[Air-L] non-Zoom platforms....again

Thu Jul 30 11:41:09 PDT 2020

Echoing the thank you for sharing this Zoom resource/critique Mehitabel.

Ushnish, I really appreciate this text from Shea Swagger, "Our Bodies Encoded," which explores and critiques proctoring software. Shea says what I want to say, only with fewer curse words than I sometimes use when talking to colleagues about surveillance software.
https://hybridpedagogy.org/our-bodies-encoded-algorithmic-test-proctoring-in-higher-education/

Best,
Kim

Kim Jaxon

Professor, English (Composition & Literacy)

Director, Northern California Writing Project<http://norcalwp.org/ncwp/>

CSU, Chico

kjaxon at csuchico.edu

http://www.kimjaxon.com/

@drjaxon <https://twitter.com/drjaxon>

Pronouns: she/her/hers

________________________________
From: Air-L <air-l-bounces at listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Ushnish Sengupta <ushnish.sengupta at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 11:21 AM
To: air-l at listserv.aoir.org <air-l at listserv.aoir.org>
Subject: Re: [Air-L] non-Zoom platforms....again

Thank you for the excellent summary document on Zoom Mehitabel

I am also concerned about the racial inequity issues of automated online
proctoring systems, that are used in conjunction with videoconferencing
systems such as Zoom.
>From what we know of bias in facial recognition and detection algorithms,
these systems that try to detect student faces changing direction
(potential cheating) during online exams have a significant number of
racial injustice issues.

Ushnish Sengupta

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:28:45 -0400
From: Mehitabel Glenhaber <glenhabe at usc.edu>
To: alexandre.hocquet at univ-lorraine.fr
Cc: air-l at listserv.aoir.org
Subject: Re: [Air-L] non-Zoom platforms....again
Message-ID:
        <CAMASph4WHCA1xi1xxpuDwR5A4nFKqoSioyvenLbcTdUJkVaXag at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Alexandre and everyone,

This is maybe a bit adjacent to your question, but I have also been
concerned watching Zoom rapidly gobble up a near-monopoly on remote
education in the United States. Here is an informal resource that I created
at the start of the pandemic, and recently updated, warning about the
dangers of Zoom becoming a monopoly, and advising educators about
alternatives, and how to minimize the harms of using Zoom in the classroom:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o7Eq17jdWCtu2CaC15JBbdVU1p7fx2_jReH6qoFafMM/edit?usp=sharing
I hope it's helpful to you in writing your article, and also generally to
folks on this list going into teaching remotely the next semester.

I think the situation in the US is very similar to the one you describe in
France (with the exception, perhaps, that there was less of an existing
open source infrastructure which Zoom replaced - though that's just my
impression)

Cheers,
Mehitabel

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:41 PM Alexandre Hocquet <
alexandre.hocquet at univ-lorraine.fr> wrote:

> Dear AoIRers,
>
> long time lurker, first time poster*. A recent inquiry to the list
> asking for non-Zoom platforms gave me the idea to ask advice here
> regarding a project for an opinion piece I have about the recent taking
> over of online conferencing by Zoom (and Microsoft Teams)  in Academia.
>
> My point is that the Covid crisis has led (in France at least, and I'm
> willing to have the opinion about academics in other countries) to the
> complete outsourcing to those two corporate platforms for online
> teaching (and scholarly conferencing), which means
>
> 1) the renouncement to a once functional dedicated national
> infrastructure (namely, in France, the use of free software Jitsi within
> the state-sponsored "Renater" academic infrastructure)
>
> 2) the surrendering of Academia to corporations well known to abuse the
> extraction and commodification of data (Zoom) and well known to
> "embrace, extend and extinguish" anything within their reach (Microsoft)
>
> My point is that it is completely contradictory to a supposed general
> institutional trend towards "open science", and that open software is
> often  forgotten besides open litterature and open data, and that the
> pandemic has accelerated the disintegration of an academic national and
> open infrastructure.
>
> So my questions are :
>
> 1) Is anybody aware of an already existing piece expressing that concerns
?
>
> 2) Is anybody willing to share what is the situation in their country
> regarding this issue ?
>
> Best,
>
>
> * for a little background and as a newcomer presentation, I am a
> historian of science and my area is the issue of openness within
> scientific modelling software .
>
>
>
>
--

*Key Articles:*

The Future of Social Economy Leadership and Organizational Composition in
Canada: Demand from Demographics, and Difference through Diversity
<http://interventionseconomiques.revues.org/2794>

Indigenous Cooperatives in Canada: The Complex Relationship Between
Cooperatives, Community Economic Development,Colonization, and Culture
<http://www.jeodonline.com/sites/jeodonline.com/files/articles/2015/08/13/6sengupta13aug2015.pdf>

Indigenous Communities and Social Enterprise in Canada:Incorporating
Culture as an Essential Ingredient of Entrepreneurship
<http://anserj.ca/anser/index.php/cjnser/article/view/196>
_______________________________________________
The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org

Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
http://www.aoir.org/