Casey
> Lynn Fiesler
> Sent: 13 July 2018 17:08
> To: Tarleton L. Gillespie <tlg28 at cornell.edu<mailto:tlg28 at cornell.edu>>
> Cc: air-l at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Including screennames with tweets
>
> Nick already mentioned out recent research about this, but I’ll just chime
> in and add a few thoughts:
>
> It hasn’t come up at all what the subject matter of the papers/books are.
> I think that this is really relevant to an ethical analysis of this
> situation, because it goes to potential harm. There’s a big difference
> between “here is a tweet from someone talking about what they had for
> breakfast” and “here is a tweet from someone showing signs of a mental
> illness” or “here is a tweet from a political dissident who might be in
> physical danger”. Whether or not online content is PUBLIC is an important
> contextual factor (because of course if it’s not public, that’s a problem),
> but in my opinion should not be the only thing relevant for this decision.
>
> Though it’s also worth pointing out that if the tweet is something that
> could actually lead to harm, the issue isn’t publishing the handle or not -
> because public tweets can be easily searched. In that case, it might be
> better not to quote a tweet verbatim, or to use composites.
>
> As Tarleton says, the issue is whether a certain use is required to
> describe the work, which goes to a cost/benefit analysis. If it’s a tweet
> about breakfast that should be a different analysis than a tweet about a
> health condition. For the latter, you might want a more compelling reason
> for why the tweet needs to be there.
>
> The account name issue is even more tricky because depending on the
> context, it is possible there could be harm by not giving someone CREDIT
> for their content. But unless that kind of thing is likely - given what
> Nick and I found, unless there’s a reason that a handle has explanatory
> value it seems to just add another layer of potential discomfort for the
> unknowing research participants.
>
> That said, there are different norms in different communities about this
> kind of thing. What I’d like most to see is ethical analyses beyond “is it
> public or not” and for those analyses to be surfaced in the writing. So
> regardless of decisions, explaining them as part of methods would be great!
>
> Casey
>
> On Jul 13, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Tarleton L. Gillespie <tlg28 at cornell.edu
> <mailto:tlg28 at cornell.edu>> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, I scanned through Twitter's ToS and related policies; I
> didn't see anything indicating how they want a tweet to be cited. Maybe it
> did in earlier versions, or I just missed it. But even so, it's not clear
> how Twitter's ToS has any standing or relevance to what a researcher does,
> as they're not the person contracting with Twitter in that contract. We
> could take their advice in to account, but I think Nick and Casey's point
> is the right one. What's the added value to the research of including the
> person's Twitter handle in the publication, such that it overcomes the
> possible discomfort and possible harm it could bring? It's surprising to me
> how often adding the handle / the name of the speaker / the interviewee
> really doesn't add to the analysis -- that we may be doing it more because
> it's what journalists do, or because we want to perform that it’s a legit
> tweet, or out of habit. Our instinct should not be how much can I publish
> based on what rights I think people have given up, but how far can I go to
> protect people and still make the cogent analysis the discussion requires.
>
> Tarleton
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/13/18, 11:17 AM, "Air-L on behalf of Proferes, Nicholas" <
> air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org>
> on behalf of nproferes at uky.edu<mailto:nproferes at uky.edu>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Casey Fiesler and I recently published an article on Twitter users’
> perceptions of the use of tweets in research (http://journals.sagepub.com/
> doi/abs/10.1177/2056305118763366).
>
>
> One of our findings from the study was that when we asked, "How would
> you feel if a Tweet of yours was used in a research study and your Tweet
> was quoted in a published research paper, attributed to your Twitter
> handle?" only about ~24% of respondents indicated that they would be
> comfortable with this.
>
>
> There's obviously a lot of situations in which including Twitter handles
> is appropriate (quoting public figures seems like a pretty clear cut case),
> but I do think it might be worth taking user expectations into
> consideration in that contextual decision, particularly if you are working
> with populations subject to harassment/bullying.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick
>
> ________________________________
> From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l-bounces@
> listserv.aoir.org>> on behalf of Judith Rosenbaum-Andre <
> judith.rosenbaumandre at maine.edu<mailto:judith.rosenbaumandre at maine.edu>>
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 6:45:06 AM
> To: daniel.thomas--airl at cl.cam.ac.uk<mailto:daniel.thomas--airl@
> cl.cam.ac.uk>
> Cc: air-l at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Including screennames with tweets
>
> I just recently published a book on Twitter, race, and gender, and my
> publisher was very insistent I did use people's Twitter handles. For
> clarification, I used all publicly available tweets. I went back and
> forth
> on it myself a few times (and still every once in a while wake up in the
> middle of the night thinking, "did I do the right thing?!"), but ended up
> agreeing with them. Their argument, per Twitter's ToS, was that people's
> tweets should be treated as you would an in-text citation (e.g., "Hayes
> said"), as they are their thoughts and ideas, expressed in a public
> forum,
> and thus they have earned the right to be credited for them (almost on a
> par with copyright). Because I used public tweets anyone could and can
> still find the tweets even if I hadn't listed the screen name, which
> renders the argument that we need to protect their identity somewhat
> moot.
> In my book, I discuss some pretty awful statements though, and I did make
> sure to not choose tweets as examples that could really get people into
> trouble with their employer, for instance, and would instead use more
> innocuous tweets to illustrate my point. This kind of research, because I
> use public tweets, falls outside of our IRB's scope, as they consider it
> public information on a par with analyzing media content and thus
> non-human-subjects research.
> I don't know if this helps at all - I think it's a tough issue to deal
> with, and both decisions, like you said, have their pros and cons.
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:27 AM Daniel Thomas <
> daniel.thomas--airl at cl.cam.ac.uk<mailto:daniel.thomas--airl at cl.cam.ac.uk>>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Becky,
>
> My understanding, though I haven't been involved in Twitter research
> myself, is that academics in the US have mostly decided it is fine to
> include screennames and that academics in the UK have mostly decided
> it is not OK to include screennames. I think that Twitter ToS require
> the sceennames to be included and allow publication as long as the
> full tweet is published (including sceenname). However, publishing
> without the sceenname is not permitted (this is second hand
> information so I may be wrong). The other issue is that even if
> sceennames are not included then it is easy to find the author from
> the content of the tweet and so the authors are still trivially
> deanonymised. Minor tweaks to punctuation/wording are apparently also
> insufficient as Twitter's search function will still normally find the
> original tweet.
> Depending on the research method you are using it may be possible to
> write your own synthesised example tweets that are representative of
> the kind of things people say. However, I know that for some
> methods/fields that is not possible.
>
> I think it is a question where you will want your Research Ethics
> Board/IRB to sign off on your answer.
>
> Helena Webb <helena.webb at cs.ox.ac.uk<mailto:helena.webb at cs.ox.ac.uk>>
> from the University of Oxford
> might be a good person to talk to about this because she uses a
> similar Twitter example in her research ethics case studies at the
> workshops she runs. She did research that she was not able to publish
> because she ran into this problem and was not able to find a solution
> that protected the tweeters and was publishable.
>
> Daniel
>
> On 13/07/18 07:23, Hayes, Rebecca M wrote:
> Dear All,
> Can you please weigh in on the decision to include or not include
> screennames
> when we cite tweets in a book? The book is on new media and crime,
> and we are using tweets in a few places as examples of some
> different
> discussions.
>
> We are back and forth on whether we should include the screennames
> and
> at others or disclude them. The arguments we have seen thus far, are
> to include them because it was made public and we are citing someones
> words.
> The other argument is to disclude them
> as the person did not consent to have it printed in that way persay,
> and
> the screenname attached in our book could be used to find and harass
> the person. What are your thoughts?
>
> Thank you,
> Becky
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the
> Association of Internet Researchers
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faoir
> .org&data=02%7C01%7Cnproferes%40uky.edu<http://40uky.edu>%
> 7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008
> d5e8adbb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232
> 548876&sdata=HMh%2BFHkdWDwYlDJYLKOqngqLHFdyVdgHBF8JMuO1w5I%3D&am
> p;reserved=0 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists
> erv.aoir.org<http://erv.aoir.org>%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fair-l-aoir.org<
> http://2Fair-l-aoir.org>&data=02%7C01%7Cnprof
> eres%40uky.edu<http://40uky.edu>%7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008d5e8ad
> bb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b
> 818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232548876&sdata=h3LjEtUNDWWctq
> EjXv4m8jqET0juN0eyXDcHDAX7GJk%3D&reserved=0
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> aoir.org<http://aoir.org>%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cnproferes%40uky.edu<
> http://40uky.edu>%7C80b9cf66e88449f
> 8de5008d5e8adbb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C63667
> 0755232548876&sdata=bwNC%2FhiWey%2FF45XKHmM%2Bos06UdLh8vQFyXYtIp
> b2%2Bzw%3D&reserved=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the
> Association of Internet Researchers
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faoir.
> org&data=02%7C01%7Cnproferes%40uky.edu<http://40uky.edu>%
> 7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008d5
> e8adbb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232558
> 886&sdata=O5fdUR88%2BN84HGFN7YMzcIzYnWaEdtaFqmI1SA8fcvI%3D&re
> served=0 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists
> erv.aoir.org<http://erv.aoir.org>%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fair-l-aoir.org<
> http://2Fair-l-aoir.org>&data=02%7C01%7Cnprof
> eres%40uky.edu<http://40uky.edu>%7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008d5e8ad
> bb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b
> 818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232558886&sdata=lAvZL%2Fcshbz8
> PzqtmolrwXtQd0HPzcKAe6qrs4IQXkk%3D&reserved=0
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.a
> oir.org<http://oir.org>%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cnproferes%40uky.edu<
> http://40uky.edu>%7C80b9cf66e88449f8d
> e5008d5e8adbb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C63667075
> 5232558886&sdata=i49yZe8HhgP7InUdJwGQOObj0DYrsH5oPWYmkIlXKUs%3D&a
> mp;reserved=0
>
>
>
> --
> Judith E. Rosenbaum, PhD
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Communication and Journalism
> University of Maine
> 414 Dunn Hall
> Orono, ME 04469
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.juditherosenbaum.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cnproferes%40uky.edu%
> 7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008d5e8adbb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d
> 42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232558886&sdata=2kw65MmcKlu5C61oSqIdQxH7E1Jw0Z
> 0qWYERWLhM4IU%3D&reserved=0
> @JudithRBaum
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Faoir.org&data=02%7C01%7Cnproferes%40uky.edu%
> 7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008d5e8adbb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d
> 42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232558886&sdata=O5fdUR88%
> 2BN84HGFN7YMzcIzYnWaEdtaFqmI1SA8fcvI%3D&reserved=0
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistse
> rv.aoir.org<http://rv.aoir.org>%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fair-l-aoir.org<
> http://2Fair-l-aoir.org>&data=02%7C01%7Cnprofer
> es%40uky.edu<http://40uky.edu>%7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008d5e8ad
> bb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818
> 481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232558886&sdata=lAvZL%2Fcshbz8Pzqt
> molrwXtQd0HPzcKAe6qrs4IQXkk%3D&reserved=0
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aoir.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cnproferes%40uky.edu%
> 7C80b9cf66e88449f8de5008d5e8adbb9d%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d
> 42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636670755232558886&sdata=i49yZe8HhgP7InUdJwGQOObj0DYrsH
> 5oPWYmkIlXKUs%3D&reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the
> Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change
> options or unsubscribe at:
> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/
> listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
>
> The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No
> SC013683.
> Tha Oilthigh Obar Dheathain na charthannas clàraichte ann an Alba, Àir.
> SC013683.
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/
> listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/
> listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L at listserv.aoir.org> mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/
> listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/
> listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
More information about the Air-L
mailing list