[Assam] Any comment?

[kamal deka]

Common sense.

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at gmail.com> wrote:
>>The core issue itself is a known
> disqualifier .
>
>
> *** According to whom, would be the question.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 5, 2010, at 9:53 AM, kamal deka wrote:
>
>> We are back to the square one.The core issue itself is a known
>> disqualifier .Any amounts of talks,therefore.will take them nowhere
>> but reach a stalemate.Is there a point?
>> KJD
>>
>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In my view,talks must be held without any pre-conditions
>>>>
>>>> in order to end the impasse that exists between ULFA and the
>>>> government.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *** What are the talks about?
>>>
>>> One might think it is to bring the conflict to an end.
>>>
>>> Now, what is the conflict about?
>>>
>>> Unless we are developmentally challenged, we know that it is about the
>>> demand of 'sovereignty'.
>>>
>>> Now then, if a party to the conflict , namely GoI and its
>>> puppets/servants
>>> at Dispur refuses to acknowledge and discuss the main issue of the
>>> conflict,
>>> is this not a
>>> profoundly absurd proposition? Is GoI's stance not entirely a gimmick to
>>> fool the
>>> people into thinking that they are the reasonable people, willing to sit
>>> down
>>> for a political solution, while refusing to acknowledge or deal with the
>>> MAIN
>>> issue?
>>>
>>> Who are fooling?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 5, 2010, at 9:25 AM, kamal deka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Of what measure will a parley be ,when the core issue itself is a
>>>> basket case? In my view,talks must be held without any pre-conditions
>>>> in order to end the impasse that exists between ULFA and the
>>>> government.
>>>> KJD
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't wish to comment on the preamble to the proposition, but it is a
>>>>> wise
>>>>> and thoughtful view.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 4, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Dilip and Dil Deka wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Netters,
>>>>>> Any comment on the letter to the editor (in the AT) by the title,
>>>>>> "Clear
>>>>>> Stand"?
>>>>>> I wrote the letter and it was published in its entirety. The editors
>>>>>> added
>>>>>> the title.
>>>>>> May 4 issue of the Assam Tribune piublished it though the letter was
>>>>>> written and sent before the so called "Intellectuals Convention".
>>>>>> Dilip Deka
>>>>>> Houston
>>>>>>  <Page06.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> assam at assamnet.org
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> assam at assamnet.org
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>