[Assam] Now This -- From ToI
Chan Mahanta
cmahanta at charter.net
Sun Feb 1 12:15:42 PST 2009
Wasn't this RTI - thingie meant to be the 'real big' reform measure ,
with everyone going ga-ga over the ostensible new beginning for a
transparent governance?
cm
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Assets_of_ministers_kin_out_of_RTI_ambit_PMO/articleshow/4060646.cms
Assets of ministers, kin exempt from RTI: PMO
NEW DELHI: At a time when pressure is mounting on the judiciary to
disclose its assets, the executive wing of the government has come
into the limelight for its attitude towards transparency.
In a decision that could have a far-reaching impact on administrative
accountability, the PMO, widely seen as leading the government
towards transparency has decided to withhold information related to
assets of ministers and their relatives.
Responding to a query by applicant Subhash Chandra Agrawal, the PMO
termed the information as exempt under clauses 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j)
which relate to immunity granted to "documents fiduciary
relationship" and "Cabinet documents" under the RTI Act.
Agrawal has now filed an appeal with the Central Information Commission.
Significantly, the PMO had initially agreed to part with the
information. But in a curious U-turn on December 17, 2008, the PMO
held that details sought by the applicant were exempt from
disclosure. The `no' was repeated on January 27, 2009, when Agrawal
persisted with his effort.
It was last year that Agrawal had filed the RTI application seeking
details of assets of Union ministers and their relatives for the last
two years from cabinet secretariat. The letter was forwarded to Prime
Minister's Office for necessary action.
In his appeal, Agrawal points to the PMO's reversal of stance. "The
PMO was ready to divulge the information but there has been a change
in decision," Agrawal said.
More information about the Assam
mailing list