[Air-L] Elsevier is taking down papers from Academia.edu

[Robert W. Gehl]

Exactly. Which is why I hope some universities and associations simply
take back publishing from the Elseviers and Taylor and Francises of the
world, do it online, and make it open access. We can keep doing the free
labor of writing, reviewing and even editing.

- Rob

Robert W. Gehl
Assistant Professor, Department of Communication
Affiliated Faculty, University Writing Program
The University of Utah
www.robertwgehl.org | @robertwgehl
Sent from our OS on our Internet

Watch for my book, Reverse Engineering Social Media, from Temple in 2014

On 12/07/2013 12:46 PM, Gil De Zuniga, Homero wrote:
> I know this might sound a bit odd, and I admit it beforehand : -}
> But it sends to me that "us" researchers are the ones who are really losing in this trend, beyond the discussion of open research.
> 1. We do the research
> 2. We review the research
> 3. The research gets published by Elsevier and other publishers, or Academia.edu
> 4. We make no money.
> 5. They do.
> I agree the system should be open. But if it's not, why shouldn't be the case that at least a decent part of the financial benefits revert back to the authors, departments, research units, schools, etc...
> Saludos,
> HGZ
>
> Homero Gil de Zúñiga
> Associate Professor
> Director, Digital Media Research Program (DMRP)
> communication.utexas.edu/strauss/dmrp
> Annette Strauss Institute for Civic Life
> College of Communication
> University of Texas - Austin
> utexas.edu
> Voice (512) 471 6323
> Fax (512) 471 7979
> www.homerogdz.com
> Google Scholar Profile
> @_HGZ_
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Robert W. Gehl"
> Date:12/07/2013 11:08 (GMT-06:00)
> To: air-l at listserv.aoir.org
> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Elsevier is taking down papers from Academia.edu
>
> Setting aside individual publishers' rules about posting pre-prints to a
> /personal/ site, I've wondered for some time why publishers have not yet
> gone after Academia.edu, which is not a personal site, but a centralized
> social network built in part on top of a lot of copyright violations.
> It's YouTube all over again.
>
> - Rob
>
> Robert W. Gehl
> Assistant Professor, Department of Communication
> Affiliated Faculty, University Writing Program
> The University of Utah
> www.robertwgehl.org<http://www.robertwgehl.org> | @robertwgehl
> Sent from our OS on our Internet
>
> Watch for my book, Reverse Engineering Social Media, from Temple in 2014
>
> On 12/07/2013 08:28 AM, Jen Jack Gieseking wrote:
>> To determine exactly what versions of papers you are allowed to post
>> publicly per contracts, you can use the Sherpa Romeo database to search
>> copyright policies of most journals in a clear, easy to understand format:
>> http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/.
>> JJG
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jen Jack Gieseking, Ph.D.
>> Postdoctoral Fellow in New Media and Data Visualization
>> Digital and Computational Studies Initiative, Bowdoin College
>> jgieseking at gmail.com
>> www.jgieseking.org<http://www.jgieseking.org>
>> www.spatiallyinclined.org<http://www.spatiallyinclined.org>
>> @jgieseking <https://twitter.com/jgieseking>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Michael Zimmer <zimmerm at uwm.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Precisely.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Zimmer, PhD
>>> Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies
>>> Director, Center for Information Policy Research
>>> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>>> e: zimmerm at uwm.edu
>>> w: www.michaelzimmer.org<http://www.michaelzimmer.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2013, at 6:21 AM, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2011 at reagle.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/06/2013 10:41 PM, Michael Zimmer wrote:
>>>>> Whoever wrote this isn't very familiar with publisher copyright
>>>>> transfer agreements.
>>>> Some publishers often distinguish between the author's draft and the
>>>> final peer reviewed and paginated version. That is, posting a draft on
>>>> your site (or to SSRN, say) is permissible, copying the final version is
>>>> not. Hence I'm curious as to which these removed versions were?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
>>> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>>
>>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>>> http://www.aoir.org/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
>> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
>> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>>
>> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
>> http://www.aoir.org/
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list
> is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org
> Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/