[Air-L] Re law at AoIR

Peter Timusk peterotimusk at gmail.com
Wed Jan 14 02:11:32 PST 2015


Sorry I will restate this simply as first thought of reading the call for papers for IR

How does the Supreme court imagine the Internet?


Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandra Braman [mailto:bramansandra at gmail.com] 
Sent: December-29-14 2:40 AM
To: peterotimusk at gmail.com
Subject: Re law at AoIR

Peter, on the question of whether or not there should be more attention to law and policy at AoIR, I'm with you, but your post below includes a wild array of quite different sources of and types of law and policy.  Anything you do that would be comparative would have to be consistent regarding just what it is that is being looked at.  You start by talking about court decisions at the constitutional level but wind up referring to government reports, etc.  Governments are complex organizations, to put it mildly, and governance -- with its significant intertwinings with the private sector and informal as well as formal approaches to decision-making and the exercise of power -- even more so.

If you were to focus on one specific comparative research project and issue a call for it, it could be useful for stimulating more work of this kind, certainly.

Sandra Braman

On 12/28/14, air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org <air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org> wrote:
> Send Air-L mailing list submissions to
> 	air-l at listserv.aoir.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	air-l-request at listserv.aoir.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	air-l-owner at listserv.aoir.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
> than "Re: Contents of Air-L digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Various Supreme Court's views of the Internet (Peter Timusk)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 00:12:45 -0500
> From: "Peter Timusk" <peterotimusk at gmail.com>
> To: "aoir list" <air-l at aoir.org>
> Subject: [Air-L] Various Supreme Court's views of the Internet
> Message-ID: <06b901d0225c$eb0a70d0$c11f5270$@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"
>
> I am looking at the call for proposals for IR16 and thinking about 
> something in legal studies scholarship where we also look at the 
> sociology of legal personnel not just laws. I  wonder if I were to 
> write a paper tracing the Canadian government's and in particular the 
> Supreme Court of Canada's imagining of the Internet from 1971 to 2014 
> would someone else be able to cover a similar paper from their 
> country? So we could do a panel of "legal imaginings of the Internet". 
> We could simply present all laws on the book about the net and legal 
> decisions.
>
>
>
> Also if someone can offer mentorship I would appreciate that. I have 
> been a reviewer for about 4 or so IR's now but haven't got a paper in myself yet.
>
>
>
> At IR 14 some of us in one session just chatting after the papers, 
> thought we should try to have more legal scholarship at IR's.
>
>
>
> In 2014 the Supreme Court ruled on privacy of browsing. And in the 
> early 1980's they ruled and puzzled on a hacking case before the 1986 
> criminal code rewrite that brought a crime of hacking into the law 
> books. Whereas the Canadian government released a report in about 1971 
> that envisioned all that was coming in communication and networked 
> computers. In the hacking case they seemed to not understand what a 
> time share system was or the crime, even though they obviously had 
> access and knowledge of the government report from 1971. Even now in 
> 2014 they are only just ruling on browsing and the government is only 
> recently studying social network sites with surveys.
>
>
>
> It's not the same as quantitative or survey based data research but I 
> would present various phrasings/texts of decisions where we can draw 
> out what the judges seem to think the net is.
>
>
>
> Can anyone join me in this?
>
>
>
> Peter Timusk  B.Math, B.A. legal studies
>
>
>
> Most of my Internet studies papers are here www.webpagex.org and my 
> old academic blog is here http://notebook.webpagex.org here is my 
> academia .edu page. https://uottawa.academia.edu/PeterTimusk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Air-L at listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the 
> Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change 
> options or unsubscribe at:
> http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
>
> Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
> http://www.aoir.org/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Air-L Digest, Vol 125, Issue 24
> **************************************
>




More information about the Air-L mailing list