[Assam] Armed Revolution is an Outdated Concept

[Chan Mahanta]

 >But let us not change the subject
>
>  -- OK let us not change the subject.  The Subject was article by  
> Kamath, Susanta's comments  and your appreciation to that post.

*** That is the subject?



> --  I have said earlier "yes you did not say   these exact words". 


*** You had every opportunity to admit that you fabricated a statement  
and attributed it to me, falsely.
And you still can't.


That is what it is all about.











On May 24, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:

>> Actually I am shaking in my flip-flops as I write.
>
> --- Uh! I am scared !
>
>> But let us not change the subject
>
> -- OK let us not change the subject.  The Subject was article by  
> Kamath, Susanta's comments  and your appreciation to that post.  So  
> have you mustered the courage to answer to the unpleasant questions  
> which I posted ?
>
>> Where and when did I say or write
> or implt, what you attributed to me.
>
> --  I have said earlier "yes you did not say   these exact words".   
> Your harping on this same topic shows that you are trying to divert  
> the main questions that were raised ... as always
>
>> Fabricating something that is patently a fraud does not constitute
> mocking. It is called slander.
>
> ---  OK .. go ahead ...  file a lawsuit against me.
>
>> People with honor and integrity own up to transgressions when it is
> pointed out .
>
> ---  As I pointed earlier,  why don't you show with examples how to  
> own up to transgressions when it is  pointed out.   I have pointed  
> to one of your lies ... let me know if you want more.
>
> ********************************************
>> You are apprehensive that I will again take you to a point where you
> have no answers to some unpleasant questions ... like what you are
> avoiding now.
> *** Actually I am shaking in my flip-flops as I write.
> But let us not change the subject. Where and when did I say or write
> or implt, what you attributed to me.
> Fabricating something that is patently a fraud does not constitute
> mocking. It is called slander.
> People with honor and integrity own up to transgressions when it is
> pointed out .
>
>
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>> I can see your reason for coming down so heavily .   You are
>> apprehensive that I will again take you to a point where you have no
>> answers to some unpleasant questions ... like what you are avoiding
>> now .  You just picked that one point to brush aside all other
>> questions which I have raised.
>>
>> Let me make it clear --   it is NOT a fault of Assamnet -- it is a
>> lack of feature due to which one need more time to find a post.  And
>> I have mentioned what is there in that post.
>>
>> In my post,  I said "yes you did not say   these exact words" ,   if
>> that is not "integrity to admit it"  I  sure need to learn what
>> "integrity to admit" means.
>>
>>   I have explained -- I was mocking your never ending "put the blame
>> on GOI"  and "ULFA is all saint"
>> But, let me point to one of your the numerous  white lies YOU have
>> come up with time to time -- http://assamnet.org/pipermail/assam_assamnet.org/2007-October/015731.html
>>       where you claimed that RSS is in US Terror list  (and ULFA and
>> RSS are just the same category !).   I do not remember you  admiting
>> that you lied.
>> Probably you can teach me with examples what  "integrity to admit"
>> means ... I am learning everyday :)
>>
>> Just one of numerous cases ...  What a shame! Very unbecoming.
>>
>>
>> BTW,  don't ever think that your scare tactics  will stop me asking
>> unpleasant questions ... pointing to flaws in your arguments .
>>
>>
>>
>> *********************************************************
>>> Unfortunately,  Assamnet does not have a search feature but I
>> promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.
>> *** Is it therefore the fault of assamnet?
>> It now established that the attribute was a pure fabrication, a bald
>> faced lie.  But you cannot muster that bit of integrity
>> to admit it, instead blaming it on assamnet for not having the search
>> engine, for if it did, you surely would have dug-up the
>> evidence.
>> What a shame! Very unbecoming.
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 24, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>> I am honored to see that I am placed in same row as many others
>>> including Kamath and those who are supporting his article . All are
>>> perfect idiots.   I am sure there are plenty of Idiots around whom
>>> you would not like.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why are you shying from the point .... have you, the champion of
>>> human rights,  ever criticized ULFA (or maoists) for killing
>>> innocents ?  And if not  what is the reason ?
>>>
>>> Coming to exact point (on what you said) ,  yes you did not say
>>> these exact words ....  I was mocking what you actually said --- you
>>> actually put the blame of killing these children on GOI -- you said
>>> GOI is responsible for sending these children.  And as we have seen
>>> in this net for years  ,  you will use all your twisting to  put the
>>> blame on GOI even if it means going to an absurd level.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately,  Assamnet does not have a search feature but I
>>> promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.
>>>
>>> But that does not dilute my questions to Susanta (and you,  you were
>>> gaga on Susanta's comment) --  if one is to show Gandhism to those
>>> who killed children or villagers why one should not show Gandhism to
>>> a rapist or a murderer ?
>>>
>>>
>>> ************************************************************************************
>>>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but
>>>> camoflauged  Indian killers )
>>>
>>>
>>> *** That is presented as a quote from myself.
>>>
>>> Is it something I said or even implied? Show netters when or where
>>> you
>>> saw that coming from me.
>>>
>>> Fact is, it is a malicious fabrication of the basest kind. A bald
>>> faced lie.
>>>
>>> People who are able to articulate a credible opposing view do not
>>> need
>>> to resort to such tactics of fabricating
>>> false statements to counter something one does not agree with. It
>>> is a
>>> thoroughly dishonorable pursuit.
>>>
>>> But I can appreciate the fact that such things as honor, personal
>>> integrity etc. are not necessary
>>> accouterments even of  degrees with pedigree.
>>>
>>>
>>>> but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for ULFA.
>>>
>>> *** Is that therefore your PROOF  that I said what you claim I did?
>>> Only a perfect IDIOT  would make such a claim.
>>> I have seen only one other assamnetter make such arguments in my
>>> entire tenure here spanning
>>> nearly 15 years.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 24, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will be happy to be proved as a liar ... but that means ULFA
>>>> killed innocent civillians/children.  Did I ever see ANY words of
>>>> criticizm from you ?  You are all over on human rights violation  
>>>> and
>>>> what not  but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for
>>>> ULFA.
>>>> Double standards ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *****************************************************
>>>>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but camoflauged  Indian
>>>> killers )
>>>>
>>>> No need to be bald faced liar in attributing such a statement to  
>>>> me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org