[Assam] Armed Revolution is an Outdated Concept

[Krishnendu Chakraborty]

>But let us not change the subject
>
>  -- OK let us not change the subject.  The Subject was article by  
> Kamath, Susanta's comments  and your appreciation to that post.

*** That is the subject?
 
--  You probably did not even glance at the subject line of email before you sent it out :-)



> --  I have said earlier "yes you did not say   these exact words". 


*** You had every opportunity to admit that you fabricated a statement  
and attributed it to me, falsely.
And you still can't.

That is what it is all about.
 
--- That is NOT what it is all about.  
I admitted "you did not say   these exact words"  in my first post .   But you have been harping on it to avoid all other unpleasant questions -- that is what it is about
 
I pointed your white lies which you have never admitted in many moons ... that is what it is all about.  

I pointed   and keep pointing to flaws in your arguments and you just want to shoo me away that is what it is all about (but it is not going to happen)









On May 24, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:

>> Actually I am shaking in my flip-flops as I write.
>
> --- Uh! I am scared !
>
>> But let us not change the subject
>
> -- OK let us not change the subject.  The Subject was article by  
> Kamath, Susanta's comments  and your appreciation to that post.  So  
> have you mustered the courage to answer to the unpleasant questions  
> which I posted ?
>
>> Where and when did I say or write
> or implt, what you attributed to me.
>
> --  I have said earlier "yes you did not say   these exact words".   
> Your harping on this same topic shows that you are trying to divert  
> the main questions that were raised ... as always
>
>> Fabricating something that is patently a fraud does not constitute
> mocking. It is called slander.
>
> ---  OK .. go ahead ...  file a lawsuit against me.
>
>> People with honor and integrity own up to transgressions when it is
> pointed out .
>
> ---  As I pointed earlier,  why don't you show with examples how to  
> own up to transgressions when it is  pointed out.   I have pointed  
> to one of your lies ... let me know if you want more.
>
> ********************************************
>> You are apprehensive that I will again take you to a point where you
> have no answers to some unpleasant questions ... like what you are
> avoiding now.
> *** Actually I am shaking in my flip-flops as I write.
> But let us not change the subject. Where and when did I say or write
> or implt, what you attributed to me.
> Fabricating something that is patently a fraud does not constitute
> mocking. It is called slander.
> People with honor and integrity own up to transgressions when it is
> pointed out .
>
>
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>> I can see your reason for coming down so heavily .   You are
>> apprehensive that I will again take you to a point where you have no
>> answers to some unpleasant questions ... like what you are avoiding
>> now .  You just picked that one point to brush aside all other
>> questions which I have raised.
>>
>> Let me make it clear --   it is NOT a fault of Assamnet -- it is a
>> lack of feature due to which one need more time to find a post.  And
>> I have mentioned what is there in that post.
>>
>> In my post,  I said "yes you did not say   these exact words" ,   if
>> that is not "integrity to admit it"  I  sure need to learn what
>> "integrity to admit" means.
>>
>>   I have explained -- I was mocking your never ending "put the blame
>> on GOI"  and "ULFA is all saint"
>> But, let me point to one of your the numerous  white lies YOU have
>> come up with time to time -- http://assamnet.org/pipermail/assam_assamnet.org/2007-October/015731.html
>>       where you claimed that RSS is in US Terror list  (and ULFA and
>> RSS are just the same category !).   I do not remember you  admiting
>> that you lied.
>> Probably you can teach me with examples what  "integrity to admit"
>> means ... I am learning everyday :)
>>
>> Just one of numerous cases ...  What a shame! Very unbecoming.
>>
>>
>> BTW,  don't ever think that your scare tactics  will stop me asking
>> unpleasant questions ... pointing to flaws in your arguments .
>>
>>
>>
>> *********************************************************
>>> Unfortunately,  Assamnet does not have a search feature but I
>> promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.
>> *** Is it therefore the fault of assamnet?
>> It now established that the attribute was a pure fabrication, a bald
>> faced lie.  But you cannot muster that bit of integrity
>> to admit it, instead blaming it on assamnet for not having the search
>> engine, for if it did, you surely would have dug-up the
>> evidence.
>> What a shame! Very unbecoming.
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 24, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>> I am honored to see that I am placed in same row as many others
>>> including Kamath and those who are supporting his article . All are
>>> perfect idiots.   I am sure there are plenty of Idiots around whom
>>> you would not like.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why are you shying from the point .... have you, the champion of
>>> human rights,  ever criticized ULFA (or maoists) for killing
>>> innocents ?  And if not  what is the reason ?
>>>
>>> Coming to exact point (on what you said) ,  yes you did not say
>>> these exact words ....  I was mocking what you actually said --- you
>>> actually put the blame of killing these children on GOI -- you said
>>> GOI is responsible for sending these children.  And as we have seen
>>> in this net for years  ,  you will use all your twisting to  put the
>>> blame on GOI even if it means going to an absurd level.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately,  Assamnet does not have a search feature but I
>>> promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.
>>>
>>> But that does not dilute my questions to Susanta (and you,  you were
>>> gaga on Susanta's comment) --  if one is to show Gandhism to those
>>> who killed children or villagers why one should not show Gandhism to
>>> a rapist or a murderer ?
>>>
>>>
>>> ************************************************************************************
>>>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but
>>>> camoflauged  Indian killers )
>>>
>>>
>>> *** That is presented as a quote from myself.
>>>
>>> Is it something I said or even implied? Show netters when or where
>>> you
>>> saw that coming from me.
>>>
>>> Fact is, it is a malicious fabrication of the basest kind. A bald
>>> faced lie.
>>>
>>> People who are able to articulate a credible opposing view do not
>>> need
>>> to resort to such tactics of fabricating
>>> false statements to counter something one does not agree with. It
>>> is a
>>> thoroughly dishonorable pursuit.
>>>
>>> But I can appreciate the fact that such things as honor, personal
>>> integrity etc. are not necessary
>>> accouterments even of  degrees with pedigree.
>>>
>>>
>>>> but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for ULFA.
>>>
>>> *** Is that therefore your PROOF  that I said what you claim I did?
>>> Only a perfect IDIOT  would make such a claim.
>>> I have seen only one other assamnetter make such arguments in my
>>> entire tenure here spanning
>>> nearly 15 years.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 24, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will be happy to be proved as a liar ... but that means ULFA
>>>> killed innocent civillians/children.  Did I ever see ANY words of
>>>> criticizm from you ?  You are all over on human rights violation  
>>>> and
>>>> what not  but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for
>>>> ULFA.
>>>> Double standards ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *****************************************************
>>>>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but camoflauged  Indian
>>>> killers )
>>>>
>>>> No need to be bald faced liar in attributing such a statement to  
>>>> me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>