[Assam] Armed Revolution is an Outdated Concept
Chan Mahanta
cmahanta at gmail.com
Mon May 24 10:23:46 PDT 2010
>you did not say these exact words"
*** Then why did you attribute them to me? Those were YOUR words,
weren't they, fabrication ?
Is it a honorable thing to do so?
On May 24, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>> But let us not change the subject
>>
>> -- OK let us not change the subject. The Subject was article by
>> Kamath, Susanta's comments and your appreciation to that post.
>
> *** That is the subject?
>
> -- You probably did not even glance at the subject line of email
> before you sent it out :-)
>
>
>
>> -- I have said earlier "yes you did not say these exact words".
>
>
> *** You had every opportunity to admit that you fabricated a statement
> and attributed it to me, falsely.
> And you still can't.
>
> That is what it is all about.
>
> --- That is NOT what it is all about.
> I admitted "you did not say these exact words" in my first
> post . But you have been harping on it to avoid all other
> unpleasant questions -- that is what it is about
>
> I pointed your white lies which you have never admitted in many
> moons ... that is what it is all about.
>
> I pointed and keep pointing to flaws in your arguments and you
> just want to shoo me away that is what it is all about (but it is
> not going to happen)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>
>>> Actually I am shaking in my flip-flops as I write.
>>
>> --- Uh! I am scared !
>>
>>> But let us not change the subject
>>
>> -- OK let us not change the subject. The Subject was article by
>> Kamath, Susanta's comments and your appreciation to that post. So
>> have you mustered the courage to answer to the unpleasant questions
>> which I posted ?
>>
>>> Where and when did I say or write
>> or implt, what you attributed to me.
>>
>> -- I have said earlier "yes you did not say these exact words".
>> Your harping on this same topic shows that you are trying to divert
>> the main questions that were raised ... as always
>>
>>> Fabricating something that is patently a fraud does not constitute
>> mocking. It is called slander.
>>
>> --- OK .. go ahead ... file a lawsuit against me.
>>
>>> People with honor and integrity own up to transgressions when it is
>> pointed out .
>>
>> --- As I pointed earlier, why don't you show with examples how to
>> own up to transgressions when it is pointed out. I have pointed
>> to one of your lies ... let me know if you want more.
>>
>> ********************************************
>>> You are apprehensive that I will again take you to a point where you
>> have no answers to some unpleasant questions ... like what you are
>> avoiding now.
>> *** Actually I am shaking in my flip-flops as I write.
>> But let us not change the subject. Where and when did I say or write
>> or implt, what you attributed to me.
>> Fabricating something that is patently a fraud does not constitute
>> mocking. It is called slander.
>> People with honor and integrity own up to transgressions when it is
>> pointed out .
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 24, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>> I can see your reason for coming down so heavily . You are
>>> apprehensive that I will again take you to a point where you have no
>>> answers to some unpleasant questions ... like what you are avoiding
>>> now . You just picked that one point to brush aside all other
>>> questions which I have raised.
>>>
>>> Let me make it clear -- it is NOT a fault of Assamnet -- it is a
>>> lack of feature due to which one need more time to find a post. And
>>> I have mentioned what is there in that post.
>>>
>>> In my post, I said "yes you did not say these exact words" , if
>>> that is not "integrity to admit it" I sure need to learn what
>>> "integrity to admit" means.
>>>
>>> I have explained -- I was mocking your never ending "put the
>>> blame
>>> on GOI" and "ULFA is all saint"
>>> But, let me point to one of your the numerous white lies YOU have
>>> come up with time to time -- http://assamnet.org/pipermail/assam_assamnet.org/2007-October/015731.html
>>> where you claimed that RSS is in US Terror list (and ULFA
>>> and
>>> RSS are just the same category !). I do not remember you admiting
>>> that you lied.
>>> Probably you can teach me with examples what "integrity to admit"
>>> means ... I am learning everyday :)
>>>
>>> Just one of numerous cases ... What a shame! Very unbecoming.
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW, don't ever think that your scare tactics will stop me asking
>>> unpleasant questions ... pointing to flaws in your arguments .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *********************************************************
>>>> Unfortunately, Assamnet does not have a search feature but I
>>> promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.
>>> *** Is it therefore the fault of assamnet?
>>> It now established that the attribute was a pure fabrication, a bald
>>> faced lie. But you cannot muster that bit of integrity
>>> to admit it, instead blaming it on assamnet for not having the
>>> search
>>> engine, for if it did, you surely would have dug-up the
>>> evidence.
>>> What a shame! Very unbecoming.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 24, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>>> I am honored to see that I am placed in same row as many others
>>>> including Kamath and those who are supporting his article . All are
>>>> perfect idiots. I am sure there are plenty of Idiots around whom
>>>> you would not like.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why are you shying from the point .... have you, the champion of
>>>> human rights, ever criticized ULFA (or maoists) for killing
>>>> innocents ? And if not what is the reason ?
>>>>
>>>> Coming to exact point (on what you said) , yes you did not say
>>>> these exact words .... I was mocking what you actually said ---
>>>> you
>>>> actually put the blame of killing these children on GOI -- you said
>>>> GOI is responsible for sending these children. And as we have seen
>>>> in this net for years , you will use all your twisting to put
>>>> the
>>>> blame on GOI even if it means going to an absurd level.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, Assamnet does not have a search feature but I
>>>> promise I will find and post the exact words as I manage some time.
>>>>
>>>> But that does not dilute my questions to Susanta (and you, you
>>>> were
>>>> gaga on Susanta's comment) -- if one is to show Gandhism to those
>>>> who killed children or villagers why one should not show Gandhism
>>>> to
>>>> a rapist or a murderer ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ************************************************************************************
>>>>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but
>>>>> camoflauged Indian killers )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *** That is presented as a quote from myself.
>>>>
>>>> Is it something I said or even implied? Show netters when or where
>>>> you
>>>> saw that coming from me.
>>>>
>>>> Fact is, it is a malicious fabrication of the basest kind. A bald
>>>> faced lie.
>>>>
>>>> People who are able to articulate a credible opposing view do not
>>>> need
>>>> to resort to such tactics of fabricating
>>>> false statements to counter something one does not agree with. It
>>>> is a
>>>> thoroughly dishonorable pursuit.
>>>>
>>>> But I can appreciate the fact that such things as honor, personal
>>>> integrity etc. are not necessary
>>>> accouterments even of degrees with pedigree.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for ULFA.
>>>>
>>>> *** Is that therefore your PROOF that I said what you claim I did?
>>>> Only a perfect IDIOT would make such a claim.
>>>> I have seen only one other assamnetter make such arguments in my
>>>> entire tenure here spanning
>>>> nearly 15 years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 24, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will be happy to be proved as a liar ... but that means ULFA
>>>>> killed innocent civillians/children. Did I ever see ANY words of
>>>>> criticizm from you ? You are all over on human rights violation
>>>>> and
>>>>> what not but I do not remember seeing any words of criticizm for
>>>>> ULFA.
>>>>> Double standards ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *****************************************************
>>>>>> (oh well C'da says they were not children but camoflauged Indian
>>>>> killers )
>>>>>
>>>>> No need to be bald faced liar in attributing such a statement to
>>>>> me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam at assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
More information about the Assam
mailing list