[Assam] Any comment?

Chan Mahanta cmahanta at gmail.com
Wed May 5 07:58:27 PDT 2010


 >The core issue itself is a known
disqualifier .


*** According to whom, would be the question.







On May 5, 2010, at 9:53 AM, kamal deka wrote:

> We are back to the square one.The core issue itself is a known
> disqualifier .Any amounts of talks,therefore.will take them nowhere
> but reach a stalemate.Is there a point?
> KJD
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>>
>>> In my view,talks must be held without any pre-conditions
>>>
>>> in order to end the impasse that exists between ULFA and the
>>> government.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *** What are the talks about?
>>
>> One might think it is to bring the conflict to an end.
>>
>> Now, what is the conflict about?
>>
>> Unless we are developmentally challenged, we know that it is about  
>> the
>> demand of 'sovereignty'.
>>
>> Now then, if a party to the conflict , namely GoI and its puppets/ 
>> servants
>> at Dispur refuses to acknowledge and discuss the main issue of the  
>> conflict,
>> is this not a
>> profoundly absurd proposition? Is GoI's stance not entirely a  
>> gimmick to
>> fool the
>> people into thinking that they are the reasonable people, willing  
>> to sit
>> down
>> for a political solution, while refusing to acknowledge or deal  
>> with the
>> MAIN
>> issue?
>>
>> Who are fooling?
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 5, 2010, at 9:25 AM, kamal deka wrote:
>>
>>> Of what measure will a parley be ,when the core issue itself is a
>>> basket case? In my view,talks must be held without any pre- 
>>> conditions
>>> in order to end the impasse that exists between ULFA and the
>>> government.
>>> KJD
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't wish to comment on the preamble to the proposition, but  
>>>> it is a
>>>> wise
>>>> and thoughtful view.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 4, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Dilip and Dil Deka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Netters,
>>>>> Any comment on the letter to the editor (in the AT) by the  
>>>>> title, "Clear
>>>>> Stand"?
>>>>> I wrote the letter and it was published in its entirety. The  
>>>>> editors
>>>>> added
>>>>> the title.
>>>>> May 4 issue of the Assam Tribune piublished it though the letter  
>>>>> was
>>>>> written and sent before the so called "Intellectuals Convention".
>>>>> Dilip Deka
>>>>> Houston
>>>>>  <Page06.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> assam at assamnet.org
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org





More information about the Assam mailing list